IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v5y2015i4p1224-1251d60248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grain Sorghum: A Conundrum for Chicken-Meat Production

Author

Listed:
  • Sonia Y. Liu

    (Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, 425 Werombi Road, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia)

  • Glen Fox

    (Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) Centre for Nutrition and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia)

  • Ali Khoddami

    (Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Karlie A. Neilson

    (Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

  • Ha H. Truong

    (Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, 425 Werombi Road, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia)

  • Amy F. Moss

    (Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, 425 Werombi Road, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia)

  • Peter H. Selle

    (Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, 425 Werombi Road, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia)

Abstract

The inclusion of grain sorghum in diets for broiler chickens is quite common; however, under Australian conditions, the utilisation of starch/energy by birds offered sorghum-based diets appears inadequate. Various factors inherent in sorghum, including kafirin, phenolic compounds and phytate, may limit energy utilisation. The recent quantification of kafirin, the dominant protein fraction in sorghum, has allowed its nutritional significance to be assessed. This is important as indirect evidence suggests that kafirin concentrations in local sorghums are increasing as an unintended consequence of breeding programs. Presently, Australian sorghums do not contain condensed tannin but, from analyses and assessments of other polyphenolic compounds and phenolic acids, “non-tannin” phenols appear to be negative influences. Anecdotally, white sorghums are considered to be superior to red varieties thus the fact that polyphenolic pigments are responsible for the “redness” of sorghum assumes relevance. Inclusions of sulphite reducing agents in broiler diets have generated promising responses but seem dependent on sorghum properties. Preliminary studies have shown the possibilities of using rapid visco-analyser (RVA) starch pasting profiles, promatest protein solubilities and grain textures to indicate sorghum quality and further studies are required to confirm these hypotheses. These assessments may indicate which sorghums will best respond to reducing agents such as sodium metabisulphite. Finally, the usually modest responses of broilers to exogenous feed enzyme inclusions in sorghum-based are considered in this review.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonia Y. Liu & Glen Fox & Ali Khoddami & Karlie A. Neilson & Ha H. Truong & Amy F. Moss & Peter H. Selle, 2015. "Grain Sorghum: A Conundrum for Chicken-Meat Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-28, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:5:y:2015:i:4:p:1224-1251:d:60248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/5/4/1224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/5/4/1224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank & Food and Agriculture Organization & International Fund for Agricultural Development, 2009. "Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook [Agricultura y desarrollo rural : manual sobre género en agricultura]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6603.
    2. -, 1986. "Agricultura en la óptica de la CEPAL," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 35707, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Edward K. Gilding & Celine H. Frère & Alan Cruickshank & Anna K. Rada & Peter J. Prentis & Agnieszka M. Mudge & Emma S. Mace & David R. Jordan & Ian D. Godwin, 2013. "Allelic variation at a single gene increases food value in a drought-tolerant staple cereal," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, June.
    4. Unknown, 1998. "Can Agriculture And Growth Coexist? Proceedings," Special Reports 14810, Virginia Tech, Rural Economic Analysis Program (REAP).
    5. Denise Wolter, 2009. "Ghana: Agriculture is Becoming a Business," OECD Journal: General Papers, OECD Publishing, vol. 2009(2), pages 9-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harris D. Ledvinka & Mehdi Toghyani & Daniel K. Y. Tan & Ali Khoddami & Ian D. Godwin & Sonia Y. Liu, 2022. "The Impact of Drought, Heat and Elevated Carbon Dioxide Levels on Feed Grain Quality for Poultry Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Tammi, Ilpo & Mustajärvi, Kaisa & Rasinmäki, Jussi, 2017. "Integrating spatial valuation of ecosystem services into regional planning and development," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PB), pages 329-344.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jenkins, Jesse D., 2014. "Political economy constraints on carbon pricing policies: What are the implications for economic efficiency, environmental efficacy, and climate policy design?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 467-477.
