IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i19p7265-d932641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas Power Generation from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME): Techno-Economic and Environmental Impact Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Ahyahudin Sodri

    (School of Environmental Science, University of Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia)

  • Fentinur Evida Septriana

    (Environment and Forestry Agency of Bangka Belitung Islands, Pangkalpinang 33149, Indonesia)

Abstract

Using palm oil mill effluent (POME) to produce biogas is an alternative and sustainable way to control POME GHG emissions while also providing economic benefits. The increasing area of oil palm plantations encourages an increase in palm oil production and the generation of POME in Indonesia. This could increase potential GHG emissions and global warming. In contrast, biogas power plants from POME are less attractive for economic investment in Indonesia. However, as the world’s largest palm oil producer, Indonesia still lacks techno-economic and environmental studies of biogas power generation from POME. This study aimed to evaluate the technical, economic, and environmental aspects of the biogas power generation from POME at the study site (Bangka Island, Indonesia). The result shows that the biogas plant at the study site can reduce COD levels of POME by up to 91% and produce biogas at 325,292 m 3 /month, with a 55% methane content. Biogas can be converted into electrical energy at 696,163 kWh/month. The operation of this biogas plant can reduce GHG emissions by 1131 tons CO 2 -eq/month, with low profitability (NPV of IDR—1,281,136,274, IRR 6.75%, and a payback period of 10.8 years). This evaluation proves that the main problem in the factory is the POME used, which is insufficient, and which could be overcome by purchasing POME from other palm oil mills. Furthermore, using the mesophilic anaerobic degradation process at the study site is feasible. However, a technological shift from closed lagoons to more efficient bioreactors is urgently needed, to increase the process efficiency and economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahyahudin Sodri & Fentinur Evida Septriana, 2022. "Biogas Power Generation from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME): Techno-Economic and Environmental Impact Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7265-:d:932641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nzila, Charles & Dewulf, Jo & Spanjers, Henri & Tuigong, David & Kiriamiti, Henry & van Langenhove, Herman, 2012. "Multi criteria sustainability assessment of biogas production in Kenya," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 496-506.
    2. A Aziz, Md Maniruzzaman & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & ElSergany, Moetaz & Anuar, Syed & Jorat, M. Ehsan & Yaacob, H. & Ahsan, Amimul & Imteaz, Monzur A. & Arifuzzaman,, 2020. "Recent advances on palm oil mill effluent (POME) pretreatment and anaerobic reactor for sustainable biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Chin, May Ji & Poh, Phaik Eong & Tey, Beng Ti & Chan, Eng Seng & Chin, Kit Ling, 2013. "Biogas from palm oil mill effluent (POME): Opportunities and challenges from Malaysia's perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 717-726.
    4. Khalil, Munawar & Berawi, Mohammed Ali & Heryanto, Rudi & Rizalie, Akhmad, 2019. "Waste to energy technology: The potential of sustainable biogas production from animal waste in Indonesia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 323-331.
    5. Stich, J. & Ramachandran, S. & Hamacher, T. & Stimming, U., 2017. "Techno-economic estimation of the power generation potential from biomass residues in Southeast Asia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 930-942.
    6. Akbulut, Abdullah, 2012. "Techno-economic analysis of electricity and heat generation from farm-scale biogas plant: Çiçekdağı case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 381-390.
    7. Choong, Yee Yaw & Chou, Kian Weng & Norli, Ismail, 2018. "Strategies for improving biogas production of palm oil mill effluent (POME) anaerobic digestion: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2993-3006.
