IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i5p1036-d1143855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Livelihood Determine Attitude? The Impact of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital on the Performance of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution Management: An Empirical Investigation in Yilong Lake Basin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Zhou

    (School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Fanglei Zhong

    (School of Economics, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yanjie Yin

    (School of Economics, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Agricultural non-point source pollution is intricately connected to the rural population’s production and lifestyle. The heterogeneous composition of livelihood capital results in varied livelihood types, influencing the farmers’ attitudes and perceptions of the treatment projects. This ultimately causes discrepancies in the farmers’ evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution control. In this study, a participatory evaluation method was employed to evaluate the performance of agricultural non-point source pollution control projects in the Yilong Lake Watershed of Yunnan Province and analyze the underlying reasons for the differing performance evaluations. The findings revealed that pure farmers’ performance evaluation value for agricultural non-point source pollution control projects in Yilong Lake Basin was 0.4811 (with the full mark being 1), with a general evaluation grade. Part-time business households had a performance evaluation value of 0.5969, also with a general evaluation grade, while non-farmers had a performance evaluation value of 0.7057, with a good evaluation grade. The performance evaluation value ranked from highest to lowest is non-farmer > part-time farmer > pure farmer. The main factor affecting the variation in farmers’ performance evaluation is the key index of different livelihood capital. If pollution control projects can promote the adjustment of farmers’ livelihood capital types, it can enhance not only the performance evaluation degree of farmers, but also the sustainability of farmers’ livelihoods and increase their adaptability to livelihood risks. Therefore, pollution control projects should consider farmers’ livelihood capital types and be implemented accurately to improve farmers’ satisfaction and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Zhou & Fanglei Zhong & Yanjie Yin, 2023. "Does Livelihood Determine Attitude? The Impact of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital on the Performance of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution Management: An Empirical Investigation in Yilong Lake Basin,," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1036-:d:1143855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/5/1036/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/5/1036/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Plunge, Svajunas & Gudas, Mindaugas & Povilaitis, Arvydas, 2022. "Effectiveness of best management practices for non-point source agricultural water pollution control with changing climate – Lithuania’s case," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Lingyan Xu & Zhuoyun Zhou & Jianguo Du, 2020. "An Evolutionary Game Model for the Multi-Agent Co-Governance of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution Control under Intensive Management Pattern in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Simonetta De Leo & Antonella Di Fonzo & Sabrina Giuca & Marco Gaito & Guido Bonati, 2023. "Economic Implications for Farmers in Adopting Climate Adaptation Measures in Italian Agriculture," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-10, April.
    4. Camacho-Cuena, Eva & Requate, Till, 2012. "The regulation of non-point source pollution and risk preferences: An experimental approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 179-187.
    5. Wan, Wei & Han, Yiwen & Wu, Hanqing & Liu, Fan & Liu, Zhong, 2021. "Application of the source–sink landscape method in the evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution: First estimation of an orchard-dominated area in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pankaj Kumar & Vinod Kumar, 2024. "Preface to the Special Issue “Agricultural Environmental Pollution, Risk Assessment, and Control”," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-3, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Attallah, May & Abildtrup, Jens & Stenger, Anne, 2022. "Non-monetary incentives for sustainable biomass harvest: An experimental approach," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Dieter Schmidtchen & Jenny Helstroffer & Christian Koboldt, 2021. "Regulatory failure and the polluter pays principle: why regulatory impact assessment dominates the polluter pays principle," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(1), pages 109-144, January.
    3. Alfarano, Simone & Eva, Camacho & Josep, Domènech, 2010. "Estimation of a simple genetic algorithm applied to a laboratory experiment," MPRA Paper 24138, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Xuekai Chen & Guojian He & Xiaobo Liu & Bogen Li & Wenqi Peng & Fei Dong & Aiping Huang & Weijie Wang & Qiuyue Lian, 2021. "Sub-Watershed Parameter Transplantation Method for Non-Point Source Pollution Estimation in Complex Underlying Surface Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Tiening Cui & Zhang Si, 2022. "Driving Mechanism for Multi-Level Governance of Domestic Waste Sorting Based on Social Network Analysis and Interpretative Structural Modeling," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(6), pages 1-7.
    6. François Cochard & Julie Le Gallo & Laurent Franckx, 2015. "Regulation Of Pollution In The Laboratory: Random Inspections, Ambient Inspections, And Commitment Problems," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(S1), pages 40-73, December.
    7. James Shortle & Richard D. Horan, 2013. "Policy Instruments for Water Quality Protection," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 5(1), pages 111-138, June.
    8. Qizheng He & Yong Sun & Maoan Yi, 2023. "Evolutionary Game of Pesticide Reduction Management for Sustainable Agriculture: An Analysis Based on Local Governments, Farmers, and Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Kanthilanka, H. & Ramilan, T. & Farquharson, R.J. & Weerahewa, J., 2023. "Optimal nitrogen fertilizer decisions for rice farming in a cascaded tank system in Sri Lanka: An analysis using an integrated crop, hydro-nutrient and economic model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Lingyan Xu & Jing Jiang & Mengyi Lu & Jianguo Du, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Agricultural Intensive Management and Its Influence on Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Liping Tian & Baixing Yan & Yang Ou & Huiping Liu & Lei Cheng & Peng Jiao, 2022. "Effectiveness of Exogenous Fe 2+ on Nutrient Removal in Gravel-Based Constructed Wetlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Wenke Wang & Jue Wang & Kebei Liu & Yenchun Jim Wu, 2020. "Overcoming Barriers to Agriculture Green Technology Diffusion through Stakeholders in China: A Social Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Kaczan, David & Pfaff, Alexander & Rodriguez, Luz & Shapiro-Garza, Elizabeth, 2017. "Increasing the impact of collective incentives in payments for ecosystem services," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 48-67.
    14. Kun Li & Junchen Chen & Jingyu Lin & Huanyu Zhang & Yujing Xie & Zhaohua Li & Ling Wang, 2022. "Identifying Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Their Response to Landscape Patterns at Different Scales in an Agricultural Basin in Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Kiet T. Nguyen, 2020. "Formal versus Informal System to Mitigate Non‐point Source Pollution: An Experimental Investigation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 838-852, September.
    16. Feixiao Wang & Yaoqun Xu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Quality of Agricultural Products in Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Lin Feng & Lingyan Xu & Zhuoyun Zhou & Jianguo Du & Dandan Wang, 2022. "The Influence of Social Preference and Governments’ Strong Reciprocity on Agricultural Green Production Networks under Intensive Management in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, December.
    18. Yuchen Guo & Liusheng Han & Dafu Zhang & Guangwei Sun & Junfu Fan & Xiaoyu Ren, 2023. "The Factors Affecting the Quality of the Temperature Vegetation Dryness Index (TVDI) and the Spatial–Temporal Variations in Drought from 2011 to 2020 in Regions Affected by Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Qiongrui Zhang & Tao Huang & Songjun Xu, 2023. "Assessment of Urban Ecological Resilience Based on PSR Framework in the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, May.
    20. Hongjun Dai & Tao Sun & Kun Zhang & Wen Guo, 2015. "Research on Rural Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Process of Urban-Rural Integration in the Economically-Developed Area in China Based on the Improved STIRPAT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1036-:d:1143855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.