IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i3p432-d1352800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Experiment of Oil-Electric Hybrid Air-Suction Sorghum Plot Seeder

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Yuan

    (College of Engineering, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China)

  • Caojun Huang

    (College of Information and Electrical Engineering, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China)

  • Guixiang Tao

    (College of Engineering, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China)

  • Shujuan Yi

    (College of Engineering, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China)

  • Yifei Li

    (College of Engineering, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China)

Abstract

To tackle the issues of low seeding accuracy and seed injury caused by the seeders utilized at a small scale and in the plot seeding of sorghum in mountainous or hilly regions, this study presents the design of an oil–electric hybrid air suction sorghum plot seeder. The main working parts of the seeder are described, and the performance of the seed-mixing device is simulated using EDEM software. An oil–electric hybrid drive mode is used to provide power for operation and to the seed-metering device and fan. Additionally, a sowing control and monitoring system is designed using a single-chip microcomputer controller to ensure uniform plant spacing at different forward speeds. A multi-factor experiment is conducted using the central synthesis method to determine the optimal operating parameters of the seed-metering device through bench tests. The results show that a profile hole diameter of 2.5 mm on the seed tray, a negative-pressure chamber vacuum of 8.0 kPa, and a seed-metering device speed of 28 r/min result in a 95.95% pass rate, 0.5% missing rate, and 3.55% reseeding rate. The deviation between the experimental and analytical results that validate the optimum parameters is kept within acceptable limits. Field tests are conducted at different forward speeds using the optimum parameter combinations, and a comparison is made with the widely used duckbill planter. The results show pass, missing, and reseeding rates of 94.41%, 2.3%, and 3.29%, respectively. The missing monitoring error is less than 7.19%. All of the indices of the oil–electric hybrid air suction sorghum plot seeder are superior to those of the duckbill planter; thus, it fulfills the agronomic requirements for seeding a sorghum plot.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Yuan & Caojun Huang & Guixiang Tao & Shujuan Yi & Yifei Li, 2024. "Design and Experiment of Oil-Electric Hybrid Air-Suction Sorghum Plot Seeder," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:432-:d:1352800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/432/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/432/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mubarak Aduov & Saule Nukusheva & Talgat Tulegenov & Kadirbek Volodya & Kanat Uteulov & Bolesław Karwat & Michał Bembenek, 2023. "Experimental Field Tests of the Suitability of a New Seeder for the Soils of Northern Kazakhstan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Jayson Beckman & Maros Ivanic & Jeremy Jelliffe, 2022. "Market impacts of Farm to Fork: Reducing agricultural input usage," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1995-2013, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Dell’Unto & Gabriele Dono & Raffaele Cortignani, 2023. "Impacts of Environmental Targets on the Livestock Sector: An Assessment Tool Applied to Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Maros Ivanic & Jayson Beckman & Noe Nava, 2023. "Estimation of the Value-Added/Intermediate Input Substitution Elasticities Consistent with the GTAP Data," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 8(2), pages 134-158, December.
    3. Keith Fuglie & Srabashi Ray & Uris Lantz C. Baldos & Thomas W. Hertel, 2022. "The R&D cost of climate mitigation in agriculture," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1955-1974, December.
    4. Sun Ling Wang & Nicholas Rada & Ryan Williams & Doris Newton, 2022. "Accounting for climatic effects in measuring U.S. field crop farm productivity," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1975-1994, December.
    5. Yingzhou Xianyu & Hua Long & Zhifeng Wang & Long Meng & Feiyu Duan, 2024. "The Impact of Tea Farmers’ Cognition on Green Production Behavior in Jingmai Mountain: Chain Mediation by Social and Personal Norms and the Moderating Role of Government Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:432-:d:1352800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.