IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v7y2020i1d10.1057_s41599-020-00533-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dynamics of Twitter users’ gun narratives across major mass shooting events

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Ru Lin

    (University of Pittsburgh)

  • Wen-Ting Chung

    (University of Pittsburgh)

Abstract

This study reveals a shift of gun-related narratives created by two ideological groups during three high-profile mass shootings in the United States across the years from 2016 to 2018. It utilizes large-scale, longitudinal social media traces from over 155,000 ideology-identifiable Twitter users. The study design leveraged both the linguistic dictionary approach as well as thematic coding inspired by Narrative Policy Framework, which allows for statistical and qualitative comparison. We found several distinctive narrative characteristics between the two ideology groups in response to the shooting events—two groups differed by how they incorporated linguistic and narrative features in their tweets in terms of policy stance, attribution (how one believed to be the problem, the cause or blame, and the solution), the rhetoric employed, and emotion throughout the incidents. The findings suggest how shooting events may penetrate the public discursive processes that had been previously dominated by existing ideological references and may facilitate discussions beyond ideological identities. Overall, in the wake of mass shooting events, the tweets adhering to the majority policy stance within a camp declined, whereas the proportion of mixed or flipped stance tweets increased. Meanwhile, more tweets were observed to express causal reasoning of a held policy stance, and a different pattern in the use of rhetoric schemes, such as the decline of provocative ridicule, emerged. The shifting patterns in users’ narratives coincide with the two groups distinctive emotional response revealed in text. These findings offer insights into the opportunity to reconcile conflicts and the potential for creating civic technologies to improve the interpretability of linguistic and narrative signals and to support diverse narratives and framing.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Ru Lin & Wen-Ting Chung, 2020. "The dynamics of Twitter users’ gun narratives across major mass shooting events," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:7:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-00533-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-00533-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-020-00533-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-020-00533-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papachristos, A.V. & Wildeman, C., 2014. "Network exposure and homicide victimization in an African American community," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(1), pages 143-150.
    2. Gary King & Patrick Lam & Margaret E. Roberts, 2017. "Computer‐Assisted Keyword and Document Set Discovery from Unstructured Text," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(4), pages 971-988, October.
    3. Yu‐Ru Lin & Drew Margolin & Xidao Wen, 2017. "Tracking and Analyzing Individual Distress Following Terrorist Attacks Using Social Media Streams," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(8), pages 1580-1605, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McCannon, Bryan & Zhou, Yang & Hall, Joshua, 2021. "Measuring a Contract’s Breadth: A Text Analysis," Working Papers 11013, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    2. Fraccaroli, Nicolò & Giovannini, Alessandro & Jamet, Jean-François & Persson, Eric, 2022. "Ideology and monetary policy. The role of political parties’ stances in the European Central Bank’s parliamentary hearings," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Gian Maria Campedelli, 2022. "Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Homicide Clearance in the United States," Papers 2203.04768, arXiv.org.
    4. Erkan Işığıçok & Sadullah Çelik & Dilek Özdemir Yılmaz, 2023. "Analysis of Skills and Qualifications Required in Data Scientist Job Postings Based on the Pareto Analysis Perspective Using Text Mining," EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(39), pages 10-25, December.
    5. Smith, Thomas Bryan, 2021. "Gang crackdowns and offender centrality in a countywide co-offending network: A networked evaluation of Operation Triple Beam," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Matt Baucum & Heather Rosoff & Richard John & William Burns & Paul Slovic, 2018. "Modeling public responses to soft-target transportation terror," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 239-249, June.
    7. Lisa Oswald, 2024. "More than news! Mapping the deliberative potential of a political online ecosystem with digital trace data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Callan Windsor & Max Zang, 2023. "Firms' Price-setting Behaviour: Insights from Earnings Calls," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2023-06, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    9. Colella, Sara & Dufourt, Frédéric & Hildebrand, Vincent A. & Vivès, Rémi, 2023. "Mental health effects of COVID-19 lockdowns: A Twitter-based analysis," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. Kelly V Ruggles & Sonali Rajan, 2014. "Gun Possession among American Youth: A Discovery-Based Approach to Understand Gun Violence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-12, November.
    11. Alexandra Sadler & Nicola Ranger & Sam Fankhauser & Fulvia Marotta & Brian O’Callaghan, 2024. "The impact of COVID-19 fiscal spending on climate change adaptation and resilience," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 270-281, March.
    12. Annie Collins & Rohan Alexander, 2022. "Reproducibility of COVID-19 pre-prints," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4655-4673, August.
    13. Papachristos, Andrew V. & Wildeman, Christopher & Roberto, Elizabeth, 2015. "Tragic, but not random: The social contagion of nonfatal gunshot injuries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 139-150.
    14. Piquero, Alex R., 2023. "“We study the past to understand the present; we understand the present to guide the future”: The time capsule of developmental and life-course criminology," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. O'Neill, Kathleen M. & Salazar, Michelle C. & Vega, Cecilio & Campbell, Anthony & Anderson, Elijah & Dodington, James, 2021. "“The cops didn't make it any better”: Perspectives on police and guns among survivors of gun violence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    16. Völker, Richard & Hirschauer, Norbert & Lind, Fabienne & Gruener, Sven, 2024. "Search term validation in agricultural economics: conceptual background and application," OSF Preprints v68r7, Center for Open Science.
    17. Zhang, Si Ying, 2022. "Are investors sensitive to climate-related transition and physical risks? Evidence from global stock markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. Edward R. Maguire & Cody W. Telep & Thomas Abt & Ericka Adams, 2024. "PROTOCOL: Street outreach conflict mediation programs for reducing violence," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    19. Dooruj Rambaccussing & Andrzej Kwiatkowski, 2024. "The nexus between national and regional reporting of economic news: Evidence from the United Kingdom and Scotland," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 371-393, April.
    20. Gostlow, Glen, 2020. "The materiality and measurement of physical climate risk: evidence from Form 8-K," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107045, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:7:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-00533-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.