    2. Anne Clerval, 2016. "París contra el pueblo. La gentrificación de la capital," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Economía, edition 1, number 74, August.
    3. Óscar A. Alfonso R. & Carlos E. Alonso M., 2016. "Alimentación Para Las Metrópolis Colombianas. Fragilidad Territorial, Vulnerabilidad A Las Anomalías Del Clima Y Circulación De Agroalimentos," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Economía, edition 1, number 73, August.
    4. Jose Cuesta & Stephen Devereux & Abdul‐Gafaru Abdulai & Jaideep Gupte & Luigi Peter Ragno & Keetie Roelen & Rachel Sabates‐Wheeler & Tayllor Spadafora, 2021. "Urban social assistance: Evidence, challenges and the way forward, with application to Ghana," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(3), pages 360-380, May.
    5. Kevin D. Welch & Daniel Cook & Benedict T. Green & Dale R. Gardner & James A. Pfister & Tara G. McDaneld & Kip E. Panter, 2015. "Adverse Effects of Larkspur ( Delphinium spp.) on Cattle," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Andre Croppenstedt & Markus Goldstein & Nina Rosas, 2013. "Gender and Agriculture: Inefficiencies, Segregation, and Low Productivity Traps," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 79-109, February.
    7. Lizanne Wheeler & Lisa Kitinoja & Diane M. Barrett, 2015. "Use of Insulated Covers over Product Crates to Reduce Losses in Amaranth during Shipping Delays," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Joseph I. Uduji & Elda N. Okolo-Obasi, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives in Nigeria and Rural Women Livestock Keepers in Oil Host Communities," Research Africa Network Working Papers 18/060, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    9. Eric R. Morgan & Johannes Charlier & Guy Hendrickx & Annibale Biggeri & Dolores Catalan & Georg Von Samson-Himmelstjerna & Janina Demeler & Elizabeth Müller & Jan Van Dijk & Fiona Kenyon & Philip Skuc, 2013. "Global Change and Helminth Infections in Grazing Ruminants in Europe: Impacts, Trends and Sustainable Solutions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Burton, Laura J., 2015. "Underrepresentation of women in sport leadership: A review of research," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 155-165.
    11. Savath, Vivien & Fletschner, Diana & Peterman, Amber & Santos, Florence, 2014. "Land, assets, and livelihoods: Gendered analysis of evidence from Odisha State in India:," IFPRI discussion papers 1323, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Murata, Akira & Miyazaki, Suguru, 2014. "Ex-post Risk Management Among Rural Filipino Farm Households," Working Papers 67, JICA Research Institute.
    13. Dave Nyongesa & Martin Kiogora Mwirigi & David Yongo & Stella Makokha, 2016. "Gender-concerns: do they matter in smallholder dairy groups in Kenya?," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17.
    14. Terry Williams & Preston Hardison, 2013. "Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 531-544, October.
    15. Dzanku, Fred M., 2015. "Household-specific food price differentials and high-value crop production in rural Ghana," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 73-82.
    16. Bryan, Elizabeth & Behrman, Julia A., 2013. "Community–based adaptation to climate change: A theoretical framework, overview of key issues and discussion of gender differentiated priorities and participation," CAPRi working papers 109, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Woldu, Thomas & Tadesse, Fanaye & Waller, Marie-Katherine, 2013. "Women’s participation in agricultural cooperatives in Ethiopia:," ESSP working papers 57, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    18. Lata Gangadharan & Tarun Jain & Pushkar Maitra & Joseph Vecci, 2016. "The behavioural implications of women's empowerment programmes," WIDER Working Paper Series 064, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Joseph I. Uduji & Elda N. Okolo-Obasi, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives in Nigeria and Rural Women Livestock Keepers in Oil Host Communities," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 18/060, African Governance and Development Institute..
    20. Jain, Charu & Saxena, Disha & Sen, Somnath & Sanan, Deepak, 2023. "Women’s land ownership in India: Evidence from digital land records," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:5:y:2015:i:4:p:1224-1251:d:60248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.