IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i6p1418-d150120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Investigation of Static Stall Hysteresis and 3-Dimensional Flow Structures for an NREL S826 Wing Section of Finite Span

Author

Listed:
  • Hamid Sarlak

    (Section of Fluid Mechanics, Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Ariane Frère

    (Institute of Mechanics, Materials and Civil Engineering, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
    Research Center En Aeronautique (Cenaero), 6041 Gosselies, Belgium)

  • Robert Mikkelsen

    (Section of Fluid Mechanics, Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Jens N. Sørensen

    (Section of Fluid Mechanics, Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

Abstract

Flow characteristics of an S826 airfoil at different Reynolds numbers, ranging from 40,000–400,000 (based on airfoil chord length) and angles of attack from −10–25 degrees are thoroughly investigated in a low-speed wind tunnel. The airfoil’s lift and drag polars are first measured, and with a focus on pitching the airfoil in upstroke and downstroke orders, static stall hysteresis is identified in selected experiments at Reynolds numbers below 100,000 near the stall angle and subsequently investigated. Experiments using wire-generated free stream turbulence are conducted, and the hysteresis effects are shown to disappear when introducing a free stream turbulence of less than 2.5%. Further, spanwise flow is detected by comparing lift and drag values measured using both surface pressure integration at one cross section as well as integral force gauge measurement, and the surface oil flow visualization technique is subsequently used to study the 3D flow topologies formed on the airfoil. The formation of distinct stall cells on the suction side of the airfoil is observed at Reynolds numbers above 100,000 near the stall angle. By repeating the experiments, stall cells are proven to be reproduceable, although the identical geometries are necessarily not retained in abscence of surface impurities such as tapes. The effect of disturbances on the stall cells is investigated by utilizing roughness elements on the airfoil surface, and it is found that while such disturbances tend to change the shape of the stall cells, they do not contribute to the creation, nor destruction of the cells. Polar and visualisation measurements are also used to study flow separation, and it is observed that the separation location, as well as the laminar separation bubble, moves towards the leading edge when increasing the angle of attack.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamid Sarlak & Ariane Frère & Robert Mikkelsen & Jens N. Sørensen, 2018. "Experimental Investigation of Static Stall Hysteresis and 3-Dimensional Flow Structures for an NREL S826 Wing Section of Finite Span," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1418-:d:150120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1418/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1418/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarlak, H. & Meneveau, C. & Sørensen, J.N., 2015. "Role of subgrid-scale modeling in large eddy simulation of wind turbine wake interactions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 386-399.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrés Meana-Fernández & Jesús Manuel Fernández Oro & Katia María Argüelles Díaz & Sandra Velarde-Suárez, 2019. "Turbulence-Model Comparison for Aerodynamic-Performance Prediction of a Typical Vertical-Axis Wind-Turbine Airfoil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rezaeiha, Abdolrahim & Micallef, Daniel, 2021. "Wake interactions of two tandem floating offshore wind turbines: CFD analysis using actuator disc model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 859-876.
    2. Li, Qing'an & Maeda, Takao & Kamada, Yasunari & Mori, Naoya, 2017. "Investigation of wake characteristics of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine in vertical axis direction with field experiments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 262-272.
    3. Sarlak, H. & Nishino, T. & Martínez-Tossas, L.A. & Meneveau, C. & Sørensen, J.N., 2016. "Assessment of blockage effects on the wake characteristics and power of wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 340-352.
    4. Deskos, Georgios & Laizet, Sylvain & Piggott, Matthew D., 2019. "Turbulence-resolving simulations of wind turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 989-1002.
    5. Xu Ning & Decheng Wan, 2019. "LES Study of Wake Meandering in Different Atmospheric Stabilities and Its Effects on Wind Turbine Aerodynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Victor P. Stein & Hans-Jakob Kaltenbach, 2022. "Validation of a Large-Eddy Simulation Approach for Prediction of the Ground Roughness Influence on Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Rafael V. Rodrigues & Corinne Lengsfeld, 2019. "Development of a Computational System to Improve Wind Farm Layout, Part I: Model Validation and Near Wake Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Gao, Zhiteng & Li, Ye & Wang, Tongguang & Shen, Wenzhong & Zheng, Xiaobo & Pröbsting, Stefan & Li, Deshun & Li, Rennian, 2021. "Modelling the nacelle wake of a horizontal-axis wind turbine under different yaw conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 263-275.
    9. Zhu, Xiaocheng & Sun, Chong & Ouyang, Hua & Du, Zhaohui, 2022. "Numerical investigation of the effect of towers and nacelles on the near wake of a horizontal-axis wind turbine model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    10. Li, Qing'an & Murata, Junsuke & Endo, Masayuki & Maeda, Takao & Kamada, Yasunari, 2016. "Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of turbulent inflow on a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (part II: Wake characteristics)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1304-1315.
    11. Meng, Hang & Lien, Fue-Sang & Li, Li, 2018. "Elastic actuator line modelling for wake-induced fatigue analysis of horizontal axis wind turbine blade," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 423-437.
    12. Yuan Li & Zengjin Xu & Zuoxia Xing & Bowen Zhou & Haoqian Cui & Bowen Liu & Bo Hu, 2020. "A Modified Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes-Based Wind Turbine Wake Model Considering Correction Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Sang Lee & Peter Vorobieff & Svetlana Poroseva, 2018. "Interaction of Wind Turbine Wakes under Various Atmospheric Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Wim Munters & Johan Meyers, 2018. "Dynamic Strategies for Yaw and Induction Control of Wind Farms Based on Large-Eddy Simulation and Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-32, January.
    15. Qian, Yaoru & Wang, Tongguang & Yuan, Yiping & Zhang, Yuquan, 2020. "Comparative study on wind turbine wakes using a modified partially-averaged Navier-Stokes method and large eddy simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    16. Micallef, Daniel & Rezaeiha, Abdolrahim, 2021. "Floating offshore wind turbine aerodynamics: Trends and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    17. Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F., 2024. "A review of physical and numerical modeling techniques for horizontal-axis wind turbine wakes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Stevens, Richard J.A.M. & Martínez-Tossas, Luis A. & Meneveau, Charles, 2018. "Comparison of wind farm large eddy simulations using actuator disk and actuator line models with wind tunnel experiments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 470-478.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1418-:d:150120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.