IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v15y2024i4p43-d1513513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Air Quality Legislation in Australia and Canada—A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Shilpi Tewari

    (School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

  • Nidhi Pandey

    (Independent Researcher, Edmonton, AB T6E 4S4, Canada)

  • Jierui Dong

    (School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

Abstract

Air pollution is a pervasive global issue affecting human health, ecosystems, and the environment. This paper reviews the evolution and implementation of air quality legislation in Australia and Canada, providing a comparative analysis of their approaches to managing air pollution. Both countries have established robust legal frameworks to address air quality issues, involving governmental policies, regulatory mechanisms, and collaborative efforts among stakeholders. Australia began its air quality regulation at the state level in the 1950s, evolving into a national framework with the National Environment Protection Measure for Ambient Air Quality in 1998. In contrast, Canada centralized its efforts with the Clean Air Act in 1971, complemented by the National Air Pollution Surveillance program. Key findings reveal that, while both nations have achieved significant improvements in air quality, challenges remain in addressing the broader impacts of air pollution, such as climate change and health-related economic burdens. Australia’s air quality standards are generally more stringent than Canada’s for particulate matter but more relaxed for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone. Both countries employ advanced air quality monitoring and reporting systems, with Australia’s Air Quality Index and Canada’s Air Quality Health Index providing critical public health information. The study highlights the need for continuous improvement and a more integrated approach to air quality management. By examining the legislative and regulatory landscapes of Australia and Canada, this paper offers valuable insights for other countries striving to enhance their air quality governance and mitigate the adverse effects of air pollution on a global scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Shilpi Tewari & Nidhi Pandey & Jierui Dong, 2024. "Air Quality Legislation in Australia and Canada—A Review," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:15:y:2024:i:4:p:43-:d:1513513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/15/4/43/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/15/4/43/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:15:y:2024:i:4:p:43-:d:1513513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.