IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v9y2024i9p108-d1480911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dataset on the Validation and Standardization of the Questionnaire for the Self-Assessment of Service-Learning Experiences in Higher Education (QaSLu)

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Sánchez-Cabrero

    (Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Elena López-de-Arana Prado

    (Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Pilar Aramburuzabala

    (Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Rosario Cerrillo

    (Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This dataset shows the original validation and standardization of the Questionnaire for the Self-Assessment of Service-Learning Experiences in Higher Education (QaSLu). The QaSLu is the first instrument to measure university service-learning (USL), validated following a strict qualitative and quantitative process by a sample of experts in USL and generating rating scales for different profiles of professors. The Delphi method was used for the qualitative validation by 16 academic experts, who evaluated the relevance and clarity of the items. After two consultation rounds, 45 items were qualitatively validated, generating the QaSLu-45. Then, 118 instructors from 43 universities took part as the sample in the quantitative validation procedure. Quantitative validation was carried out through goodness-of-fit measures using confirmatory factor analysis and the final configuration optimized using one-factor robust exploratory factor analysis, determining the most optimal version of the questionnaire under the law of parsimony, the QaSLu-27, with only 27 items and better psychometric properties. Finally, rating scales were calculated to compare different profiles of USL professors. These findings offer a valid, strong, and trustworthy instrument. The QaSLu-27 may be helpful for the design of USL experiences, in addition to facilitating the assessment of such programs to enhance teaching and learning processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Sánchez-Cabrero & Elena López-de-Arana Prado & Pilar Aramburuzabala & Rosario Cerrillo, 2024. "Dataset on the Validation and Standardization of the Questionnaire for the Self-Assessment of Service-Learning Experiences in Higher Education (QaSLu)," Data, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:9:y:2024:i:9:p:108-:d:1480911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/9/9/108/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/9/9/108/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rowe, Gene & Wright, George, 1999. "The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 353-375, October.
    2. Newman, Frederick L. & Newman, Frederick L., 1980. "Global scales : Strengths, uses and problems of global scales as an evaluation instrument," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 257-268, January.
    3. Geist, Monica R., 2010. "Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 147-154, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alyami, Saleh. H. & Rezgui, Yacine & Kwan, Alan, 2013. "Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 43-54.
    2. Roßmann, Bernhard & Canzaniello, Angelo & von der Gracht, Heiko & Hartmann, Evi, 2018. "The future and social impact of Big Data Analytics in Supply Chain Management: Results from a Delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 135-149.
    3. Thi Yen Pham & Gi-Tae Yeo, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis Selecting the Transport Routes of Electronics Components from China to Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Mohammed, Sayeed & Desha, Cheryl & Goonetilleke, Ashantha, 2023. "Investigating the potential of low-carbon pathways for hydrocarbon-dependent rentier states: Sociotechnical transition in Qatar," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Pätäri, Satu & Tuppura, Anni & Toppinen, Anne & Korhonen, Jaana, 2016. "Global sustainability megaforces in shaping the future of the European pulp and paper industry towards a bioeconomy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 38-46.
    6. Tobias Meyer & Heiko A. von der Gracht & Evi Hartmann, 2022. "Technology foresight for sustainable road freight transportation: Insights from a global real‐time Delphi study," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), March.
    7. Belton, Ian & MacDonald, Alice & Wright, George & Hamlin, Iain, 2019. "Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 72-82.
    8. Förster, Bernadette & von der Gracht, Heiko, 2014. "Assessing Delphi panel composition for strategic foresight — A comparison of panels based on company-internal and external participants," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 215-229.
    9. Kopyto, Matthias & Lechler, Sabrina & von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Hartmann, Evi, 2020. "Potentials of blockchain technology in supply chain management: Long-term judgments of an international expert panel," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Prianto Budi Saptono & Gustofan Mahmud & Intan Pratiwi & Dwi Purwanto & Ismail Khozen & Muhamad Akbar Aditama & Siti Khodijah & Maria Eurelia Wayan & Rina Yuliastuty Asmara & Ferry Jie, 2023. "Development of Climate-Related Disclosure Indicators for Application in Indonesia: A Delphi Method Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Lin, Tun & De Guzman, Franklin, 2007. "Tourism for pro-poor and sustainable growth: economic analysis of tourism projects," MPRA Paper 24994, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Di Zio, Simone & Bolzan, Mario & Marozzi, Marco, 2021. "Classification of Delphi outputs through robust ranking and fuzzy clustering for Delphi-based scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Litsiou, Konstantia & Polychronakis, Yiannis & Karami, Azhdar & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2022. "Relative performance of judgmental methods for forecasting the success of megaprojects," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1185-1196.
    14. Ngoy Kabemba S. & Chisumbe Sampa & Petere Gaida & Mwiya Balimu & Mwanaumo Erastus, 2023. "Factors Influencing Professional Indemnity Insurance Use in Construction Risk Management," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 199-220, January.
    15. Frederico Fernandes Ávila & Regina C. Alvalá & Rodolfo M. Mendes & Diogo J. Amore, 2024. "Socio-geoenvironmental vulnerability index (SGeoVI) derived from hybrid modeling related to populations at-risk to landslides," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(9), pages 8121-8151, July.
    16. van Asselt, E.D. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & van Asseldonk, M.A.P.M. & Sterrenburg, P. & Mengelers, M.J.B. & van der Fels-Klerx, H.J., 2011. "Approach for a pro-active emerging risk system on biofuel by-products in feed," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 421-429, June.
    17. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Daniel Reißmann & Daniela Thrän & Alberto Bezama, 2018. "Key Development Factors of Hydrothermal Processes in Germany by 2030: A Fuzzy Logic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Myeonggil Choi & Changhan Lee, 2015. "Information Security Management as a Bridge in Cloud Systems from Private to Public Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Christoph Markmann & Alexander Spickermann & Heiko A. von der Gracht & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Improving the question formulation in Delphi‐like surveys: Analysis of the effects of abstract language and amount of information on response behavior," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:9:y:2024:i:9:p:108-:d:1480911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.