IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v7y2017i7p51-d102353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Sowing Method and Weed Control on the Performance of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Intercropped with Climbing Beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Author

Listed:
  • Liina Nurk

    (Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Grassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources, University of Kassel, Steinstraße 19, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany)

  • Rüdiger Graß

    (Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Grassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources, University of Kassel, Steinstraße 19, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany)

  • Carola Pekrun

    (Agronomy and Quality Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622 Nuertingen, Germany)

  • Michael Wachendorf

    (Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Grassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources, University of Kassel, Steinstraße 19, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany)

Abstract

Maize is grown on a large area in Germany and there is a growing concern in society about negative environmental effects related to this. The objective of the study was to test the performance of mixtures of maize and climbing beans as an alternative to monocropped maize under different site and management conditions. The effects of sowing density of maize and beans as well as the sowing time of beans on total dry matter (DM) yield and bean DM contribution to the total yield were investigated. Further, various mechanical and chemical weed control methods were tested and the resulting total DM yield was compared with that of a reference treatment (manual weeding). Hardly any consistent yield difference between maize/bean mixtures and monocropped maize occurred. The proportion of beans varied over a wide range among sites and was consistently higher when beans were sown at an early growth stage of maize. Mixtures did not suppress weeds efficiently and at two of the three sites their yield clearly declined with increasing weed coverage in the mixtures. A weed coverage of up to circa 10% may be tolerated, as the corresponding yield reduction is less than 1 t ha −1 . Considering the additional effort (i.e., two sowings, high costs for bean seeds, complicated weed control) in managing such mixtures, it can be concluded that maize/bean mixtures can currently hardly be recommended as an alternative to monocropped maize for feedstock production.

Suggested Citation

  • Liina Nurk & Rüdiger Graß & Carola Pekrun & Michael Wachendorf, 2017. "Effect of Sowing Method and Weed Control on the Performance of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Intercropped with Climbing Beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:7:y:2017:i:7:p:51-:d:102353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/7/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/7/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vanessa S. Schulz & Caroline Schumann & Sebastian Weisenburger & Maria Müller-Lindenlauf & Kerstin Stolzenburg & Kurt Möller, 2020. "Row-Intercropping Maize ( Zea mays L.) with Biodiversity-Enhancing Flowering-Partners—Effect on Plant Growth, Silage Yield, and Composition of Harvest Material," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Sabine Andert, 2021. "The Method and Timing of Weed Control Affect the Productivity of Intercropped Maize ( Zea mays L.) and Bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Daniel Villwock & Sabine Kurz & Jens Hartung & Maria Müller-Lindenlauf, 2022. "Effects of Stand Density and N Fertilization on the Performance of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Intercropped with Climbing Beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:7:y:2017:i:7:p:51-:d:102353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.