IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i4p749-d138083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring Strategy through Multiway PCA and Multivariate Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Francesc Pozo

    (Control, Modeling, Identification and Applications (CoDAlab), Department of Mathematics, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est (EEBE), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Campus Diagonal-Besòs (CDB), Eduard Maristany, 16, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Yolanda Vidal

    (Control, Modeling, Identification and Applications (CoDAlab), Department of Mathematics, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est (EEBE), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Campus Diagonal-Besòs (CDB), Eduard Maristany, 16, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Óscar Salgado

    (Mechanical Engineering, IK4-Ikerlan, J.M. Arizmendiarrieta 2, 20500 Arrasate (Gipuzkoa), Spain)

Abstract

This article states a condition monitoring strategy for wind turbines using a statistical data-driven modeling approach by means of supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) data. Initially, a baseline data-based model is obtained from the healthy wind turbine by means of multiway principal component analysis (MPCA). Then, when the wind turbine is monitorized, new data is acquired and projected into the baseline MPCA model space. The acquired SCADA data are treated as a random process given the random nature of the turbulent wind. The objective is to decide if the multivariate distribution that is obtained from the wind turbine to be analyzed (healthy or not) is related to the baseline one. To achieve this goal, a test for the equality of population means is performed. Finally, the results of the test can determine that the hypothesis is rejected (and the wind turbine is faulty) or that there is no evidence to suggest that the two means are different, so the wind turbine can be considered as healthy. The methodology is evaluated on a wind turbine fault detection benchmark that uses a 5 MW high-fidelity wind turbine model and a set of eight realistic fault scenarios. It is noteworthy that the results, for the presented methodology, show that for a wide range of significance, α ∈ [ 1 % , 13 % ] , the percentage of correct decisions is kept at 100%; thus it is a promising tool for real-time wind turbine condition monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesc Pozo & Yolanda Vidal & Óscar Salgado, 2018. "Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring Strategy through Multiway PCA and Multivariate Inference," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:749-:d:138083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/4/749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/4/749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesc Pozo & Yolanda Vidal & Josep M. Serrahima, 2016. "On Real-Time Fault Detection in Wind Turbines: Sensor Selection Algorithm and Detection Time Reduction Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Vitor V. Lopes & Teresa Scholz & Frank Raischel & Pedro G. Lind, 2014. "Principal wind turbines for a conditional portfolio approach to wind farms," Papers 1404.0375, arXiv.org.
    3. Pedro G. Lind & Luis Vera-Tudela & Matthias Wächter & Martin Kühn & Joachim Peinke, 2017. "Normal Behaviour Models for Wind Turbine Vibrations: Comparison of Neural Networks and a Stochastic Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Pierre Tchakoua & René Wamkeue & Mohand Ouhrouche & Fouad Slaoui-Hasnaoui & Tommy Andy Tameghe & Gabriel Ekemb, 2014. "Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: State-of-the-Art Review, New Trends, and Future Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-36, April.
    5. Yolanda Vidal & Christian Tutivén & José Rodellar & Leonardo Acho, 2015. "Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control of Wind Turbines via a Discrete Time Controller with a Disturbance Compensator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Sun, Peng & Li, Jian & Wang, Caisheng & Lei, Xiao, 2016. "A generalized model for wind turbine anomaly identification based on SCADA data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 550-567.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yolanda Vidal & Francesc Pozo & Christian Tutivén, 2018. "Wind Turbine Multi-Fault Detection and Classification Based on SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. José Ramón del Álamo Salgado & Mario J. Durán Martínez & Francisco J. Muñoz Gutiérrez & Jorge Alarcon, 2021. "Analysis of the Gearbox Oil Maintenance Procedures in Wind Energy II," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Matheus Pereira Libório & Oseias da Silva Martinuci & Alexei Manso Correa Machado & Renata de Mello Lyrio & Patrícia Bernardes, 2022. "Time–Space Analysis of Multidimensional Phenomena: A Composite Indicator of Social Exclusion Through k-Means," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 569-591, January.
    4. Dao, Phong B. & Barszcz, Tomasz & Staszewski, Wieslaw J., 2024. "Anomaly detection of wind turbines based on stationarity analysis of SCADA data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    5. Phong B. Dao, 2023. "On Cointegration Analysis for Condition Monitoring and Fault Detection of Wind Turbines Using SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Jersson X Leon-Medina & Leydi J Cardenas-Flechas & Diego A Tibaduiza, 2019. "A data-driven methodology for the classification of different liquids in artificial taste recognition applications with a pulse voltammetric electronic tongue," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(10), pages 15501477198, October.
