IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i8p2135-d164074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment Strategy and Multi–Objective Optimization Scheme for Premium Power under the Background of the Opening of Electric Retail Side

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanqian Ma

    (College of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Xianyong Xiao

    (College of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Ying Wang

    (College of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

With the opening of electric retail side, premium power value-added service has become a main concern for both sensitive customers (SCs) and new electric retail companies (NERCs). However, due to the lack of appropriate investment strategy and optimal premium power investment scheme (PPIS) determination method, the premium power market is difficult to form, thus SCs’ demand for premium power is difficult to meet. Under such condition, how to determine the investment strategy and choose the optimal PPIS are problems that need to be solved. Motivated by this, this paper proposes a multi–participant premium power investment strategy and an optimal PPIS determination method. Suppose that the NERC and the corresponding SCs have already been determined, according to two–sided matching theory, taking SCs’ and NERC’s disappointment–rejoicing psychological perceptions into consideration, premium power perceived utility (PU) (i.e., the perceived effectiveness or satisfaction degree) can be obtained, and a multi-objective optimization model of investment scheme is established. Finally, a field survey has been conducted by the authors on typical high-tech manufacturers (HTMs) located in a High-Tech Park in Sichuan, China. The matching results have been verified by the actual survey. The proposed method is a good way to manage the premium power market.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanqian Ma & Xianyong Xiao & Ying Wang, 2018. "Investment Strategy and Multi–Objective Optimization Scheme for Premium Power under the Background of the Opening of Electric Retail Side," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2135-:d:164074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dung Vo Tien & Radomir Gono & Zbigniew Leonowicz, 2018. "A Multifunctional Dynamic Voltage Restorer for Power Quality Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Kunaifi & Angèle Reinders, 2018. "Perceived and Reported Reliability of the Electricity Supply at Three Urban Locations in Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Zahra Pooranian & Jemal H. Abawajy & Vinod P & Mauro Conti, 2018. "Scheduling Distributed Energy Resource Operation and Daily Power Consumption for a Smart Building to Optimize Economic and Environmental Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Alvin E. Roth & Uriel G. Rothblum & John H. Vande Vate, 1993. "Stable Matchings, Optimal Assignments, and Linear Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 803-828, November.
    5. Haslett, D. W., 1990. "What is Utility?," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 65-94, April.
    6. Philippe Delquié & Alessandra Cillo, 2006. "Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 197-215, December.
    7. Michal Wydra, 2018. "Performance and Accuracy Investigation of the Two-Step Algorithm for Power System State and Line Temperature Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Shin, Jeong-Shik, 1985. "Perception of Price When Price Information Is Costly: Evidence from Residential Electricity Demand," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 67(4), pages 591-598, November.
    9. Carlos Laciana & Elke Weber, 2008. "Correcting expected utility for comparisons between alternative outcomes: A unified parameterization of regret and disappointment," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Roth, Alvin E., 1985. "Common and conflicting interests in two-sided matching markets," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 75-96, February.
    11. Rafael Cisneros-Magaña & Aurelio Medina & Olimpo Anaya-Lara, 2018. "Time-Domain Voltage Sag State Estimation Based on the Unscented Kalman Filter for Power Systems with Nonlinear Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Tianlei Zang & Yueping Xiang & Jianwei Yang, 2017. "The Tripartite Game Model for Electricity Pricing in Consideration of the Power Quality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Seyedeh Narjes Fallah & Ravinesh Chand Deo & Mohammad Shojafar & Mauro Conti & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2018. "Computational Intelligence Approaches for Energy Load Forecasting in Smart Energy Management Grids: State of the Art, Future Challenges, and Research Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-31, March.
    14. Yongchun Yang & Xiangning Xiao & Shixiao Guo & Yajing Gao & Chang Yuan & Wenhai Yang, 2018. "Energy Storage Characteristic Analysis of Voltage Sags Compensation for UPQC Based on MMC for Medium Voltage Distribution System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandre Serrano-Fontova & Pablo Casals Torrens & Ricard Bosch, 2019. "Power Quality Disturbances Assessment during Unintentional Islanding Scenarios. A Contribution to Voltage Sag Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Heekwon Yang & Byeol Kim & Joosung Lee & Yonghan Ahn & Chankil Lee, 2018. "Advanced Wireless Sensor Networks for Sustainable Buildings Using Building Ducts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Han Bleichrodt & Peter P. Wakker, 2015. "Regret Theory: A Bold Alternative to the Alternatives," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(583), pages 493-532, March.
    4. Christine Milchram & Geerten Van de Kaa & Neelke Doorn & Rolf Künneke, 2018. "Moral Values as Factors for Social Acceptance of Smart Grid Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Zhaobin Du & Zhuo Chen & Guanquan Dai & Mohammed Yaqoob Javed & Chuanyong Shao & Haoqin Zhan, 2019. "Influence of DVR on Adjacent Load and Its Compensation Strategy Design Based on Externality Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Bo Li & Yudong Wang & Jian Li & Shengxian Cao, 2018. "A Fully Distributed Approach for Economic Dispatch Problem of Smart Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Cheung, K.C. & Chong, W.F. & Yam, S.C.P., 2015. "The optimal insurance under disappointment theories," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 77-90.
    8. Holman Bueno-Contreras & Germán Andrés Ramos & Ramon Costa-Castelló, 2021. "Power Quality Improvement through a UPQC and a Resonant Observer-Based MIMO Control Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Martín Egozcue & Xu Guo & Wing-Keung Wong, 2015. "Optimal output for the regret-averse competitive firm under price uncertainty," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 279-295, December.
    10. Antoinette Baujard, 2016. "Utilitarianism and anti-utilitarianism," Chapters, in: Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume III, chapter 40, pages 576-588, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Céline Nauges & Arnaud Reynaud, 2001. "Estimation de la demande domestique d'eau potable en France," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 52(1), pages 167-185.
    12. Fleiner, Tamas, 2003. "On the stable b-matching polytope," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 149-158, October.
    13. Liang Lu & David Deller & Morten Hviid, 2019. "Price and Behavioural Signals to Encourage Household Water Conservation: Implications for the UK," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(2), pages 475-491, January.
    14. Arbues, Fernando & Garcia-Valinas, Maria Angeles & Martinez-Espineira, Roberto, 2003. "Estimation of residential water demand: a state-of-the-art review," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 81-102, March.
    15. Acuña, Guillermo, 2017. "Elasticidades de la demanda de agua en Chile [Elasticities of water demand in Chile]," MPRA Paper 82916, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Ngo Minh Khoa & Doan Duc Tung, 2018. "Locating Fault on Transmission Line with Static Var Compensator Based on Phasor Measurement Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Nataraj, Shanthi & Hanemann, W. Michael, 2011. "Does marginal price matter? A regression discontinuity approach to estimating water demand," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 198-212, March.
    18. Alberini, Anna & Bezhanishvili, Levan & Ščasný, Milan, 2022. "“Wild” tariff schemes: Evidence from the Republic of Georgia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    19. Marie-Estelle Binet & Fabrizio Carlevaro & Michel Paul, 2014. "Estimation of Residential Water Demand with Imperfect Price Perception," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(4), pages 561-581, December.
    20. Enrico G. De Giorgi & Thierry Post, 2011. "Loss Aversion with a State-Dependent Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1094-1110, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2135-:d:164074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.