IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v4y2018i1p6-d193848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Twitter for Public Health Surveillance from Monitoring and Prediction to Public Response

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie E. Jordan

    (School of Chemical, Materials, and Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

  • Sierra E. Hovet

    (School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

  • Isaac Chun-Hai Fung

    (Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

  • Hai Liang

    (School of Journalism and Communication, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • King-Wa Fu

    (Journalism and Media Studies Centre, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Zion Tsz Ho Tse

    (School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

Abstract

Twitter is a social media platform where over 500 million people worldwide publish their ideas and discuss diverse topics, including their health conditions and public health events. Twitter has proved to be an important source of health-related information on the Internet, given the amount of information that is shared by both citizens and official sources. Twitter provides researchers with a real-time source of public health information on a global scale, and can be very important in public health research. Classifying Twitter data into topics or categories is helpful to better understand how users react and communicate. A literature review is presented on the use of mining Twitter data or similar short-text datasets for public health applications. Each method is analyzed for ways to use Twitter data in public health surveillance. Papers in which Twitter content was classified according to users or tweets for better surveillance of public health were selected for review. Only papers published between 2010–2017 were considered. The reviewed publications are distinguished by the methods that were used to categorize the Twitter content in different ways. While comparing studies is difficult due to the number of different methods that have been used for applying Twitter and interpreting data, this state-of-the-art review demonstrates the vast potential of utilizing Twitter for public health surveillance purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie E. Jordan & Sierra E. Hovet & Isaac Chun-Hai Fung & Hai Liang & King-Wa Fu & Zion Tsz Ho Tse, 2018. "Using Twitter for Public Health Surveillance from Monitoring and Prediction to Public Response," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:6-:d:193848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/4/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/4/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary King & Patrick Lam & Margaret E. Roberts, 2017. "Computer‐Assisted Keyword and Document Set Discovery from Unstructured Text," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(4), pages 971-988, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diane Ezeh Aruah & Yvonne Henshaw & Kim Walsh-Childers, 2023. "Tweets That Matter: Exploring the Solutions to Maternal Mortality in the United States Discussed by Advocacy Organizations on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Cano-Marin, Enrique & Mora-Cantallops, Marçal & Sanchez-Alonso, Salvador, 2023. "The power of big data analytics over fake news: A scientometric review of Twitter as a predictive system in healthcare," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. María José Aramburu & Rafael Berlanga & Indira Lanza, 2020. "Social Media Multidimensional Analysis for Intelligent Health Surveillance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Javier Jiménez-Cabas & Lizeth Torres & Jorge de J. Lozoya-Santos, 2023. "Twitter Data Mining for the Diagnosis of Leaks in Drinking Water Distribution Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandra Wankmüller, 2023. "A comparison of approaches for imbalanced classification problems in the context of retrieving relevant documents for an analysis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 91-163, April.
    2. McCannon, Bryan & Zhou, Yang & Hall, Joshua, 2021. "Measuring a Contract’s Breadth: A Text Analysis," Working Papers 11013, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    3. Fraccaroli, Nicolò & Giovannini, Alessandro & Jamet, Jean-François & Persson, Eric, 2022. "Ideology and monetary policy. The role of political parties’ stances in the European Central Bank’s parliamentary hearings," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Erkan Işığıçok & Sadullah Çelik & Dilek Özdemir Yılmaz, 2023. "Analysis of Skills and Qualifications Required in Data Scientist Job Postings Based on the Pareto Analysis Perspective Using Text Mining," EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(39), pages 10-25, December.
    5. Yu-Ru Lin & Wen-Ting Chung, 2020. "The dynamics of Twitter users’ gun narratives across major mass shooting events," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Lisa Oswald, 2024. "More than news! Mapping the deliberative potential of a political online ecosystem with digital trace data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Natalie Kyung Won Kim & Sera Choi & Taejin Jung & Sohee Park, 2023. "How does demand uncertainty from climate change exposure affect the firms' cost structures? Examining the real effects of climate change on the firms' operational decisions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2969-2989, November.
    8. Callan Windsor & Max Zang, 2023. "Firms' Price-setting Behaviour: Insights from Earnings Calls," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2023-06, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    9. Colella, Sara & Dufourt, Frédéric & Hildebrand, Vincent A. & Vivès, Rémi, 2023. "Mental health effects of COVID-19 lockdowns: A Twitter-based analysis," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. Alexandra Sadler & Nicola Ranger & Sam Fankhauser & Fulvia Marotta & Brian O’Callaghan, 2024. "The impact of COVID-19 fiscal spending on climate change adaptation and resilience," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 270-281, March.
    11. Annie Collins & Rohan Alexander, 2022. "Reproducibility of COVID-19 pre-prints," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4655-4673, August.
    12. Fraccaroli, Nicolò & Giovannini, Alessandro & Jamet, Jean-Francois & Persson, Eric, 2022. "Ideology and monetary policy: the role of political parties’ stances in the ECB’s parliamentary hearings," Working Paper Series 2655, European Central Bank.
    13. Völker, Richard & Hirschauer, Norbert & Lind, Fabienne & Gruener, Sven, 2024. "Search term validation in agricultural economics: conceptual background and application," OSF Preprints v68r7, Center for Open Science.
    14. Crocker H. Liu & Adam Nowak & Patrick S. Smith, 2018. "Does the Asset Pricing Premium Reflect Asymmetric or Incomplete Information?," Working Papers 18-06, Department of Economics, West Virginia University.
    15. Zhang, Si Ying, 2022. "Are investors sensitive to climate-related transition and physical risks? Evidence from global stock markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Dooruj Rambaccussing & Andrzej Kwiatkowski, 2024. "The nexus between national and regional reporting of economic news: Evidence from the United Kingdom and Scotland," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 371-393, April.
    17. Gostlow, Glen, 2020. "The materiality and measurement of physical climate risk: evidence from Form 8-K," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107045, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:6-:d:193848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.