IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i9p2437-d169762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixed Kernel Function Support Vector Regression with Genetic Algorithm for Forecasting Dissolved Gas Content in Power Transformers

Author

Listed:
  • Tusongjiang Kari

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Wensheng Gao

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Ayiguzhali Tuluhong

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Yilihamu Yaermaimaiti

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Ziwei Zhang

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Forecasting dissolved gas content in power transformers plays a significant role in detecting incipient faults and maintaining the safety of the power system. Though various forecasting models have been developed, there is still room to further improve prediction performance. In this paper, a new forecasting model is proposed by combining mixed kernel function-based support vector regression (MKF-SVR) and genetic algorithm (GA). First, forecasting performance of SVR models constructed with a single kernel are compared, and then Gaussian kernel and polynomial kernel are retained due to better learning and prediction ability. Next, a mixed kernel, which integrates a Gaussian kernel with a polynomial kernel, is used to establish a SVR-based forecasting model. Genetic algorithm (GA) and leave-one-out cross validation are employed to determine the free parameters of MKF-SVR, while mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and squared correlation coefficient ( r 2 ) are applied to assess the quality of the parameters. The proposed model is implemented on a practical dissolved gas dataset and promising results are obtained. Finally, the forecasting performance of the proposed model is compared with three other approaches, including RBFNN, GRNN and GM. The experimental and comparison results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms other popular models in terms of forecasting accuracy and fitting capability.

