IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i13p2473-d243298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of Temperature Effect on Start-Up Operation from Anaerobic Digestion of Acidified Palm Oil Mill Effluent

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Arif Fikri Hamzah

    (Research Centre for Sustainable Process Technology (CESPRO), Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 436000 UKM, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Jamaliah Md Jahim

    (Research Centre for Sustainable Process Technology (CESPRO), Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 436000 UKM, Selangor, Malaysia
    Chemical Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 436000 UKM, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Peer Mohamed Abdul

    (Research Centre for Sustainable Process Technology (CESPRO), Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 436000 UKM, Selangor, Malaysia
    Chemical Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 436000 UKM, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Ahmad Jaril Asis

    (Sime Darby Research Sdn Bhd, Lot 42700, Pulau Carey, Banting 42960, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

Malaysia is one of the largest palm oil producers worldwide and its most abundant waste, palm oil mill effluent (POME), can be used as a feedstock to produce methane. Anaerobic digestion is ideal for treating POME in methane production due to its tolerance to high-strength chemical oxygen demand (COD). In this work, we compared the culture conditions during the start-up of anaerobic digestion of acidified POME between thermophilic (55 °C) and mesophilic (37 °C) temperatures. The pH of the digester was maintained throughout the experiment at 7.30 ± 0.2 in a working volume of 1000 mL. This study revealed that the thermophilic temperature stabilized faster on the 44th day compared to the 52nd day for the mesophilic temperature. Furthermore, the thermophilic temperature indicated higher biogas production at 0.60 L- CH 4 /L·d compared to the mesophilic temperature at 0.26 L- CH 4 /L·d. Results from this study were consistent with the COD removal of thermophilic temperature which was also higher than the mesophilic temperature.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Arif Fikri Hamzah & Jamaliah Md Jahim & Peer Mohamed Abdul & Ahmad Jaril Asis, 2019. "Investigation of Temperature Effect on Start-Up Operation from Anaerobic Digestion of Acidified Palm Oil Mill Effluent," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:13:p:2473-:d:243298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/13/2473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/13/2473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chin, May Ji & Poh, Phaik Eong & Tey, Beng Ti & Chan, Eng Seng & Chin, Kit Ling, 2013. "Biogas from palm oil mill effluent (POME): Opportunities and challenges from Malaysia's perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 717-726.
    2. Anahita Rabii & Saad Aldin & Yaser Dahman & Elsayed Elbeshbishy, 2019. "A Review on Anaerobic Co-Digestion with a Focus on the Microbial Populations and the Effect of Multi-Stage Digester Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdullah Nsair & Senem Onen Cinar & Ayah Alassali & Hani Abu Qdais & Kerstin Kuchta, 2020. "Operational Parameters of Biogas Plants: A Review and Evaluation Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Sivabalan Kaniapan & Jagadeesh Pasupuleti & Kartikeyan Patma Nesan & Haris Nalakath Abubackar & Hadiza Aminu Umar & Temidayo Lekan Oladosu & Segun R. Bello & Eldon R. Rene, 2022. "A Review of the Sustainable Utilization of Rice Residues for Bioenergy Conversion Using Different Valorization Techniques, Their Challenges, and Techno-Economic Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Chong, Daniel Jia Sheng & Chan, Yi Jing & Arumugasamy, Senthil Kumar & Yazdi, Sara Kazemi & Lim, Jun Wei, 2023. "Optimisation and performance evaluation of response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) in the prediction of biogas production ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Katarzyna Ignatowicz & Jacek Piekarski & Paweł Kogut, 2021. "Influence of Selected Substrate Dosage on the Process of Biogas Installation Start-Up in Real Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-11, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amar Naji & Sabrina Guérin Rechdaoui & Elise Jabagi & Carlyne Lacroix & Sam Azimi & Vincent Rocher, 2023. "Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Wastewater Sludge with Lignocellulosic Waste: A Study of Performance and Limits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Roberto Eloy Hernández Regalado & Jurek Häner & Elmar Brügging & Jens Tränckner, 2022. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Solid–Liquid Biogas Treatment Plants for the Agro-Industrial Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2014. "Development of biogas combustion in combined heat and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 868-875.