    8. Divya, D. & Gopinath, L.R. & Merlin Christy, P., 2015. "A review on current aspects and diverse prospects for enhancing biogas production in sustainable means," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 690-699.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu Yang & Yi Xia & Xijuan Yu & Huifeng Zhang & Xuming Lin & Hongxia Ma & Yuze Du & Haiying Dong, 2022. "Optimal Dispatch of Agricultural Integrated Energy System with Hybrid Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Advantages and Limitations of Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment—Technological Basics, Development Directions, and Technological Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-39, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stolecka, Katarzyna & Rusin, Andrzej, 2021. "Potential hazards posed by biogas plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Phuang, Zhen Xin & Woon, Kok Sin & Wong, Khai Jian & Liew, Peng Yen & Hanafiah, Marlia Mohd, 2021. "Unlocking the environmental hotspots of palm biodiesel upstream production in Malaysia via life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Gourich, Wail & Chan, Eng-Seng & Ng, Wei Zhe & Obon, Aaron Anthony & Maran, Kireshwen & Ong, Yi Hui & Lee, Chin Loong & Tan, Jully & Song, Cher Pin, 2022. "Life cycle benefits of enzymatic biodiesel co-produced in palm oil mills from sludge palm oil as renewable fuel for rural electrification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    4. A Aziz, Md Maniruzzaman & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & ElSergany, Moetaz & Anuar, Syed & Jorat, M. Ehsan & Yaacob, H. & Ahsan, Amimul & Imteaz, Monzur A. & Arifuzzaman,, 2020. "Recent advances on palm oil mill effluent (POME) pretreatment and anaerobic reactor for sustainable biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Namuli, R. & Pillay, P. & Jaumard, B. & Laflamme, C.B., 2013. "Threshold herd size for commercial viability of biomass waste to energy conversion systems on rural farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 308-322.
    6. Djatkov, Djordje & Effenberger, Mathias & Martinov, Milan, 2014. "Method for assessing and improving the efficiency of agricultural biogas plants based on fuzzy logic and expert systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 163-175.
    7. Sani, L. & Khatiwada, D. & Harahap, F. & Silveira, S., 2021. "Decarbonization pathways for the power sector in Sumatra, Indonesia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Tan, Yue Dian & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah, 2020. "Multi-objective optimal design for integrated palm oil mill complex with consideration of effluent elimination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Dar, R.A. & Parmar, M. & Dar, E.A. & Sani, R.K. & Phutela, U.G., 2021. "Biomethanation of agricultural residues: Potential, limitations and possible solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Tan, Yue Dian & Lim, Jeng Shiun, 2019. "Feasibility of palm oil mill effluent elimination towards sustainable Malaysian palm oil industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 507-522.
    11. Patrizio, P. & Leduc, S. & Chinese, D. & Kraxner, F., 2017. "Internalizing the external costs of biogas supply chains in the Italian energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 85-96.
    12. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2014. "Development of biogas combustion in combined heat and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 868-875.
    13. Sharvini, Siva Raman & Noor, Zainura Zainon & Chong, Chun Shiong & Stringer, Lindsay C & Glew, David, 2020. "Energy generation from palm oil mill effluent: A life cycle assessment of two biogas technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Zhilong Wei & Lei Wang & Hu Liu & Zihao Liu & Haisheng Zhen, 2021. "Numerical Investigation on the Flame Structure and CO/NO Formations of the Laminar Premixed Biogas–Hydrogen Impinging Flame in the Wall Vicinity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    16. Safieddin Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad, 2020. "Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 29-37.
    17. Avaci, Angelica Buzinaro & Melegari de Souza, Samuel Nelson & Werncke, Ivan & Chaves, Luiz Inácio, 2013. "Financial economic scenario for the microgeneration of electric energy from swine culture-originated biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 272-276.
    18. Ghaem Sigarchian, Sara & Paleta, Rita & Malmquist, Anders & Pina, André, 2015. "Feasibility study of using a biogas engine as backup in a decentralized hybrid (PV/wind/battery) power generation system – Case study Kenya," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1830-1841.
    19. Nur Izzah Hamna A. Aziz & Marlia M. Hanafiah & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Haikal Ismail, 2020. "Bioenergy for a Cleaner Future: A Case Study of Sustainable Biogas Supply Chain in the Malaysian Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Maciej Kuboń & Monika Komorowska, 2020. "The Effect of the Addition of a Fat Emulsifier on the Amount and Quality of the Obtained Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7265-:d:932641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.