IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i4p420-d1592804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sweet Potato Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Based on Multispectral Images Acquired from a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Author

Listed:
  • Kriti Singh

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA)

  • Yanbo Huang

    (USDA-ARS Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Wyatt Young

    (USDA-ARS Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Lorin Harvey

    (Pontotoc Ridge-Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS 38863, USA)

  • Mark Hall

    (Pontotoc Ridge-Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS 38863, USA)

  • Xin Zhang

    (Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Edgar Lobaton

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA)

  • Johnie Jenkins

    (USDA-ARS Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Mark Shankle

    (Pontotoc Ridge-Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS 38863, USA)

Abstract

Accurate prediction of sweet potato yield is crucial for effective crop management. This study investigates the use of vegetation indices (VIs) extracted from multispectral images acquired by a small unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) throughout the growing season, along with in situ-measured plant physiological parameters, to predict sweet potato yield. The data acquisition process through UAV field imaging is discussed in detail along with the extraction process for the multispectral bands that we use as features. The experiment is designed with a combination of different nitrogen application rates and cover crop treatments. The dependence of VIs and crop physiological parameters, such as leaf chlorophyll content, plant biomass, vine length, and leaf nitrogen content, on yield is evaluated through feature selection methods and model performance. Classical machine learning (ML) approaches and tree-based algorithms, like XGBoost and Random Forest, are implemented. Additionally, a soft-voting ML model ensemble approach is employed to improve performance of yield prediction. Individual models are trained and tested for different cover crop and nitrogen treatments to capture the relationships between the treatments and the target yield variable. The performance of the ML algorithms is evaluated using various popular model performance metrics like R 2 , RMSE, and MAE. Through modelling the data for cover crops and nitrogen treatment rates using individual models, the relationships and effects of different treatments on yield are explored. Important VIs useful for the study are identified through feature selection and model performance evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kriti Singh & Yanbo Huang & Wyatt Young & Lorin Harvey & Mark Hall & Xin Zhang & Edgar Lobaton & Johnie Jenkins & Mark Shankle, 2025. "Sweet Potato Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Based on Multispectral Images Acquired from a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:420-:d:1592804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/4/420/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/4/420/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peroni Venancio, Luan & Chartuni Mantovani, Everardo & do Amaral, Cibele Hummel & Usher Neale, Christopher Michael & Zution Gonçalves, Ivo & Filgueiras, Roberto & Coelho Eugenio, Fernando, 2020. "Potential of using spectral vegetation indices for corn green biomass estimation based on their relationship with the photosynthetic vegetation sub-pixel fraction," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Linsheng Huang & Yong Liu & Wenjiang Huang & Yingying Dong & Huiqin Ma & Kang Wu & Anting Guo, 2022. "Combining Random Forest and XGBoost Methods in Detecting Early and Mid-Term Winter Wheat Stripe Rust Using Canopy Level Hyperspectral Measurements," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Shirsath, Paresh B. & Aggarwal, P.K. & Thornton, P.K. & Dunnett, A., 2017. "Prioritizing climate-smart agricultural land use options at a regional scale," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 174-183.
    4. Zhonglin Ji & Yaozhong Pan & Xiufang Zhu & Dujuan Zhang & Jiajia Dai, 2022. "Prediction of Corn Yield in the USA Corn Belt Using Satellite Data and Machine Learning: From an Evapotranspiration Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adelhart Toorop, Roos & Ceccarelli, Viviana & Bijarniya, Deepak & Jat, Mangi Lal & Jat, Raj Kumar & Lopez-Ridaura, Santiago & Groot, Jeroen C.J., 2020. "Using a positive deviance approach to inform farming systems redesign: A case study from Bihar, India," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Jian Li & Jian Lu & Hongkun Fu & Wenlong Zou & Weijian Zhang & Weilin Yu & Yuxuan Feng, 2024. "Research on the Inversion of Key Growth Parameters of Rice Based on Multisource Remote Sensing Data and Deep Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Durga, Neha & Sikka, Alok & Verma, Shilp & Mitra, Archisman & Amarasinghe, Upali & Mahapatra, Smaranika, 2022. "Agricultural Water Management (AWM) typologies: targeting land-water management interventions towards improved water productivity," IWMI Books, Reports H051383, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Dunnett, A. & Shirsath, P.B. & Aggarwal, P.K. & Thornton, P. & Joshi, P.K. & Pal, B.D. & Khatri-Chhetri, A. & Ghosh, J., 2018. "Multi-objective land use allocation modelling for prioritizing climate-smart agricultural interventions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 381(C), pages 23-35.
