IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i15p2993-d254448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Markov Decision Processes in the Evaluation of Corrective Maintenance Scheduling Policies for Offshore Wind Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Helene Seyr

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Michael Muskulus

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Optimization of the maintenance policies for offshore wind parks is an important step in lowering the costs of energy production from wind. The yield from wind energy production is expected to fall, which will increase the need to be cost efficient. In this article, the Markov decision process is presented and how it can be applied to evaluate different policies for corrective maintenance planning. In the case study, we show an alternative to the current state-of-the-art policy for corrective maintenance that will achieve a cost-reduction when energy production prices drop below the current levels. The presented method can be extended and applied to evaluate additional policies, with some examples provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Helene Seyr & Michael Muskulus, 2019. "Use of Markov Decision Processes in the Evaluation of Corrective Maintenance Scheduling Policies for Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:15:p:2993-:d:254448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/2993/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/2993/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Rebecca & Lazakis, Iraklis & Barbouchi, Sami & Johanning, Lars, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis of offshore wind farm operation and maintenance cost and availability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1226-1236.
    2. Esther Dornhelm & Helene Seyr & Michael Muskulus, 2019. "Vindby—A Serious Offshore Wind Farm Design Game," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mateusz Oszczypała & Jarosław Ziółkowski & Jerzy Małachowski, 2022. "Analysis of Light Utility Vehicle Readiness in Military Transportation Systems Using Markov and Semi-Markov Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Ágota Bányai, 2021. "Energy Consumption-Based Maintenance Policy Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-33, September.
    3. Nguyen, Thi-Anh-Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2022. "Developing an exhaustive optimal maintenance schedule for offshore wind turbines based on risk-assessment, technical factors and cost-effective evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brooks, Sam & Mahmood, Minhal & Roy, Rajkumar & Manolesos, Marinos & Salonitis, Konstantinos, 2023. "Self-reconfiguration simulations of turbines to reduce uneven farm degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1301-1314.
    2. Ioannou, Anastasia & Angus, Andrew & Brennan, Feargal, 2018. "A lifecycle techno-economic model of offshore wind energy for different entry and exit instances," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 406-424.
    3. Li, Mingxin & Jiang, Xiaoli & Carroll, James & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2022. "A multi-objective maintenance strategy optimization framework for offshore wind farms considering uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    4. Artigao, Estefania & Martín-Martínez, Sergio & Honrubia-Escribano, Andrés & Gómez-Lázaro, Emilio, 2018. "Wind turbine reliability: A comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1569-1583.
    5. Hailun Xie & Lars Johanning, 2023. "A Hierarchical Met-Ocean Data Selection Model for Fast O&M Simulation in Offshore Renewable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Jan Frederick Unnewehr & Hans-Peter Waldl & Thomas Pahlke & Iván Herráez & Anke Weidlich, 2020. "Reducing Operational Costs of Offshore HVDC Energy Export Systems Through Optimized Maintenance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Zhang, Chen & Gao, Wei & Yang, Tao & Guo, Sheng, 2019. "Opportunistic maintenance strategy for wind turbines considering weather conditions and spare parts inventory management," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 703-711.
    8. Bains, Henna & Madariaga, Ander & Troffaes, Matthias C.M. & Kazemtabrizi, Behzad, 2020. "An economic model for offshore transmission asset planning under severe uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1174-1184.
    9. Li, He & Teixeira, Angelo P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "A two-stage Failure Mode and Effect Analysis of offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1438-1461.
    10. Nguyen, Thi Anh Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan, 2019. "Improved maintenance optimization of offshore wind systems considering effects of government subsidies, lost production and discounted cost model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Nguyen, Thi-Anh-Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2022. "Developing an exhaustive optimal maintenance schedule for offshore wind turbines based on risk-assessment, technical factors and cost-effective evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    12. Álvarez-Rodríguez, Clara & Parrado-Hernández, Emilio & Pérez-Aracil, Jorge & Prieto-Godino, Luis & Salcedo-Sanz, Sancho, 2024. "Interpretable extreme wind speed prediction with concept bottleneck models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    13. Shafiee, Mahmood & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "Maintenance optimization and inspection planning of wind energy assets: Models, methods and strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Iain Dinwoodie & David McMillan & Iraklis Lazakis & Yalcin Dalgic & Matthew Revie, 2018. "On modeling insights for emerging engineering problems: A case study on the impact of climate uncertainty on the operational performance of offshore wind farms," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(5), pages 524-532, October.
    15. uit het Broek, Michiel A.J. & Veldman, Jasper & Fazi, Stefano & Greijdanus, Roy, 2019. "Evaluating resource sharing for offshore wind farm maintenance: The case of jack-up vessels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 619-632.
    16. Abel Arredondo-Galeana & Feargal Brennan, 2021. "Floating Offshore Vertical Axis Wind Turbines: Opportunities, Challenges and Way Forward," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Soszyńska-Budny Joanna & Chmielewski Mariusz & Pioch Joanna, 2023. "Reliability of Renewable Power Generation using the Example of Offshore Wind Farms," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 228-245, June.
    18. Roggenburg, Michael & Esquivel-Puentes, Helber A. & Vacca, Andrea & Bocanegra Evans, Humberto & Garcia-Bravo, Jose M. & Warsinger, David M. & Ivantysynova, Monika & Castillo, Luciano, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis of a hydraulic transmission for floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1194-1204.
    19. Adriana Florescu & Sorin Barabas & Tiberiu Dobrescu, 2019. "Research on Increasing the Performance of Wind Power Plants for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Simon Ambühl & John Dalsgaard Sørensen, 2017. "Sensitivity of Risk-Based Maintenance Planning of Offshore Wind Turbine Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:15:p:2993-:d:254448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.