IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i6p1427-d150361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Resilience Assessment under a Tri-Stage Framework for Power Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Han Zhang

    (The State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, the Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Smart Grid, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Hanjie Yuan

    (The State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, the Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Smart Grid, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Gengfeng Li

    (The State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, the Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Smart Grid, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Yanling Lin

    (The State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, the Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Smart Grid, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

The frequent occurrence of natural disasters and malicious attacks has exerted unprecedented disturbances on power systems, accounting for the extensive attention paid to power system resilience. Combined with the evolving nature of general disasters, this paper proposes resilience assessment approaches for power systems under a tri-stage framework. The pre-disaster toughness is proposed to quantify the robustness of power systems against potential disasters, where the thinking of area division and partitioned multi-objective risk method (PMRM) is introduced. In the case of information deficiency caused by disasters, the during-disaster resistance to disturbance is calculated to reflect the real-time system running state by state estimation (SE). The post-disaster restoration ability consists of response ability, restoration efficiency and restoration economy, which is evaluated by Sequential Monte-Carlo Simulation to simulate the system restoration process. Further, a synthetic metric system is presented to quantify the resilience performance of power systems from the above three aspects. The proposed approaches and framework are validated on the IEEE RTS 79 system, and helpful conclusions are drawn from extensive case studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Zhang & Hanjie Yuan & Gengfeng Li & Yanling Lin, 2018. "Quantitative Resilience Assessment under a Tri-Stage Framework for Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1427-:d:150361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1427/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1427/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan, Mengfei & Zeng, Zhiguo & Zio, Enrico & Kang, Rui & Chen, Ying, 2018. "A stochastic hybrid systems model of common-cause failures of degrading components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 159-170.
    2. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & D’Urso, Diego & Famoso, Fabio & Brusca, Sebastian & Aizpurua, Jose Ignacio & Catterson, Victoria M., 2018. "On the use of dynamic reliability for an accurate modelling of renewable power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 605-621.
    3. Cadini, Francesco & Agliardi, Gian Luca & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "A modeling and simulation framework for the reliability/availability assessment of a power transmission grid subject to cascading failures under extreme weather conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 267-279.
    4. Whitson, John C. & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2009. "Resiliency as a component importance measure in network reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1685-1693.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Plotnek, Jordan J. & Slay, Jill, 2021. "Power systems resilience: Definition and taxonomy with a view towards metrics," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    2. Xue, Jiayue & Mohammadi, Farshad & Li, Xin & Sahraei-Ardakani, Mostafa & Ou, Ge & Pu, Zhaoxia, 2020. "Impact of transmission tower-line interaction to the bulk power system during hurricane," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Adel Mottahedi & Farhang Sereshki & Mohammad Ataei & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi, 2021. "The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    5. Han Zhang & Gengfeng Li & Hanjie Yuan, 2018. "Collaborative Optimization of Post-Disaster Damage Repair and Power System Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Firouzi, Mohsen & Samimi, Abouzar & Salami, Abolfazl, 2022. "Reliability evaluation of a composite power system in the presence of renewable generations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Jufri, Fauzan Hanif & Widiputra, Victor & Jung, Jaesung, 2019. "State-of-the-art review on power grid resilience to extreme weather events: Definitions, frameworks, quantitative assessment methodologies, and enhancement strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1049-1065.
    3. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & Iacono, Alessandra & Compagno, Lucio & D'Urso, Diego, 2020. "A general framework for dependability modelling coupling discrete-event and time-driven simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Zhu, Jianhua & Peng, Yan & Gong, Zhuping & Sun, Yanming & Lai, Chaoan & Wang, Qing & Zhu, Xiaojun & Gan, Zhongxue, 2019. "Dynamic analysis of SNG and PNG supply: The stability and robustness view #," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 717-729.
    5. Fauzan Hanif Jufri & Jun-Sung Kim & Jaesung Jung, 2017. "Analysis of Determinants of the Impact and the Grid Capability to Evaluate and Improve Grid Resilience from Extreme Weather Event," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Hindolo George-Williams & Geng Feng & Frank PA Coolen & Michael Beer & Edoardo Patelli, 2019. "Extending the survival signature paradigm to complex systems with non-repairable dependent failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 505-519, August.
    8. Baroud, Hiba & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2014. "Importance measures for inland waterway network resilience," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 55-67.
    9. El-Sharafy, M. Zaki & Farag, Hany E.Z., 2017. "Back-feed power restoration using distributed constraint optimization in smart distribution grids clustered into microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1102-1117.
    10. Yi‐Ping Fang & Giovanni Sansavini & Enrico Zio, 2019. "An Optimization‐Based Framework for the Identification of Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Grids Exposed to Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1949-1969, September.
    11. Heng Ye & Zhiping Li & Guangyue Li & Yiran Liu, 2022. "Topology Analysis of Natural Gas Pipeline Networks Based on Complex Network Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Xiang He & Yongbo Yuan, 2019. "A Framework of Identifying Critical Water Distribution Pipelines from Recovery Resilience," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(11), pages 3691-3706, September.
    13. Hossain, Eklas & Roy, Shidhartho & Mohammad, Naeem & Nawar, Nafiu & Dipta, Debopriya Roy, 2021. "Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliability during natural disasters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    14. Banghua Xie & Changfan Li & Zili Wu & Weiming Chen, 2021. "Topological Modeling Research on the Functional Vulnerability of Power Grid under Extreme Weather," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Castet, Jean-Francois & Saleh, Joseph H., 2012. "On the concept of survivability, with application to spacecraft and space-based networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 123-138.
    16. Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne & Coit, David, 2023. "Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    17. Wang, Jing & Zuo, Wangda & Rhode-Barbarigos, Landolf & Lu, Xing & Wang, Jianhui & Lin, Yanling, 2019. "Literature review on modeling and simulation of energy infrastructures from a resilience perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 360-373.
    18. Ferdinando Chiacchio & Fabio Famoso & Diego D’Urso & Luca Cedola, 2019. "Performance and Economic Assessment of a Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Power Plant with a Storage System: A Comparison between the North and the South of Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    19. Su, Huai & Zhang, Jinjun & Zio, Enrico & Yang, Nan & Li, Xueyi & Zhang, Zongjie, 2018. "An integrated systemic method for supply reliability assessment of natural gas pipeline networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 489-501.
    20. Li, Jian & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo & Chen, Changkun & Shi, Congling, 2017. "AC power flow importance measures considering multi-element failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 89-97.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1427-:d:150361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.