    7. K. Ramakrishna Kini & Fouzi Harrou & Muddu Madakyaru & Ying Sun, 2023. "Enhancing Wind Turbine Performance: Statistical Detection of Sensor Faults Based on Improved Dynamic Independent Component Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Cristian Velandia-Cardenas & Yolanda Vidal & Francesc Pozo, 2021. "Wind Turbine Fault Detection Using Highly Imbalanced Real SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    9. Peng Guo & Jian Fu & XiYun Yang, 2018. "Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Wind Turbines Gearbox Bearing Temperature Based on Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test and Convolutional Neural Network Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Estefania Artigao & Sofia Koukoura & Andrés Honrubia-Escribano & James Carroll & Alasdair McDonald & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro, 2018. "Current Signature and Vibration Analyses to Diagnose an In-Service Wind Turbine Drive Train," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Panagiotis Korkos & Jaakko Kleemola & Matti Linjama & Arto Lehtovaara, 2022. "Representation Learning for Detecting the Faults in a Wind Turbine Hydraulic Pitch System Using Deep Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Peyman Mazidi & Mian Du & Lina Bertling Tjernberg & Miguel A Sanz Bobi, 2017. "A health condition model for wind turbine monitoring through neural networks and proportional hazard models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 481-494, October.
    3. Jasiński, Tomasz, 2020. "Use of new variables based on air temperature for forecasting day-ahead spot electricity prices using deep neural networks: A new approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Md Liton Hossain & Ahmed Abu-Siada & S. M. Muyeen, 2018. "Methods for Advanced Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring and Early Diagnosis: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Habibi, Hamed & Howard, Ian & Simani, Silvio, 2019. "Reliability improvement of wind turbine power generation using model-based fault detection and fault tolerant control: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 877-896.
    6. Sabarathinam Srinivasan & Suresh Kumarasamy & Zacharias E. Andreadakis & Pedro G. Lind, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Models of Power Grids Driven by Renewable Energy Sources: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-56, July.
    7. Gisela Pujol-Vazquez & Leonardo Acho & José Gibergans-Báguena, 2020. "Fault Detection Algorithm for Wind Turbines’ Pitch Actuator Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Cheng Xiao & Zuojun Liu & Tieling Zhang & Lei Zhang, 2019. "On Fault Prediction for Wind Turbine Pitch System Using Radar Chart and Support Vector Machine Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Angel Gil & Miguel A. Sanz-Bobi & Miguel A. Rodríguez-López, 2018. "Behavior Anomaly Indicators Based on Reference Patterns—Application to the Gearbox and Electrical Generator of a Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Estefania Artigao & Sofia Koukoura & Andrés Honrubia-Escribano & James Carroll & Alasdair McDonald & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro, 2018. "Current Signature and Vibration Analyses to Diagnose an In-Service Wind Turbine Drive Train," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Chen, Xuejun & Yang, Yongming & Cui, Zhixin & Shen, Jun, 2019. "Vibration fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on variational mode decomposition and energy entropy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1100-1109.
    12. Camila Correa-Jullian & Sergio Cofre-Martel & Gabriel San Martin & Enrique Lopez Droguett & Gustavo de Novaes Pires Leite & Alexandre Costa, 2022. "Exploring Quantum Machine Learning and Feature Reduction Techniques for Wind Turbine Pitch Fault Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    13. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Bon-Yong Koo & Dae-Yi Jung, 2019. "A Comparative Study on Primary Bearing Rating Life of a 5-MW Two-Blade Wind Turbine System Based on Two Different Control Domains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Fan Zhang & Juchuan Dai & Deshun Liu & Linxing Li & Xin Long, 2019. "Investigation of the Pitch Load of Large-Scale Wind Turbines Using Field SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Nejra Beganovic & Jackson G. Njiri & Dirk Söffker, 2018. "Reduction of Structural Loads in Wind Turbines Based on an Adapted Control Strategy Concerning Online Fatigue Damage Evaluation Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Brooks, Sam & Mahmood, Minhal & Roy, Rajkumar & Manolesos, Marinos & Salonitis, Konstantinos, 2023. "Self-reconfiguration simulations of turbines to reduce uneven farm degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1301-1314.
    18. Moynihan, Bridget & Moaveni, Babak & Liberatore, Sauro & Hines, Eric, 2022. "Estimation of blade forces in wind turbines using blade root strain measurements with OpenFAST verification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 662-676.
    19. Pu Shi & Wenxian Yang & Meiping Sheng & Minqing Wang, 2017. "An Enhanced Empirical Wavelet Transform for Features Extraction from Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring Signals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    20. Odofin, Sarah & Bentley, Edward & Aikhuele, Daniel, 2018. "Robust fault estimation for wind turbine energy via hybrid systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 289-299.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:749-:d:138083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.