IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i4p417-d1592561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Impact of EU Expenditures Under Agricultural Priorities on Energy Sustainability in CEE Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Nicoleta Mihaela Doran

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Economic Analysis, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 13 A. I. Cuza, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Gabriela Badareu

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Economic Analysis, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 13 A. I. Cuza, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Marius Dalian Doran

    (Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Mihai Alexandru Firu

    (Doctoral School of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 13 A. I. Cuza, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Anamaria Liliana Staicu

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Economic Analysis, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 13 A. I. Cuza, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of EU agricultural expenditures on renewable energy production and energy efficiency in the agricultural sector across nine Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries over the period 2015–2022. The analysis is based on a panel dataset compiled from European Commission databases, incorporating annual expenditures under five Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) priorities, as well as indicators of renewable energy production and direct energy consumption in agriculture and forestry. Using panel regression models, the study assesses how different CAP funding priorities influence energy sustainability outcomes. The findings indicate that certain funding priorities significantly contribute to renewable energy adoption, while others have a limited effect, emphasizing the need for a more targeted policy approach. The results also highlight regional disparities in the effectiveness of CAP funding, suggesting that farm structure, institutional capacity, and climate conditions mediate the impact of EU expenditures on energy sustainability. These insights contribute to the ongoing discourse on optimizing EU funding mechanisms to support a sustainable agricultural transition in the CEE region.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Gabriela Badareu & Marius Dalian Doran & Mihai Alexandru Firu & Anamaria Liliana Staicu, 2025. "Evaluating the Impact of EU Expenditures Under Agricultural Priorities on Energy Sustainability in CEE Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:417-:d:1592561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/4/417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/4/417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathijs, Erik & Swinnen, Johan F M, 1998. "The Economics of Agricultural Decollectivization in East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(1), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Francisco Manuel Martínez García & Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2024. "Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) on the Development of Rural Territories: Principal Component Analysis in SW Spain, Extremadura (2007–2020)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Błażej Suproń & Janusz Myszczyszyn, 2024. "Impact of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption on the Production of the Agricultural Sector in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Mihaly Himics & Thomas Fellmann & Jesus Barreiro‐Hurle, 2020. "Setting Climate Action as the Priority for the Common Agricultural Policy: A Simulation Experiment," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 50-69, February.
    5. Francisco Manuel Martínez García & Ana Nieto Masot & Gema Cárdenas Alonso & José Manuel Pérez Pintor, 2023. "The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in Extremadura (SW Spain) during the Period 2014–2020:New Opportunities for Economic Diversification in Rural Areas?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Alina Georgiana Manta & Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Gabriela Badareu & Claudia Gherțescu & Cătălin Valentin Mihai Lăpădat, 2024. "Does Common Agricultural Policy Influence Regional Disparities and Environmental Sustainability in European Union Countries?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, December.
    7. Ioan Prigoreanu & Bianca Antonela Ungureanu & George Ungureanu & Gabriela Ignat, 2024. "Analysis of Sustainable Energy and Environmental Policies in Agriculture in the EU Regarding the European Green Deal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-31, December.
    8. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Pietrzak, Michał Bernard & Kiełkowska, Urszula & Skrzatek, Mateusz & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Piechota, Grzegorz, 2022. "The assessment of renewable energy in Poland on the background of the world renewable energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    9. Marcela Taušová & Lucia Domaracká & Katarína Čulková & Peter Tauš & Pavol Kaňuch, 2024. "Development of Energy Poverty and Its Solutions through the Use of Renewables: The EU Case with a Focus on Slovakia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Ahmad Bathaei & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Sustainable Agriculture: Review of Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Wang, Lei & Su, Chi Wei & Liu, Jing & Dong, Yuxing, 2024. "Sustainable development or smoke?: The role of natural resources, renewable energy, and agricultural practices in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Zhang, Jinjun & Irfan, Muhammad & Alvarado, Rafael, 2022. "Analyze the environmental sustainability factors of China: The role of fossil fuel energy and renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 390-402.