    5. Hongpeng Guo & Yujie Xia & Chulin Pan & Qingyong Lei & Hong Pan, 2022. "Analysis in the Influencing Factors of Climate-Responsive Behaviors of Maize Growers: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Das, Usha & Ansari, M.A. & Ghosh, Souvik, 2022. "Effectiveness and upscaling potential of climate smart agriculture interventions: Farmers' participatory prioritization and livelihood indicators as its determinants," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. Arenas-Calle, Laura N. & Ramirez-Villegas, Julian & Whitfield, Stephen & Challinor, Andrew J., 2021. "Design of a Soil-based Climate-Smartness Index (SCSI) using the trend and variability of yields and soil organic carbon," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    8. Deo, Aniket & Shirsath, Paresh B. & Aggarwal, Pramod K., 2024. "Identifying resource-conscious and low-carbon agricultural development pathways through land use modelling," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Chang Meng & Mei Hong & Yuncai Hu & Fei Li, 2024. "Using Optimized Spectral Indices and Machine Learning Algorithms to Assess Soil Copper Concentration in Mining Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi & Bannayan, Mohammad & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2017. "Towards shifting planting date as an adaptation practice for rainfed wheat response to climate change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 108-119.
    11. Pankaj Das & Girish Kumar Jha & Achal Lama & Rajender Parsad, 2023. "Crop Yield Prediction Using Hybrid Machine Learning Approach: A Case Study of Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Mohammad Valipour & Jens Krasilnikof & Stavros Yannopoulos & Rohitashw Kumar & Jun Deng & Paolo Roccaro & Larry Mays & Mark E. Grismer & Andreas N. Angelakis, 2020. "The Evolution of Agricultural Drainage from the Earliest Times to the Present," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, January.
    13. Walsh, Conor & Renn, Mara & Klauser, Dominik & de Pinto, Alessandro & Haggar, Jeremy & Abdur, Rouf & Hopkins, Richard J. & Zamil, Farhad, 2024. "Translating theory into practice: A flexible decision-making tool to support the design and implementation of climate-smart agriculture projects," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Paresh B. Shirsath & Pramod K. Aggarwal, 2021. "Trade-Offs between Agricultural Production, GHG Emissions and Income in a Changing Climate, Technology, and Food Demand Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Anton Terentev & Vladimir Badenko & Ekaterina Shaydayuk & Dmitriy Emelyanov & Danila Eremenko & Dmitriy Klabukov & Alexander Fedotov & Viktor Dolzhenko, 2023. "Hyperspectral Remote Sensing for Early Detection of Wheat Leaf Rust Caused by Puccinia triticina," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Gonçalves, I.Z. & Ruhoff, A. & Laipelt, L. & Bispo, R.C. & Hernandez, F.B.T. & Neale, C.M.U. & Teixeira, A.H.C. & Marin, F.R., 2022. "Remote sensing-based evapotranspiration modeling using geeSEBAL for sugarcane irrigation management in Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    17. Zhiliang Kang & Jinping Geng & Rongsheng Fan & Yan Hu & Jie Sun & Youli Wu & Lijia Xu & Cheng Liu, 2022. "Nondestructive Testing Model of Mango Dry Matter Based on Fluorescence Hyperspectral Imaging Technology," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Alam, Mohammad Faiz & Durga, Neha & Sikka, Alok & Verma, Shilp & Mitra, Archisman & Amarasinghe, Upali & Mahapatra, Smaranika, 2022. "Agricultural Water Management (AWM) typologies: targeting land-water management interventions towards improved water productivity," IWMI Reports 329168, International Water Management Institute.
    19. Thornton, Philip K. & Whitbread, Anthony & Baedeker, Tobias & Cairns, Jill & Claessens, Lieven & Baethgen, Walter & Bunn, Christian & Friedmann, Michael & Giller, Ken E. & Herrero, Mario & Howden, Mar, 2018. "A framework for priority-setting in climate smart agriculture research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 161-175.
    20. Qaisar Saddique & Huanjie Cai & Jiatun Xu & Ali Ajaz & Jianqiang He & Qiang Yu & Yunfei Wang & Hui Chen & Muhammad Imran Khan & De Li Liu & Liang He, 2020. "Analyzing adaptation strategies for maize production under future climate change in Guanzhong Plain, China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 1523-1543, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:420-:d:1592804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.