IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v3y2018i2p12-d140350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between Simulation and Analytical Methods in Reliability Data Analysis: A Case Study on Face Drilling Rigs

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Hadi Hoseinie

    (Department of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran)

  • Hussan Al-Chalabi

    (Division of Operation & Maintenance Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden)

  • Behzad Ghodrati

    (Division of Operation & Maintenance Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden)

Abstract

Collecting the failure data and reliability analysis in an underground mining operation is challenging due to the harsh environment and high level of production pressure. Therefore, achieving an accurate, fast, and applicable analysis in a fleet of underground equipment is usually difficult and time consuming. This paper aims to discuss the main reliability analysis challenges in mining machinery by comparing three main approaches: two analytical methods (white-box and black-box modeling), and a simulation approach. For this purpose, the maintenance data from a fleet of face drilling rigs in a Swedish underground metal mine were extracted by the MAXIMO system over a period of two years and were applied for analysis. The investigations reveal that the performance of these approaches in ranking and the reliability of the studies of the machines is different. However, all mentioned methods provide similar outputs but, in general, the simulation estimates the reliability of the studied machines at a higher level. The simulation and white-box method sometimes provide exactly the same results, which are caused by their similar structure of analysis. On average, 9% of the data are missed in the white-box analysis due to a lack of sufficient data in some of the subsystems of the studies’ rigs.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Hadi Hoseinie & Hussan Al-Chalabi & Behzad Ghodrati, 2018. "Comparison between Simulation and Analytical Methods in Reliability Data Analysis: A Case Study on Face Drilling Rigs," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:12-:d:140350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/3/2/12/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/3/2/12/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louit, D.M. & Pascual, R. & Jardine, A.K.S., 2009. "A practical procedure for the selection of time-to-failure models based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1618-1628.
    2. Balbir S. Dhillon, 2008. "Mining Equipment Reliability, Maintainability, and Safety," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84800-288-3, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simone Fiori & Andrea Vitali, 2019. "Statistical Modeling of Trivariate Static Systems: Isotonic Models," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Yuriy Zaporozhets & Artem Ivanov & Yuriy Kondratenko, 2019. "Geometrical Platform of Big Database Computing for Modeling of Complex Physical Phenomena in Electric Current Treatment of Liquid Metals," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajkumar Bhimgonda Patil & Basavraj S Kothavale & Laxman Yadu Waghmode, 2019. "Selection of time-to-failure model for computerized numerical control turning center based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 105-117, April.
    2. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    3. Braglia, Marcello & Carmignani, Gionata & Frosolini, Marco & Zammori, Francesco, 2012. "Data classification and MTBF prediction with a multivariate analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 27-35.
    4. Boris V. Malozyomov & Nikita V. Martyushev & Nikita V. Babyr & Alexander V. Pogrebnoy & Egor A. Efremenkov & Denis V. Valuev & Aleksandr E. Boltrushevich, 2024. "Modelling of Reliability Indicators of a Mining Plant," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Barabadi, A. & Ayele, Y.Z., 2018. "Post-disaster infrastructure recovery: Prediction of recovery rate using historical data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 209-223.
    6. Hu, Wei & Yang, Zhaojun & Chen, Chuanhai & Wu, Yue & Xie, Qunya, 2021. "A Weibull-based recurrent regression model for repairable systems considering double effects of operation and maintenance: A case study of machine tools," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Hu, Wei & Westerlund, Per & Hilber, Patrik & Chen, Chuanhai & Yang, Zhaojun, 2022. "A general model, estimation, and procedure for modeling recurrent failure process of high-voltage circuit breakers considering multivariate impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Peng, Yizhen & Wang, Yu & Zi, YanYang & Tsui, Kwok-Leung & Zhang, Chuhua, 2017. "Dynamic reliability assessment and prediction for repairable systems with interval-censored data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 301-309.
    9. Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    10. Orlando Durán & Andrea Capaldo & Paulo Andrés Duran Acevedo, 2018. "Sustainable Overall Throughputability Effectiveness (S.O.T.E.) as a Metric for Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Ali Nouri Gharahasanlou & Mohammad Ataei & Reza Khalokakaie & Abbas Barabadi & Vahid Einian, 2017. "Risk based maintenance strategy: a quantitative approach based on time-to-failure model," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(3), pages 602-611, September.
    12. Stevan Djenadic & Dragan Ignjatovic & Milos Tanasijevic & Ugljesa Bugaric & Ivan Jankovic & Tomislav Subaranovic, 2019. "Development of the Availability Concept by Using Fuzzy Theory with AHP Correction, a Case Study: Bulldozers in the Open-Pit Lignite Mine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Juan Izquierdo & Adolfo Crespo Márquez & Jone Uribetxebarria & Asier Erguido, 2019. "Framework for Managing Maintenance of Wind Farms Based on a Clustering Approach and Dynamic Opportunistic Maintenance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Pavel V. Shishkin & Boris V. Malozyomov & Nikita V. Martyushev & Svetlana N. Sorokova & Egor A. Efremenkov & Denis V. Valuev & Mengxu Qi, 2024. "Development of a Mathematical Model of Operation Reliability of Mine Hoisting Plants," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    15. Kuznetsova, Elizaveta & Li, Yan-Fu & Ruiz, Carlos & Zio, Enrico & Ault, Graham & Bell, Keith, 2013. "Reinforcement learning for microgrid energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 133-146.
    16. Wu, Shaomin, 2021. "Two methods to approximate the superposition of imperfect failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    17. Mostafa Aliyari & Yonas Z Ayele & Abbas Barabadi & Enrique Lopez Droguett, 2019. "Risk analysis in low-voltage distribution systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 118-138, April.
    18. Rezgar Zaki & Abbas Barabadi & Javad Barabady & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou, 2022. "Observed and unobserved heterogeneity in failure data analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 194-207, February.
    19. Vanderschueren, Toon & Boute, Robert & Verdonck, Tim & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter, 2023. "Optimizing the preventive maintenance frequency with causal machine learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    20. Moghadam, Mehdi Akbari & Bagheri, Sajad & Salemi, Amir Hosein & Tavakoli, Mohammad Bagher, 2023. "Long-term maintenance planning of medium voltage overhead lines considering the uncertainties and reasons for interruption in a real distribution network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:12-:d:140350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.