    13. Gabriela Badareu & Marius Dalian Doran & Mihai Alexandru Firu & Ionuț Marius Croitoru & Nicoleta Mihaela Doran, 2024. "Exploring the Role of Robots and Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Renewable Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Tokhtar Bolyssov & Bauyrzhan Yessengeldin & Gulvira Akybayeva & Zamzagul Sultanova & Azamat Zhanseitov, 2019. "Features of the Use of Renewable Energy Sources in Agriculture," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 363-368.
    15. Mufutau Opeyemi, Bello, 2021. "Path to sustainable energy consumption: The possibility of substituting renewable energy for non-renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    16. Simone Severini & Cinzia Zinnanti & Valeria Borsellino & Emanuele Schimmenti, 2021. "EU income stabilization tool: potential impacts, financial sustainability and farmer’s risk aversion," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Manuel Martínez García & Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2024. "Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) on the Development of Rural Territories: Principal Component Analysis in SW Spain, Extremadura (2007–2020)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Zheng, Li & Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Salem, Sultan & Irfan, Muhammad & Alvarado, Rafael & Lv, Kangjuan, 2022. "How technological innovation and institutional quality affect sectoral energy consumption in Pakistan? Fresh policy insights from novel econometric approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jan Pokrivcak, 2008. "Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content of Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2008_03, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    4. Czekała, Wojciech & Łukomska, Aleksandra & Pulka, Jakub & Bojarski, Wiktor & Pochwatka, Patrycja & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Oniszczuk, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "Waste-to-energy: Biogas potential of waste from coffee production and consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Lanre Ibrahim, Ridwan & Bello Ajide, Kazeem & Usman, Muhammad & Kousar, Rakhshanda, 2022. "Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 244-256.
    6. Kiehbadroudinezhad, Mohammadali & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Pan, Junting & Peng, Wanxi & Wang, Yajing & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2023. "The potential of aquatic weed as a resource for sustainable bioenergy sources and bioproducts production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    7. Kristiana Dolge & Dagnija Blumberga, 2023. "Transitioning to Clean Energy: A Comprehensive Analysis of Renewable Electricity Generation in the EU-27," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Gorjian, Shiva & Bousi, Erion & Özdemir, Özal Emre & Trommsdorff, Max & Kumar, Nallapaneni Manoj & Anand, Abhishek & Kant, Karunesh & Chopra, Shauhrat S., 2022. "Progress and challenges of crop production and electricity generation in agrivoltaic systems using semi-transparent photovoltaic technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Zhou, Li & Li, Fashe & Duan, Yaozong & Wang, Hua, 2023. "Effect of phospholipids on the premixed combustion behavior of Jatropha curcas biodiesel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    10. Zhou, Yuanxiang & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday & Yin, Weichuan & Abbas, Shujaat, 2023. "The co-movements among renewable energy, total environmental tax, and ecological footprint in the United Kingdom: Evidence from wavelet local multiple correlation analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Rizov, Marian, 2005. "Human capital and the agrarian structure in transition: Micro evidence from Romania," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 119-149.
    12. Lijuan Zhang & Tatyana Ponomarenko, 2023. "Directions for Sustainable Development of China’s Coal Industry in the Post-Epidemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    13. Wolz, Axel & Kopsidis, Michael & Reinsberg, Klaus, 2009. "The Transformation of Agricultural Production Cooperatives in East Germany and Their Future," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 37(01), pages 1-15.
    14. Xu, Yizhen & Qin, Botao & Shi, Quanlin & Hao, Mingyue & Shao, Xu & Jiang, Zhe & Ma, Zujie, 2023. "Study on the preparation and properties of colloidal gas foam concrete to prevent spontaneous combustion of coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    15. Mathijs, Erik & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 1997. "Agricultural Decollectivization in Central and Eastern Europe," 1997 Conference, August 10-16, 1997, Sacramento, California 197062, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Lingling Zhou & Tao Shi & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Is ICT Development Conducive to Reducing the Vulnerability of Low-Carbon Energy? Evidence from OECD Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-22, January.
    17. De Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth & Murgai, Rinku, 2002. "Rural development and rural policy," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 31, pages 1593-1658, Elsevier.
    18. Tang, Juan & Jiang, Yanyan, 2024. "Natural resources-environment dilemma: The context of foreign direct investment and international trade," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    19. Zhou, Runyu & Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Salem, Sultan & Almulhim, Abdulaziz.I. & Alvarado, Rafael, 2022. "Do natural resources, economic growth, human capital, and urbanization affect the ecological footprint? A modified dynamic ARDL and KRLS approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Yinhui Wang & Yugang He & Xiaodan Gao, 2025. "Synergizing Renewable Energy and Circular Economy Strategies: Pioneering Pathways to Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:417-:d:1592561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.