IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i8p1622-d1219213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning Approaches for Forecasting the Best Microbial Strains to Alleviate Drought Impact in Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Tymoteusz Miller

    (Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland
    Polish Society of Bioinformatics and Data Science BIODATA, Popiełuszki 4c, 71-214 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Mikiciuk

    (Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Anna Kisiel

    (Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland
    Polish Society of Bioinformatics and Data Science BIODATA, Popiełuszki 4c, 71-214 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Mikiciuk

    (Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Dominika Paliwoda

    (Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Lidia Sas-Paszt

    (Department of Microbiology and Rhizosphere, The National Institute of Horticultural Research, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland)

  • Danuta Cembrowska-Lech

    (Polish Society of Bioinformatics and Data Science BIODATA, Popiełuszki 4c, 71-214 Szczecin, Poland
    Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Adrianna Krzemińska

    (Polish Society of Bioinformatics and Data Science BIODATA, Popiełuszki 4c, 71-214 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Kozioł

    (Institute of Technology and Life Sciences–National Research Institute, Falenty, Hrabska Avenue 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Adam Brysiewicz

    (Institute of Technology and Life Sciences–National Research Institute, Falenty, Hrabska Avenue 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

Abstract

Drought conditions pose significant challenges to sustainable agriculture and food security. Identifying microbial strains that can mitigate drought effects is crucial to enhance crop resilience and productivity. This study presents a comprehensive comparison of several machine learning models, including Random Forest, Decision Tree, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), to predict optimal microbial strains for this purpose. Models were assessed on multiple metrics, such as accuracy, standard deviation of results, gains, total computation time, and training time per 1000 rows of data. Notably, the Gradient Boosted Trees model outperformed others in accuracy but required extensive computational resources. This underscores the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency in machine learning applications. Leveraging machine learning for selecting microbial strains signifies a leap beyond traditional methods, offering improved efficiency and efficacy. These insights hold profound implications for agriculture, especially concerning drought mitigation, thus furthering the cause of sustainable agriculture and ensuring food security.

Suggested Citation

  • Tymoteusz Miller & Grzegorz Mikiciuk & Anna Kisiel & Małgorzata Mikiciuk & Dominika Paliwoda & Lidia Sas-Paszt & Danuta Cembrowska-Lech & Adrianna Krzemińska & Agnieszka Kozioł & Adam Brysiewicz, 2023. "Machine Learning Approaches for Forecasting the Best Microbial Strains to Alleviate Drought Impact in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1622-:d:1219213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1622/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1622/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hugo Storm & Kathy Baylis & Thomas Heckelei, 2020. "Machine learning in agricultural and applied economics," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(3), pages 849-892.
    2. Matthias Schonlau & Rosie Yuyan Zou, 2020. "The random forest algorithm for statistical learning," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(1), pages 3-29, March.
    3. Bogumił Kamiński & Michał Jakubczyk & Przemysław Szufel, 2018. "A framework for sensitivity analysis of decision trees," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 135-159, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sascha O. Becker, Sascha O & Voth, Hans-Joachim, 2023. "From the Death of God to the Rise of Hitler," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1478, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    2. Feras A. Batarseh & Munisamy Gopinath & Anderson Monken, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence Methods for Evaluating Global Trade Flows," International Finance Discussion Papers 1296, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    3. Deac Dan Stelian & Schebesch Klaus Bruno, 2018. "Market Forecasts and Client Behavioral Data: Towards Finding Adequate Model Complexity," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 50-75, September.
    4. Aslihan Arslan, Romina Cavatassi, Marup Hossain, 2022. "Research Series 69: Structural and rural transformation and food systems: a quantitative synthesis for LMICs," IFAD Research Series 320720, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    5. Xiaxuan He & Qifeng Yuan & Yinghong Qin & Junwen Lu & Gang Li, 2024. "Analysis of Surface Urban Heat Island in the Guangzhou-Foshan Metropolitan Area Based on Local Climate Zones," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-34, October.
    6. Robert Huber & Hang Xiong & Kevin Keller & Robert Finger, 2022. "Bridging behavioural factors and standard bio‐economic modelling in an agent‐based modelling framework," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 35-63, February.
    7. Becker, Sascha O. & Voth, Hans-Joachim, 2023. "From the Death of God to the Rise of Hitler," CEPR Discussion Papers 18543, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Ziesmer, Johannes & Jin, Ding & Mukashov, Askar & Henning, Christian, 2023. "Integrating fundamental model uncertainty in policy analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    9. Paolo Libenzio Brignoli & Alessandro Varacca & Cornelis Gardebroek & Paolo Sckokai, 2024. "Machine learning to predict grains futures prices," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(3), pages 479-497, May.
    10. Silvia Coderoni & Roberto Esposti & Alessandro Varacca, 2024. "How Differently Do Farms Respond to Agri-environmental Policies? A Probabilistic Machine-Learning Approach," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 100(2), pages 370-397.
    11. Sakiru Adebola Solarin & Muhammed Sehid Gorus & Onder Ozgur, 2024. "Modelling the economic effect of inbound birth tourism: a random forest algorithm approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4223-4240, October.
    12. Murat Aslan & Onder Ozgur, 2024. "Financial dollarization and its effects on inflation and output in Turkey: a machine learning approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5777-5804, December.
    13. Maria A. F. Silva Dias & Yania Molina Souto & Bruno Biazeto & Enzo Todesco & Jose A. Zuñiga Mora & Dylana Vargas Navarro & Melvin Pérez Chinchilla & Carlos Madrigal Araya & Dayanna Arce Fernández & Be, 2024. "Reduction of Wind Speed Forecast Error in Costa Rica Tejona Wind Farm with Artificial Intelligence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Muhammed Sehid Gorus & Erdal Tanas Karagol, 2023. "Factors affecting per capita ecological footprint in OECD countries: Evidence from machine learning techniquesa," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(7), pages 2601-2618, November.
    15. Tomasz Rymarczyk & Konrad Niderla & Edward Kozłowski & Krzysztof Król & Joanna Maria Wyrwisz & Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed & Piotr Gołąbek, 2021. "Logistic Regression with Wave Preprocessing to Solve Inverse Problem in Industrial Tomography for Technological Process Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Kinne, Jan & Krüger, Miriam, 2021. "The strength of weak and strong ties in bridging geographic and cognitive distances," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-049, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Man-, ZuyiKeunZuyi Wang & Takagi, Chifumi & Kim, Man-Keun & Chung, Anh, 2022. "Uncover Drivers Influencing Consumers' WTP Using Machine Learning: Case of Organic Coffee in Taiwan," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322150, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Lamperti, Fabio, 2024. "Unlocking machine learning for social sciences: The case for identifying Industry 4.0 adoption across business restructuring events," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    19. Yongtong Shao & Tao Xiong & Minghao Li & Dermot Hayes & Wendong Zhang & Wei Xie, 2021. "China's Missing Pigs: Correcting China's Hog Inventory Data Using a Machine Learning Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 1082-1098, May.
    20. Cao, An N.Q. & Gebrekidan, Bisrat Haile & Heckelei, Thomas & Robe, Michel A., 2022. "County-level USDA Crop Progress and Condition data, machine learning, and commodity market surprises," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322281, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1622-:d:1219213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.