    4. Obianuju Patience Ilo & Mulala Danny Simatele & S’phumelele Lucky Nkomo & Ntandoyenkosi Malusi Mkhize & Nagendra Gopinath Prabhu, 2021. "Methodological Approaches to Optimising Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth for Energy Efficiency in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Nur Izzah Hamna A. Aziz & Marlia M. Hanafiah & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Haikal Ismail, 2020. "Bioenergy for a Cleaner Future: A Case Study of Sustainable Biogas Supply Chain in the Malaysian Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Jasmine Sie Ming Tiong & Yi Jing Chan & Jun Wei Lim & Mardawani Mohamad & Chii-Dong Ho & Anisa Ur Rahmah & Worapon Kiatkittipong & Wipoo Sriseubsai & Izumi Kumakiri, 2021. "Simulation and Optimization of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Palm Oil Mill Effluent for Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Milano, Jassinnee & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Masjuki, H.H. & Chong, W.T. & Lam, Man Kee & Loh, Ping Kwan & Vellayan, Viknes, 2016. "Microalgae biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuel for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 180-197.
    8. Vasmara, Ciro & Marchetti, Rosa & Carminati, Domenico, 2021. "Wastewater from the production of lactic acid bacteria as feedstock in anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Alia Samsudin & Mohd Armi Abu Samah & Mohd Yusuff Ishak, 2019. "Perception Of Government Servants In Shah Alam On The Utilization Of Food Waste As A Resource For Biogas Production In Malaysia," Journal Clean WAS (JCleanWAS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 16-20, March.
    10. Krystyna Lelicińska-Serafin & Piotr Manczarski & Anna Rolewicz-Kalińska, 2023. "An Insight into Post-Consumer Food Waste Characteristics as the Key to an Organic Recycling Method Selection in a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Khatun, Rahima & Reza, Mohammad Imam Hasan & Moniruzzaman, M. & Yaakob, Zahira, 2017. "Sustainable oil palm industry: The possibilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 608-619.
    12. Theresa Menzel & Peter Neubauer & Stefan Junne, 2020. "Role of Microbial Hydrolysis in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    13. Sangmin Kim & Seung-Gyun Woo & Joonyeob Lee & Dae-Hee Lee & Seokhwan Hwang, 2019. "Evaluation of Feasibility of Using the Bacteriophage T4 Lysozyme to Improve the Hydrolysis and Biochemical Methane Potential of Secondary Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Aravani, Vasiliki P. & Sun, Hangyu & Yang, Ziyi & Liu, Guangqing & Wang, Wen & Anagnostopoulos, George & Syriopoulos, George & Charisiou, Nikolaos D. & Goula, Maria A. & Kornaros, Michael & Papadakis,, 2022. "Agricultural and livestock sector's residues in Greece & China: Comparative qualitative and quantitative characterization for assessing their potential for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Chien Bong, Cassendra Phun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Chin Siong & Peng Tan, William Soo & Lee, Chew Tin, 2017. "Review on the renewable energy and solid waste management policies towards biogas development in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 988-998.
    16. Bundhoo, Zumar M.A. & Mauthoor, Sumayya & Mohee, Romeela, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from biomass and waste materials in the Small Island Developing State of Mauritius," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1087-1100.
    17. Abdul Aziz, Nur Izzah Hamna & Hanafiah, Marlia M. & Mohamed Ali, Mohamed Yasreen, 2019. "Sustainable biogas production from agrowaste and effluents – A promising step for small-scale industry income," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 363-369.
    18. Phuang, Zhen Xin & Woon, Kok Sin & Wong, Khai Jian & Liew, Peng Yen & Hanafiah, Marlia Mohd, 2021. "Unlocking the environmental hotspots of palm biodiesel upstream production in Malaysia via life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    19. Zain, Munirah Md & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2018. "An overview on conversion technologies to produce value added products from CH4 and CO2 as major biogas constituents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 56-63.
    20. Kumaran, Palanisamy & Hephzibah, David & Sivasankari, Ranganathan & Saifuddin, Normanbay & Shamsuddin, Abd. Halim, 2016. "A review on industrial scale anaerobic digestion systems deployment in Malaysia: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 929-940.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:13:p:2473-:d:243298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.