IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v6y2015i1p158-172d50269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomass Resource Assessment and Existing Biomass Use in the Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu States of India

Author

Listed:
  • Karthikeyan Natarajan

    (School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, Joensuu 80101, Finland)

  • Petri Latva-Käyrä

    (Arbonaut Oy, Kaislakatu 2, Joensuu 80130, Finland)

  • Anas Zyadin

    (School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, Joensuu 80101, Finland)

  • Suresh Chauhan

    (The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), IHC Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003, India)

  • Harminder Singh

    (The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), IHC Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003, India)

  • Ari Pappinen

    (School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, Joensuu 80101, Finland)

  • Paavo Pelkonen

    (School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, Joensuu 80101, Finland)

Abstract

India is experiencing energy crisis and a widening gap between energy supply and demand. The country is, however, endowed with considerable, commercially and technically available renewable resources, from which surplus agro-biomass is of great importance and a relatively untapped resource. In the policy making process, knowledge of existing biomass use, degree of social reliance, and degree of biomass availability for energy production is unequivocal and pre-conditional. Field observations, documentation, and fill-in sheet tools were used to investigate the potential of biomass resources and the existing domestic, commercial, and industrial uses of biomass in selected Indian states. To do so, a team of field observers/supervisors visited three Indian states namely: Maharashtra (MH), Madhya Pradesh (MP), and Tamil Nadu (TN). Two districts from each state were selected to collect data regarding the use of biomass and the extent of biomass availability for energy production. In total, 471 farmers were interviewed, and approximately 75 farmers with various land holdings have been interviewed in each district. The existing uses of biomass have been documented in this survey study and the results show that the majority of biomass is used as fodder for domestic livestock followed by in-site ploughing, leaving trivial surplus quantities for other productive uses. Biomass for cooking appeared to be insignificant due to the availability and access to Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) cylinders in the surveyed districts. Opportunities exist to utilize roadside-dumped biomass, in-site burnt biomass, and a share of biomass used for ploughing. The GIS-based maps show that biomass availability varies considerably across the Taluks of the surveyed districts, and is highly dependent on a number of enviromental and socio-cultural factors. Developing competitive bioenergy market and enhancing and promoting access to more LPG fuel connections seem an appropriate socio-economic and environmental approach to reduce the use of biomass for indoor cooking and increasing the share of surplus biomass for energy production.

