IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i7p967-d856333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Stand Density and N Fertilization on the Performance of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Intercropped with Climbing Beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Villwock

    (Institute for Applied Agricultural Research, Nürtingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622 Nürtingen, Germany)

  • Sabine Kurz

    (Institute for Applied Agricultural Research, Nürtingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622 Nürtingen, Germany)

  • Jens Hartung

    (Institute of Crop Science, Biostatistics, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Maria Müller-Lindenlauf

    (Institute for Applied Agricultural Research, Nürtingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622 Nürtingen, Germany)

Abstract

Maize is Germany’s most important fodder and energy crop. However, pure maize cultivation has ecological disadvantages. Moreover, its yield is low in crude protein, an important feed quality parameter. Maize–bean intercropping can potentially address both issues. A bean variety specially developed for intercropping was first introduced in 2016. Using this variety, a network of institutions conducted 13 field trials from 2017 to 2020 on four sites in Germany. We sought to determine the effects of stand density and nitrogen (N) fertilization on dry matter yield, crude protein yield, and soil mineral N content (N min ) at harvest of intercropped vs. pure maize. The three intercropping bean densities we tested (7.5, 5.5, and 4 plants/m 2 ) produced non-significantly different yields of dry matter or crude protein, given a maize density of 7.5–8 plants/m 2 . Intercropping was inferior to pure maize in dry matter yield, but non-significantly different in crude protein yield. Under neither cropping strategy were significant losses in dry matter or crude protein yield recorded with reduced compared to full N fertilization. At full fertilization, however, both pure maize systems and the 8/4 maize–bean intercrop system left significantly higher N min at harvest than the other variants of the corresponding system or N fertilization level and thus an increased risk of nitrate leaching. We encourage further optimization of yield performance in maize–bean intercropping, e.g., through breeding or promotion of biological N fixation via rhizobia inoculation. Furthermore, we recommend reducing N fertilization levels in maize cultivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Villwock & Sabine Kurz & Jens Hartung & Maria Müller-Lindenlauf, 2022. "Effects of Stand Density and N Fertilization on the Performance of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Intercropped with Climbing Beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:967-:d:856333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/967/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/967/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabine Andert, 2021. "The Method and Timing of Weed Control Affect the Productivity of Intercropped Maize ( Zea mays L.) and Bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Liina Nurk & Rüdiger Graß & Carola Pekrun & Michael Wachendorf, 2017. "Effect of Sowing Method and Weed Control on the Performance of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Intercropped with Climbing Beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Eliakira Kisetu Nassary & Frederick Baijukya & Patrick Alois Ndakidemi, 2020. "Assessing the Productivity of Common Bean in Intercrop with Maize across Agro-Ecological Zones of Smallholder Farms in the Northern Highlands of Tanzania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Rybacki & Przemysław Przygodziński & Andrzej Osuch & Andrzej Blecharczyk & Ryszard Walkowiak & Ewa Osuch & Ireneusz Kowalik, 2021. "The Technology of Precise Application of Herbicides in Onion Field Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Conrad Baker & Albert Thembinkosi Modi & Adornis D. Nciizah, 2021. "Weeding Frequency Effects on Growth and Yield of Dry Bean Intercropped with Sweet Sorghum and Cowpea under a Dryland Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Vanessa S. Schulz & Caroline Schumann & Sebastian Weisenburger & Maria Müller-Lindenlauf & Kerstin Stolzenburg & Kurt Möller, 2020. "Row-Intercropping Maize ( Zea mays L.) with Biodiversity-Enhancing Flowering-Partners—Effect on Plant Growth, Silage Yield, and Composition of Harvest Material," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Sabine Andert, 2021. "The Method and Timing of Weed Control Affect the Productivity of Intercropped Maize ( Zea mays L.) and Bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:967-:d:856333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.