IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p371-d1015430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Agricultural Intensive Management and Its Influence on Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in China

Author

Listed:
  • Lingyan Xu

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Research Centers of Green Development and Environmental Governance, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Jing Jiang

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Mengyi Lu

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Jianguo Du

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Research Centers of Green Development and Environmental Governance, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

The influencing mechanism of agricultural non-point source pollution under intensive agricultural management is complicated. This paper adopted provincial panel data from 2008 to 2020 to estimate the level of agricultural intensive management, the agricultural chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) emissions and emission intensity of agricultural non-point source pollution in different regions of China and analyze the spatial-temporal differentiation characteristics. Moreover, the mediation effect model and spatial spillover effect model were adopted to further explore the influence mechanism of agricultural intensive management on agricultural non-point source pollution. The results show that (1) The total emissions and emission intensity of agricultural non-point source pollution both showed an increasing trend, and these areas with high levels of agricultural non-point source pollution are roughly consistent with those areas with high-level of agricultural intensive management. (2) At the overall level, there were mediating effects of natural ecology, agricultural land management, planting and rearing structure and pollution control investment between the relationship of agricultural intensive management and agricultural non-point source pollution, among which agricultural land management was the largest. Additionally, there was significant spatial heterogeneity in the influencing mechanism of agricultural intensive management on non-point source pollution. (3) There were significant spatial agglomeration characteristics in both agricultural intensive management and agricultural non-point source pollution, which showed a fluctuating trend of “rise-decline-rise-decline”. (4) Agricultural intensive management has a significant positive spatial spillover effect on COD, TN and TP emissions of agricultural non-point source pollution. However, environmental regulation could cause agricultural non-point source pollution to be transferred nearby. Scientific understanding of the spatio-temporal differentiation characteristics and influencing mechanism of agricultural non-point source pollution under the agricultural intensive management model is conducive to providing reference for policy regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingyan Xu & Jing Jiang & Mengyi Lu & Jianguo Du, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Agricultural Intensive Management and Its Influence on Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:371-:d:1015430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/371/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/371/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Deng & Chuang Li & Liping Wang, 2022. "The Impact of Corporate Innovation on Environmental Performance: The Moderating Effect of Financing Constraints and Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Islam, N. & Vincent, J., 1999. "Unveiling the Income-Environment Relationship: An Exploration into the Determinants of Environmental Quality," Papers 701, Harvard - Institute for International Development.
    3. Liu, Jingjing & Zhao, Min & Wang, Yanbo, 2020. "Impacts of government subsidies and environmental regulations on green process innovation: A nonlinear approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Wan, Wei & Han, Yiwen & Wu, Hanqing & Liu, Fan & Liu, Zhong, 2021. "Application of the source–sink landscape method in the evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution: First estimation of an orchard-dominated area in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    5. Azeb W. Degife & Florian Zabel & Wolfram Mauser, 2019. "Land Use Scenarios and Their Effect on Potential Crop Production: The Case of Gambella Region, Ethiopia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Ni, Xiaojing & Parajuli, Prem B., 2018. "Evaluation of the impacts of BMPs and tailwater recovery system on surface and groundwater using satellite imagery and SWAT reservoir function," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 78-87.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ran Zhou & Lu Huang & Ke Wang & Wenhao Hu, 2023. "From Productive Landscape to Agritouristic Landscape? The Evidence of an Agricultural Heritage System—Zhejiang Huzhou Mulberry-Dyke and Fish-Pond System," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuekai Chen & Guojian He & Xiaobo Liu & Bogen Li & Wenqi Peng & Fei Dong & Aiping Huang & Weijie Wang & Qiuyue Lian, 2021. "Sub-Watershed Parameter Transplantation Method for Non-Point Source Pollution Estimation in Complex Underlying Surface Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Nasreen, Samia & Anwar, Sofia & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2017. "Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian economies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1105-1122.
    3. Yousaf, Umair Bin & Ullah, Irfan & Jiang, Junchen & Wang, Man, 2022. "The role of board capital in driving green innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    4. Xiaojing Ni & Prem B. Parajuli & Ying Ouyang, 2020. "Assessing Agriculture Conservation Practice Impacts on Groundwater Levels at Watershed Scale," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(4), pages 1553-1566, March.
    5. Liu, Changyu & Song, Yadong & Wang, Wei & Shi, Xunpeng, 2023. "The governance of manufacturers’ greenwashing behaviors: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    6. Zhice Cheng & Xinyuan Chen & Huwei Wen, 2022. "How Does Environmental Protection Tax Affect Corporate Environmental Investment? Evidence from Chinese Listed Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Zhao, Shikuan & Abbassi, Wajih & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Zhang, Han, 2024. "How do government R&D subsidies affect corporate green innovation choices? Perspectives from strategic and substantive innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1378-1396.
    8. Wang, Weilong & Xiao, Deheng & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The cost of pollution in the digital era: Impediments of air pollution on enterprise digital transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Zhongju Liao & Xiang Zhu, 2022. "A configurational analysis of firms' environmental innovation: Evidence from China's key pollutant‐discharge listed companies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1511-1522, December.
    11. Ruzhi Xu & Tingting Guo & Huawei Zhao, 2022. "Research on the Path of Policy Financing Guarantee to Promote SMEs’ Green Technology Innovation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Du, Xiuying & Xie, Zixiong, 2020. "Occurrence of turning point on environmental Kuznets curve in the process of (de)industrialization," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 359-369.
    13. Di Vita, Giuseppe, 2009. "Legal families and environmental protection: Is there a causal relationship?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 694-707, September.
    14. Shokoohi, Zeinab & Dehbidi, Navid Kargar & Tarazkar, Mohammad Hassan, 2022. "Energy intensity, economic growth and environmental quality in populous Middle East countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    15. Huang, Hongyun & Wang, Fengrong & Song, Malin & Balezentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2021. "Green innovations for sustainable development of China: Analysis based on the nested spatial panel models," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Hu, Wenfa & He, Xinhua, 2024. "The role of fiscal policies in supporting a transition to a low-carbon economy: Evidence from the Chinese shipping industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Cuma Bozkurt & Yusuf Akan, 2014. "Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions and Energy Consumption: The Turkish Case," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 4(3), pages 484-494.
    18. Jiarong Shi & Zihao Jiang & Biao Luo, 2022. "Economic policy, regulatory policy, or soft policy: Which category of policy can effectively improve the green innovation of Chinese wind power industry?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2284-2298, September.
    19. Theodore Panayotou, 2000. "Economic Growth and the Environment," CID Working Papers 56A, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    20. Atwi, Majed & Barberán, Ramón & Mur, Jesús & Angulo, Ana, 2018. "CO2 Kuznets Curve Revisited: From Cross-Sections to Panel Data Models," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 40, pages 169-196.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:371-:d:1015430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.