IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v4y2019i2p79-d234206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualization of Myocardial Strain Pattern Uniqueness with Respect to Activation Time and Contractility: A Computational Study

Author

Listed:
  • Borut Kirn

    (Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Speckle tracking echography is used to measure myocardial strain patterns in order to assess the state of myocardial tissue. Because electro-mechanical coupling in myocardial tissue is complex and nonlinear, and because of the measurement errors the uniqueness of strain patterns is questionable. In this study, the uniqueness of strain patterns was visualized in order to revel characteristics that may improve their interpretation. A computational model of sarcomere mechanics was used to generate a database of 1681 strain patterns, each simulated with a different set of sarcomere parameters: time of activation (TA) and contractility (Con). TA and Con ranged from −100 ms to 100 ms and 2% to 202% in 41 steps respectively, thus forming a two-dimensional 41 × 41 parameter space. Uniqueness of the strain pattern was assessed by using a cohort of similar strain patterns defined by a measurement error. The cohort members were then visualized in the parameter space. Each cohort formed one connected component (or blob) in the parameter space; however, large differences in the shape, size, and eccentricity of the blobs were found for different regions in the parameter space. The blobs were elongated along the TA direction (±50 ms) when contractility was low, and along the Con direction (±50%) when contractility was high. The uniqueness of the strain patterns can be assessed and visualized in the parameter space. The strain patterns in the studied database are not degenerated because a cohort of similar strain patterns forms only one connected blob in the parameter space. However, the elongation of the blobs means that estimations of TA when contractility is low and of Con when contractility is high have high uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Borut Kirn, 2019. "Visualization of Myocardial Strain Pattern Uniqueness with Respect to Activation Time and Contractility: A Computational Study," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-7, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:4:y:2019:i:2:p:79-:d:234206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/4/2/79/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/4/2/79/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan N Gutenkunst & Joshua J Waterfall & Fergal P Casey & Kevin S Brown & Christopher R Myers & James P Sethna, 2007. "Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-8, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongwei Shao & Tao Peng & Zhiwei Ji & Jing Su & Xiaobo Zhou, 2013. "Systematically Studying Kinase Inhibitor Induced Signaling Network Signatures by Integrating Both Therapeutic and Side Effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Gabriele Lillacci & Mustafa Khammash, 2010. "Parameter Estimation and Model Selection in Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Andrew White & Malachi Tolman & Howard D Thames & Hubert Rodney Withers & Kathy A Mason & Mark K Transtrum, 2016. "The Limitations of Model-Based Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation in Sloppy Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Elba Raimúndez & Simone Keller & Gwen Zwingenberger & Karolin Ebert & Sabine Hug & Fabian J Theis & Dieter Maier & Birgit Luber & Jan Hasenauer, 2020. "Model-based analysis of response and resistance factors of cetuximab treatment in gastric cancer cell lines," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Joseph D Taylor & Samuel Winnall & Alain Nogaret, 2020. "Estimation of neuron parameters from imperfect observations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Xinxian Shao & Andrew Mugler & Justin Kim & Ha Jun Jeong & Bruce R Levin & Ilya Nemenman, 2017. "Growth of bacteria in 3-d colonies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Agus Hartoyo & Peter J Cadusch & David T J Liley & Damien G Hicks, 2019. "Parameter estimation and identifiability in a neural population model for electro-cortical activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Christian A Tiemann & Joep Vanlier & Maaike H Oosterveer & Albert K Groen & Peter A J Hilbers & Natal A W van Riel, 2013. "Parameter Trajectory Analysis to Identify Treatment Effects of Pharmacological Interventions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Zachary R Fox & Brian Munsky, 2019. "The finite state projection based Fisher information matrix approach to estimate information and optimize single-cell experiments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Yuncong Geng & Thu Vu Phuc Nguyen & Ehsan Homaee & Ido Golding, 2024. "Using bacterial population dynamics to count phages and their lysogens," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Claudia Schillings & Mikael Sunnåker & Jörg Stelling & Christoph Schwab, 2015. "Efficient Characterization of Parametric Uncertainty of Complex (Bio)chemical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Giorgos Minas & David A Rand, 2017. "Long-time analytic approximation of large stochastic oscillators: Simulation, analysis and inference," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Marc Hafner & Heinz Koeppl & Martin Hasler & Andreas Wagner, 2009. "‘Glocal’ Robustness Analysis and Model Discrimination for Circadian Oscillators," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-10, October.
    14. Joshua Russell-Buckland & Christopher P Barnes & Ilias Tachtsidis, 2019. "A Bayesian framework for the analysis of systems biology models of the brain," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, April.
    15. Andrew J K Conlan & Ellen Brooks Pollock & Trevelyan J McKinley & Andrew P Mitchell & Gareth J Jones & Martin Vordermeier & James L N Wood, 2015. "Potential Benefits of Cattle Vaccination as a Supplementary Control for Bovine Tuberculosis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-27, February.
    16. Rodrigo P. Rocha & Loren Koçillari & Samir Suweis & Michele Filippo De Grazia & Michel Thiebaut Schotten & Marco Zorzi & Maurizio Corbetta, 2022. "Recovery of neural dynamics criticality in personalized whole-brain models of stroke," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Farzaneh Khajouei & Saurabh Sinha, 2018. "An information theoretic treatment of sequence-to-expression modeling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Sang O K Song & Justin Hogg & Zhi-Yong Peng & Robert Parker & John A Kellum & Gilles Clermont, 2012. "Ensemble Models of Neutrophil Trafficking in Severe Sepsis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Port, Alexander & Bryan, Karin R. & Pilditch, Conrad A. & Hamilton, David P. & Bischof, Kai, 2015. "Algebraic equilibrium solution of tissue nitrogen quota in algae and the discrepancy between calibrated parameters and physiological properties," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 281-291.
    20. Van Kinh Nguyen & Frank Klawonn & Rafael Mikolajczyk & Esteban A Hernandez-Vargas, 2016. "Analysis of Practical Identifiability of a Viral Infection Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:4:y:2019:i:2:p:79-:d:234206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.