Suggested Citation

  • Tusongjiang Kari & Wensheng Gao & Ayiguzhali Tuluhong & Yilihamu Yaermaimaiti & Ziwei Zhang, 2018. "Mixed Kernel Function Support Vector Regression with Genetic Algorithm for Forecasting Dissolved Gas Content in Power Transformers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:2437-:d:169762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weron, Rafał, 2014. "Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1030-1081.
    2. Seunghyeon Wang & Hyeonyong Hae & Juhyung Kim, 2018. "Development of Easily Accessible Electricity Consumption Model Using Open Data and GA-SVR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Chao Li & Rongrong Zhai & Yongping Yang, 2017. "Optimization of a Heliostat Field Layout on Annual Basis Using a Hybrid Algorithm Combining Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Genetic Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Liu, Yuan & Wang, RuiXue, 2016. "Study on network traffic forecast model of SVR optimized by GAFSA," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 153-159.
    5. Jun Lin & Gehao Sheng & Yingjie Yan & Jiejie Dai & Xiuchen Jiang, 2018. "Prediction of Dissolved Gas Concentrations in Transformer Oil Based on the KPCA-FFOA-GRNN Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Min-Liang Huang, 2016. "Hybridization of Chaotic Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization with SVR in Electric Demand Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Bin Wang & Zhongping Yang & Fei Lin & Wei Zhao, 2014. "An Improved Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Stationary Energy Storage System Locating and Sizing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Weide Li & Xuan Yang & Hao Li & Lili Su, 2017. "Hybrid Forecasting Approach Based on GRNN Neural Network and SVR Machine for Electricity Demand Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Li-Ling Peng & Guo-Feng Fan & Min-Liang Huang & Wei-Chiang Hong, 2016. "Hybridizing DEMD and Quantum PSO with SVR in Electric Load Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Lefeng Cheng & Tao Yu, 2018. "Dissolved Gas Analysis Principle-Based Intelligent Approaches to Fault Diagnosis and Decision Making for Large Oil-Immersed Power Transformers: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-69, April.
    11. Fabio Henrique Pereira & Francisco Elânio Bezerra & Shigueru Junior & Josemir Santos & Ivan Chabu & Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza & Fábio Micerino & Silvio Ikuyo Nabeta, 2018. "Nonlinear Autoregressive Neural Network Models for Prediction of Transformer Oil-Dissolved Gas Concentrations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, June.
    12. Ehsan Gholamalizadeh & Man-Hoe Kim, 2016. "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Solar Chimney Power Plant with Inclined Collector Roof Using Genetic Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdulelah Alkesaiberi & Fouzi Harrou & Ying Sun, 2022. "Efficient Wind Power Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods: A Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    2. José de Jesús Jaramillo Serna & Jesús M. López-Lezama, 2019. "Calculation of Distance Protection Settings in Mutually Coupled Transmission Lines: A Comparative Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-32, April.
    3. Xiangbing Gao & Bo Jia & Gen Li & Xiaojing Ma, 2022. "Calorific Value Forecasting of Coal Gangue with Hybrid Kernel Function–Support Vector Regression and Genetic Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Teke Gush & Syed Basit Ali Bukhari & Khawaja Khalid Mehmood & Samuel Admasie & Ji-Soo Kim & Chul-Hwan Kim, 2019. "Intelligent Fault Classification and Location Identification Method for Microgrids Using Discrete Orthonormal Stockwell Transform-Based Optimized Multi-Kernel Extreme Learning Machine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José de Jesús Jaramillo Serna & Jesús M. López-Lezama, 2019. "Calculation of Distance Protection Settings in Mutually Coupled Transmission Lines: A Comparative Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-32, April.
    2. Enwen Li & Linong Wang & Bin Song & Siliang Jian, 2018. "Improved Fuzzy C-Means Clustering for Transformer Fault Diagnosis Using Dissolved Gas Analysis Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Fang Yuan & Jiang Guo & Zhihuai Xiao & Bing Zeng & Wenqiang Zhu & Sixu Huang, 2020. "An Interval Forecasting Model Based on Phase Space Reconstruction and Weighted Least Squares Support Vector Machine for Time Series of Dissolved Gas Content in Transformer Oil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Chengshi Tian & Yan Hao, 2018. "A Novel Nonlinear Combined Forecasting System for Short-Term Load Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-34, March.
    5. Cheng-Wen Lee & Bing-Yi Lin, 2017. "Applications of the Chaotic Quantum Genetic Algorithm with Support Vector Regression in Load Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Bing Zeng & Jiang Guo & Fangqing Zhang & Wenqiang Zhu & Zhihuai Xiao & Sixu Huang & Peng Fan, 2020. "Prediction Model for Dissolved Gas Concentration in Transformer Oil Based on Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer and LSSVM with Grey Relational Analysis and Empirical Mode Decomposition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Xing Liu & Jinhua Du & Deliang Liang, 2016. "Analysis and Speed Ripple Mitigation of a Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation-Based Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with a Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Wenting Zhao & Juanjuan Zhao & Xilong Yao & Zhixin Jin & Pan Wang, 2019. "A Novel Adaptive Intelligent Ensemble Model for Forecasting Primary Energy Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Fabio Henrique Pereira & Francisco Elânio Bezerra & Shigueru Junior & Josemir Santos & Ivan Chabu & Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza & Fábio Micerino & Silvio Ikuyo Nabeta, 2018. "Nonlinear Autoregressive Neural Network Models for Prediction of Transformer Oil-Dissolved Gas Concentrations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Ming-Wei Li & Jing Geng & Shumei Wang & Wei-Chiang Hong, 2017. "Hybrid Chaotic Quantum Bat Algorithm with SVR in Electric Load Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Minghui Ou & Hua Wei & Yiyi Zhang & Jiancheng Tan, 2019. "A Dynamic Adam Based Deep Neural Network for Fault Diagnosis of Oil-Immersed Power Transformers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Lavička, Hynek & Kracík, Jiří, 2020. "Fluctuation analysis of electric power loads in Europe: Correlation multifractality vs. Distribution function multifractality," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    13. Smyl, Slawek, 2020. "A hybrid method of exponential smoothing and recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 75-85.
    14. Miguel Ángel Rodríguez López & Diego Rodríguez Rodríguez, 2024. "La aplicación de datos masivos en economía de la energía: una revisión," Working Papers 2024-08, FEDEA.
    15. Billé, Anna Gloria & Gianfreda, Angelica & Del Grosso, Filippo & Ravazzolo, Francesco, 2023. "Forecasting electricity prices with expert, linear, and nonlinear models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 570-586.
    16. Uniejewski, Bartosz & Maciejowska, Katarzyna, 2023. "LASSO principal component averaging: A fully automated approach for point forecast pooling," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1839-1852.
    17. Benedikt Finnah, 2022. "Optimal bidding functions for renewable energies in sequential electricity markets," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Yajing Gao & Xiaojie Zhou & Jiafeng Ren & Zheng Zhao & Fushen Xue, 2018. "Electricity Purchase Optimization Decision Based on Data Mining and Bayesian Game," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    19. David Roch-Dupré & Carlos Camacho-Gómez & Asunción P. Cucala & Silvia Jiménez-Fernández & Álvaro López-López & Antonio Portilla-Figueras & Ramón R. Pecharromán & Antonio Fernández-Cardador & Sancho Sa, 2021. "Optimal Location and Sizing of Energy Storage Systems in DC-Electrified Railway Lines Using a Coral Reefs Optimization Algorithm with Substrate Layers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Afanasyev, Dmitriy O. & Fedorova, Elena A., 2019. "On the impact of outlier filtering on the electricity price forecasting accuracy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 196-210.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:2437-:d:169762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.