IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i6p1268-d1174413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation Research on Cotton Stalk Cutting and Crushing Based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA and Field Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Wang

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
    Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Research Institute of Measurement & Testing, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Xuegeng Chen

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
    Key Laboratory of Northwest Agricultural Equipment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Haojun Wen

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
    Key Laboratory of Northwest Agricultural Equipment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shihezi 832000, China)

Abstract

In order to solve the problem of high straw content in recovered residual film and the low rate of qualified straw crushing in combination with a front-mounted cotton-straw-crushing device, the cutting and crushing mechanisms of cotton stalks were studied based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA. The height h and dip angle α of the fixed blade were determined to be 30 mm and 75° through a finite element analysis. On the basis of the device design, explicit dynamic models of the cutting and crushing of a single cotton stalk were established based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA. The results of the dynamic analysis revealed the cutting mechanism of the cotton stalk, and the influences of the cutting edge angle γ and front baffle height h 1 on cotton stalk cutting were studied by using single-factor simulation tests. An edge angle of γ = 45° and a height of h 1 = 265 mm were determined. Meanwhile, the mechanism of cotton straw crushing was revealed, and the motion states of the straw were studied at different times. The results of the simulation experiments on the influence of the cutter shaft’s rotational speed showed that with an increase in the cutter shaft’s speed, the rate of qualified crushing and the removal rate were both increased. At the design speed of n = 1800 RPM, the rate of qualified crushing was 84.6%, and the removal rate was 95.1%. Then, field experiments were carried out. The test results were as follows: the stubble height was 8.0 cm, the rate of qualified straw crushing was 91.8%, the clearance rate of film-surface impurities was 92.3%, and the film content was 3.6%, which met the working quality requirements (not less than 85%) of NYT 500-2015: “Operating quality for straw-smashing machines”.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Wang & Xuegeng Chen & Haojun Wen, 2023. "Simulation Research on Cotton Stalk Cutting and Crushing Based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA and Field Experiments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:6:p:1268-:d:1174413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/6/1268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/6/1268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Wang & Xuegeng Chen & Haojun Wen, 2022. "Research and Experiment on the Removal Mechanism of Light Impurities of the Residual Mulch Film Recovery Machine," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Baoqing Chen & Jixiao Cui & Wenyi Dong & Changrong Yan, 2023. "Effects of Biodegradable Plastic Film on Carbon Footprint of Crop Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-9, March.
    3. Silin Cao & Jianhua Xie & Hezheng Wang & Yuxin Yang & Yanhong Zhang & Jinbao Zhou & Shihua Wu, 2022. "Design and Operating Parameters Optimization of the Hook-and-Tooth Chain Rail Type Residual Film Picking Device," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustafa Ucgul & Chung-Liang Chang, 2023. "Design and Application of Agricultural Equipment in Tillage Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-3, March.
    2. Can Hu & Zhengxin Xu & Xufeng Wang & Long Wang & Jianfei Xing & Wensong Guo, 2022. "Experimental Study on Optimal Recycling Mechanical Parameters of Cotton Field Mulch film based on Small Soil Trough System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Mengyu Guo & Bin Hu & Xin Luo & Chenglin Yuan & Yiquan Cai & Luochuan Xu, 2023. "Design and Test of a Sliding Cutting Device for the Plastic Mulch Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Liang, Yonghui & Wen, Yue & Meng, Yu & Li, Haiqiang & Song, Libing & Zhang, Jinzhu & Ma, Zhanli & Han, Yue & Wang, Zhenhua, 2024. "Effects of biodegradable film types and drip irrigation amounts on maize growth and field carbon sequestration in arid northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    5. Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Ewelina Włodarczyk, 2023. "Comparison of Carbon Footprint Analysis Methods in Grain Processing—Studies Using Flour Production as an Example," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Deli Jiang & Xuegeng Chen & Limin Yan & Haixiao Gou & Jiacheng Yang & Ying Li, 2023. "Parameter Calibration of Discrete Element Model for Cotton Rootstalk–Soil Mixture at Harvest Stage in Xinjiang Cotton Field," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:6:p:1268-:d:1174413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.