IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i9p1659-d1222864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential of Adjuvants Used with Microbiological Control of Insect Pests with Emphasis on Organic Farming

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Holka

    (Department of Organic Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland)

  • Jolanta Kowalska

    (Department of Organic Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Biological plant protection is a crucial component of integrated pest management strategies. It is considered a safer alternative to chemical plant protection, with reduced risks to human health and the environment. The significance of biological plant protection has been on the rise, driven by the European Union’s mandate to decrease the reliance on chemical pesticides, the discontinuation of certain chemical active substances, and their limited availability. Microbiological plant protection products find application in organic farming systems. Among these, mycoinsecticides are prominent examples, utilizing insecticidal fungi such as Beauveria bassiana , Cordyceps fumosoroseus , C. farinosa , and Metarhizium anisopliae complex. Due to the high sensitivity of these organisms to unfavorable weather and environmental conditions, their use in the protection of field crops may not bring the desired effect. The enhancement of their efficacy may be accomplished through the use of adjuvants. Adjuvants are substances incorporated into plant protection products, including microbial insecticides, or used alone to enhance their effectiveness. They can play a pivotal role in improving the performance of mycoinsecticides by ensuring better coverage on plant surfaces and increasing the likelihood of successful pest control, thereby contributing to the overall success of biological methods of pest control. Consequently, it becomes imperative to investigate the impact of various adjuvants on the survival and effectiveness of microorganisms. Furthermore, there is no officially approved list of adjuvants for use in organic farming, the use of inadequate adjuvant may result in failure to obtain an organic certificate. The origin of adjuvants determines their classification, which significantly impacts for employment in organic farming practices. Included tables provide a list of adjuvants and additives known to enhance the efficacy of pest and disease control.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Holka & Jolanta Kowalska, 2023. "The Potential of Adjuvants Used with Microbiological Control of Insect Pests with Emphasis on Organic Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1659-:d:1222864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1659/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1659/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Olympia Papaevangelou, 2022. "Role of Crop-Protection Technologies in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity and Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Esteban F. Durán-Lara & Aly Valderrama & Adolfo Marican, 2020. "Natural Organic Compounds for Application in Organic Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Emmanuel O. Fenibo & Grace N. Ijoma & Weiz Nurmahomed & Tonderayi Matambo, 2022. "The Potential and Green Chemistry Attributes of Biopesticides for Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.
    4. David Pimentel & Michael Burgess, 2012. "Small amounts of pesticides reaching target insects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-2, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Majchrowska-Safaryan & Cezary Tkaczuk & Marta Wrzosek, 2024. "The Effect of Humic Substances on the Colony Growth and Conidial Germination of Entomopathogenic Fungi from the Genus Metarhizium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-10, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigino Barisan & Marco Lucchetta & Cristian Bolzonella & Vasco Boatto, 2019. "How Does Carbon Footprint Create Shared Values in the Wine Industry? Empirical Evidence from Prosecco Superiore PDO’s Wine District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Hua Zhang & Qiwang Zhang & Man An & Zixuan Zhang & Nanqiao He, 2023. "Unveiling the Impact of Digital Financial Inclusion on Low-Carbon Green Utilization of Farmland: The Roles of Farmland Transfer and Management Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Inmaculada Carrasco & Juan Sebastián Castillo-Valero & Carmen Córcoles & Marcos Carchano, 2021. "Greening Wine Exports? Changes in the Carbon Footprint of Spanish Wine Exports," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Kalogiannidis, Stavros & Syndoukas, Dimitrios, 2024. "The Impact of Agricultural Extension Services on Farm Output: A Worldwide Viewpoint," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(1), March.
    5. Yigit Kazancoglu & Cisem Lafci & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes & Yalcin Berberoglu, 2024. "The role of agri‐food 4.0 in climate‐smart farming for controlling climate change‐related risks: A business perspective analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2788-2802, May.
    6. Jan Buczek & Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek & Elżbieta Harasim & Cezary A. Kwiatkowski & Ireneusz Kapusta, 2023. "Effect of Cropping Systems and Environment on Phenolic Acid Profiles and Yielding of Hybrid Winter Wheat Genotypes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Muhammad Younas & Huasong Zou & Tasmia Laraib & Waseem Abbas & Muhammad Waqar Akhtar & Muhammad Naveed Aslam & Luqman Amrao & Shoukat Hayat & Tariq Abdul Hamid & Akhtar Hameed & Ghalib Ayaz Kachelo & , 2021. "The influence of vermicomposting on photosynthetic activity and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) crop under semi-arid climate," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-9, August.
    8. Xiaohong Zhou & Donghong Ding, 2022. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Willingness and Behaviors in Organic Agriculture Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on Survey Data of Farmers in Anhui Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Nakhaii, Fatemeh & Ghanbari, Seyed Ahmad & Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Seyedabadi, Esmaeel & Sciubba, Enrico, 2024. "Evaluating ecological sustainability of mechanized and traditional systems of damaskrose production using extended exergy analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    10. Dezhong Duan & Hong Jin, 2022. "Environmental Regulation and Green Technology Diffusion: A Case Study of Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Dimitrios Kalfas & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2022. "Forestry Bioeconomy Contribution on Socioeconomic Development: Evidence from Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Oekan S. Abdoellah & Indri Wulandari & Kinanti Indah Safitri & Nafa Destri Fianti & Rahma Maulia Fadli Basagevan & Mega Nurul Aini & Rosalina Ilmi Amalia & Mahardhika Puspa Arum Suraloka & Gemilang La, 2023. "Urban Agriculture in Great Bandung Region in the Midst of Commercialization, Food Insecurity, and Nutrition Inadequacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1659-:d:1222864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.