IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i1p207-d1035712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Design of Agricultural Mobile Robot Suspension System Based on NSGA-III and TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • Zhanghao Qu

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Peng Zhang

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Yaohua Hu

    (College of Optical, Mechanical, and Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Huanbo Yang

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Taifeng Guo

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Kaili Zhang

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Junchang Zhang

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

Abstract

The stability of vehicles is influenced by the suspension system. At present, there are many studies on the suspension of traditional passenger vehicles, but few are related to agricultural mobile robots. There are structural differences between the suspension system of agricultural mobile robots and passenger vehicles, which requires structural simplification and modelling concerning suspension of agricultural mobile robots. This study investigates the optimal design for an agricultural mobile robot’s suspension system designed based on a double wishbone suspension structure. The dynamics of the quarter suspension system were modelled based on Lagrange’s equation. In our work, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III (NSGA-III) was selected for conducting multi-objective optimization of the suspension design, combined with the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to choose the optimal combination of parameters in the non-dominated solution set obtained by NSGA-III. We compared the performance of NSGA-III with that of other multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs). Compared with the second-scoring solution, the score of the optimal solution obtained by NSGA-III increased by 4.92%, indicating that NSGA-III has a significant advantage in terms of the solution quality and robustness for the optimal design of the suspension system. This was verified by simulation in Adams that our method, which utilizes multibody dynamics, NSGA-III and TOPSIS, is feasible to determine the optimal design of a suspension system for an agricultural mobile robot.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhanghao Qu & Peng Zhang & Yaohua Hu & Huanbo Yang & Taifeng Guo & Kaili Zhang & Junchang Zhang, 2023. "Optimal Design of Agricultural Mobile Robot Suspension System Based on NSGA-III and TOPSIS," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:207-:d:1035712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/1/207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/1/207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Shiying & Xu, Jun & Gao, Haonan & Tao, Tao & Mei, Xuesong, 2020. "Safety probability based multi-objective optimization of energy-harvesting suspension system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    2. Hugh Everett, 1963. "Generalized Lagrange Multiplier Method for Solving Problems of Optimum Allocation of Resources," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 399-417, June.
    3. Xiangwang Chen & Yuan Yao & Longjiang Shen & Xiaoxia Zhang, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization of high-speed train suspension parameters for improving hunting stability," International Journal of Rail Transportation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 159-176, March.
    4. Issa, Mohamed & Samn, Anas, 2022. "Passive vehicle suspension system optimization using Harris Hawk Optimization algorithm," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 328-345.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei Zhang & Yang Liu & Jianneng Chen & Heng Zhou & Yunsheng Jiang & Junhua Tong & Lianlian Wu, 2023. "Trajectory Synthesis and Optimization Design of an Unmanned Five-Bar Vegetable Factory Packing Machine Based on NSGA-II and Grey Relation Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Vadim Bolshev & Vladimir Panchenko & Alexey Sibirev, 2023. "Engineering Innovations in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-4, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rolf H. Möhring & Andreas S. Schulz & Frederik Stork & Marc Uetz, 2003. "Solving Project Scheduling Problems by Minimum Cut Computations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 330-350, March.
    2. Mustafa Doğru & A. Kok & G. Houtum, 2013. "Newsvendor characterizations for one-warehouse multi-retailer inventory systems with discrete demand under the balance assumption," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(3), pages 541-559, September.
    3. D. Babusiaux, 1988. "Financing investment and calculations of profitability [Financement des investissements et calculs de rentabilité]," Working Papers hal-01534450, HAL.
    4. Koushik Ramakrishna & Moosa Sharafali & Yun Lim, 2015. "A two-item two-warehouse periodic review inventory model with transshipment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 365-381, October.
    5. Thanh Luong & Frederic H. Murphy & Reginald Sanders & Susan H. Holte & Peter Whitman, 1998. "Modeling the Impacts of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Gebbran, Daniel & Mhanna, Sleiman & Ma, Yiju & Chapman, Archie C. & Verbič, Gregor, 2021. "Fair coordination of distributed energy resources with Volt-Var control and PV curtailment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    7. Richárd Molnár-Szipai & Anita Varga, 2019. "Integrating combinatorial algorithms into a linear programming solver," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(2), pages 475-482, June.
    8. Steiner, Erich & McKinnon, Ken, 2000. "Dynamic programming using the Fritz-John conditions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 145-153, May.
    9. Daniel Adelman & Adam J. Mersereau, 2008. "Relaxations of Weakly Coupled Stochastic Dynamic Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 712-727, June.
    10. Zhang, Zijun & Kusiak, Andrew & Zeng, Yaohui & Wei, Xiupeng, 2016. "Modeling and optimization of a wastewater pumping system with data-mining methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 303-311.
    11. Moehring, Rolf & Uetz, Marc & Stork, Frederik & Schulz, Andreas S., 2002. "Solving Project Scheduling Problems by Minimum Cut," Working papers 4231-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    12. C ReVelle & D J Elzinga, 1989. "An Algorithm for Facility Location in a Districted Region," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 16(1), pages 41-50, March.
    13. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "A survey on the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 1-46, February.
    14. Monique Guignard, 2003. "Lagrangean relaxation," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 11(2), pages 151-200, December.
    15. Igor Litvinchev & Socorro Rangel & Jania Saucedo, 2010. "A Lagrangian bound for many-to-many assignment problems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 241-257, April.
    16. Dimitris Bertsimas & Sarah Stock Patterson, 2000. "The Traffic Flow Management Rerouting Problem in Air Traffic Control: A Dynamic Network Flow Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 239-255, August.
    17. Ardjmand, Ehsan & Shakeri, Heman & Singh, Manjeet & Sanei Bajgiran, Omid, 2018. "Minimizing order picking makespan with multiple pickers in a wave picking warehouse," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 169-183.
    18. Freville, Arnaud, 2004. "The multidimensional 0-1 knapsack problem: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Alain Bonnafous & Pablo Jensen & William Roy, 2006. "Le cofinancement usager - contribuable et le partenariat public-privé changent les termes de l'évaluation des programmes d'investissement public," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(4), pages 15-30.
    20. Yoon, Yourim & Kim, Yong-Hyuk & Moon, Byung-Ro, 2012. "A theoretical and empirical investigation on the Lagrangian capacities of the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 366-376.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:207-:d:1035712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.