Suggested Citation

  • Karthikeyan Natarajan & Petri Latva-Käyrä & Anas Zyadin & Suresh Chauhan & Harminder Singh & Ari Pappinen & Paavo Pelkonen, 2015. "Biomass Resource Assessment and Existing Biomass Use in the Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu States of India," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:158-172:d:50269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/6/1/158/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/6/1/158/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo & Sofian, Saudah & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa & Saaeidi, Seyyed Alireza, 2015. "How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 341-350.
    2. Singh, Jasvinder & Gu, Sai, 2010. "Biomass conversion to energy in India--A critique," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 1367-1378, June.
    3. Bhattacharyya, Subhes C., 2006. "Energy access problem of the poor in India: Is rural electrification a remedy?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 3387-3397, December.
    4. Masera, Omar R. & Saatkamp, Barbara D. & Kammen, Daniel M., 2000. "From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 2083-2103, December.
    5. Pachauri, Shonali & Jiang, Leiwen, 2008. "The household energy transition in India and China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4022-4035, November.
    6. Kumar, Anil & Kumar, Nitin & Baredar, Prashant & Shukla, Ashish, 2015. "A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 530-539.
    7. Anas Zyadin & Karthikeyan Natarajan & Suresh Chauhan & Harminder Singh & Md. Kamrul Hassan & Ari Pappinen & Paavo Pelkonen, 2015. "Indian Farmers’ Perceptions and Willingness to Supply Surplus Biomass to an Envisioned Biomass-Based Power Plant," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Hiloidhari, Moonmoon & Das, Dhiman & Baruah, D.C., 2014. "Bioenergy potential from crop residue biomass in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 504-512.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Härri & Jarkko Levänen & Katariina Koistinen, 2020. "Marginalized Small-Scale Farmers as Actors in Just Circular-Economy Transitions: Exploring Opportunities to Circulate Crop Residue as Raw Material in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Natarajan, Karthikeyan & Latva-Käyrä, Petri & Zyadin, Anas & Pelkonen, Paavo, 2016. "New methodological approach for biomass resource assessment in India using GIS application and land use/land cover (LULC) maps," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 256-268.
    3. Zyadin, Anas & Natarajan, Karthikeyan & Latva-Käyrä, Petri & Igliński, Bartłomiej & Iglińska, Anna & Trishkin, Maxim & Pelkonen, Paavo & Pappinen, Ari, 2018. "Estimation of surplus biomass potential in southern and central Poland using GIS applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 204-215.
    4. Elena Fedorova & Kirsi Aaltonen & Eva Pongrácz, 2020. "Social Sustainability Dilemma: Escape or Communicate? Managing Social Risks Upstream of the Bioenergy Supply Chain," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, 2023. "A Novel Integrated q-Rung Fuzzy Framework for Biomass Location Selection with No Apriori Weight Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Ardit Sertolli & Zoltán Gabnai & Péter Lengyel & Attila Bai, 2022. "Biomass Potential and Utilization in Worldwide Research Trends—A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natarajan, Karthikeyan & Latva-Käyrä, Petri & Zyadin, Anas & Pelkonen, Paavo, 2016. "New methodological approach for biomass resource assessment in India using GIS application and land use/land cover (LULC) maps," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 256-268.
    2. Singh, Rhythm, 2018. "Energy sufficiency aspirations of India and the role of renewable resources: Scenarios for future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2783-2795.
    3. Stefan Bouzarovski & Saska Petrova & Sergio Tirado-Herrero, 2014. "From Fuel Poverty to Energy Vulnerability: The Importance of Services, Needs and Practices," SPRU Working Paper Series 2014-25, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    4. Mirza, Bilal & Kemp, Rene, 2009. "Why Rural Rich Remain Energy Poor," MERIT Working Papers 2009-024, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Gagandeep Kaur & Yadwinder Singh Brar & D.P. Kothari, 2017. "Potential of Livestock Generated Biomass: Untapped Energy Source in India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Hiloidhari, Moonmoon & Das, Dhiman & Baruah, D.C., 2014. "Bioenergy potential from crop residue biomass in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 504-512.
    7. Rahul Ranjan & Sudershan Singh, 2023. "Switching Towards LPG: Indian Household Perspectives," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 21(2), pages 417-435, June.
    8. Sunny Vaish & Gagandeep Kaur & Naveen Kumar Sharma & Nikhil Gakkhar, 2022. "Estimation for Potential of Agricultural Biomass Sources as Projections of Bio-Briquettes in Indian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Sansaniwal, S.K. & Rosen, M.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2017. "Global challenges in the sustainable development of biomass gasification: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 23-43.
    10. Al-Hamamre, Zayed & Saidan, Motasem & Hararah, Muhanned & Rawajfeh, Khaled & Alkhasawneh, Hussam E. & Al-Shannag, Mohammad, 2017. "Wastes and biomass materials as sustainable-renewable energy resources for Jordan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 295-314.
    11. MacCarty, Nordica A. & Bryden, Kenneth Mark, 2016. "An integrated systems model for energy services in rural developing communities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 536-557.
    12. He, Xiaoping & Reiner, David, 2016. "Electricity demand and basic needs: Empirical evidence from China's households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 212-221.
    13. Ahmed Moustapha Mfokeu & Elie Virgile Chrysostome & Jean-Pierre Gueyie & Olivier Ebenezer Mun Ngapna, 2023. "Consumer Motivation behind the Use of Ecological Charcoal in Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Behera, Bhagirath & Ali, Akhter, 2016. "Patterns and determinants of household use of fuels for cooking: Empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P1), pages 93-104.
    15. Jeuland, Marc & Fetter, T. Robert & Li, Yating & Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. & Usmani, Faraz & Bluffstone, Randall A. & Chávez, Carlos & Girardeau, Hannah & Hassen, Sied & Jagger, Pamela & Jaime, Mónica , 2021. "Is energy the golden thread? A systematic review of the impacts of modern and traditional energy use in low- and middle-income countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    16. Malla, Sunil & Timilsina, Govinda R, 2014. "Household cooking fuel choice and adoption of improved cookstoves in developing countries : a review," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6903, The World Bank.
    17. Sallahuddin Hassan, 2018. "Long Run Energy Demand and Its Determinants: A Panel Cointegration Analysis of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations-5," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 270-279.
    18. Ekholm, Tommi & Krey, Volker & Pachauri, Shonali & Riahi, Keywan, 2010. "Determinants of household energy consumption in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5696-5707, October.
    19. Cheng, Chao-yo & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2014. "Fuel stacking in India: Changes in the cooking and lighting mix, 1987–2010," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 306-317.
    20. Bhattacharyya, Subhes C., 2010. "Shaping a sustainable energy future for India: Management challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4173-4185, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:158-172:d:50269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.