IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i10p957-d648940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Field Capacity and Harvest Efficiency Evaluation of Traditional Small Box and Semi-Automated Bin Handling Systems for Wild Blueberries

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad H. Khan

    (Department of Business and Social Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada)

  • Emmanuel K. Yiridoe

    (Department of Business and Social Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada)

  • Travis J. Esau

    (Department of Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada)

  • Aitazaz A. Farooque

    (Faculty of Sustainable Design Engineering, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada)

  • Qamar U. Zaman

    (Department of Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada)

  • Prosper J. Koto

    (Research Methods Unit, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS B3H 2E2, Canada)

  • Craig B. MacEachern

    (Department of Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada)

Abstract

Mechanical harvesters with small box and semi-automated bin handling systems are increasingly being used for harvesting wild blueberries in Eastern Canada, and Northeastern, USA. However, their field capacity and performance have not been quantified and compared. Important measures of field capacity and efficiency for a traditional mechanical harvester were compared with a novel semi-automatic bin handling harvester. Data were obtained from on-farm field trials conducted at four sites in Nova Scotia, Canada in 2017 and 2018. Both harvesters had double head configurations, along with other similar engineering configurations: (i) 0.66 m picking reels; (ii) 16 picker bars per head and 65 teeth per bar; (iii) 1.72 m picking width; (iv) 21 rpm head speed; and (v) 0.31 ms −1 ground speed. Each harvester was operated for 120 min and data such as berry harvesting time and box handling time were recorded, with six replications during each year. Statistical methods were used to compare the harvest efficiency of the two mechanical harvesters. Harvest time efficiency was significantly higher for the semi-automatic bin handling technology than for the small box handling technology both in 2017 ( p < 0.001), and 2018 ( p < 0.001). Weed coverage did not have a significant effect of harvest time in either 2017 ( p = 0.694) or 2018 ( p = 0.765), though it did significantly affect yield in both 2017 ( p = 0.011) and 2018 ( p = 0.045). The findings provide useful insights for decision-makers contemplating the choice of harvesting technology to sustain profits from wild blueberry production.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad H. Khan & Emmanuel K. Yiridoe & Travis J. Esau & Aitazaz A. Farooque & Qamar U. Zaman & Prosper J. Koto & Craig B. MacEachern, 2021. "Field Capacity and Harvest Efficiency Evaluation of Traditional Small Box and Semi-Automated Bin Handling Systems for Wild Blueberries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:957-:d:648940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/957/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/957/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Schmitz & David Seckler, 1970. "Mechanized Agriculture and Social Welfare: The Case of the Tomato Harvester," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 52(4), pages 569-577.
    2. J. Edward Taylor & Diane Charlton & Antonio Yúnez-Naude, 2012. "The End of Farm Labor Abundance," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(4), pages 587-598.
    3. Khan, Ahmad H. & Yiridoe, Emmanuel K. & Esau, Travis J. & Koto, Prosper S. & Zaman, Qamar U. & Farooque, Aitazaz A., 2020. "Economic Comparison of Traditional Small Box and Semi-Automatic Bin Handling HarvestingTechnologies for Wild Blueberries from a Field Trial: A Stochastic Approach," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 38(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hodge, Ian D., 1983. "Rural Employment and the Quality of Life," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(03), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Rausser, Gordon C. & de Janvry, Alain & Schmitz, Andrew & Zilberman, David D., 1980. "Principal issues in the evaluation of public research in agriculture," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt74v9m7dh, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    3. Vernon Ruttan, 1980. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 529-547, January.
    4. Cooke, Stephen C., 1990. "The Role Of Value Added In Benefit/Cost Analysis," A.E. Research Series 140522, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    5. Diane Charlton, 2022. "Seasonal farm labor and COVID‐19 spread," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1591-1609, September.
    6. Pardey, Philip G. & Alston, Julian M. & Ruttan, Vernon W., 2010. "The Economics of Innovation and Technical Change in Agriculture," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 939-984, Elsevier.
    7. Reimund, Donn A. & Moore, Charles V. & Martin, J. Rod, 1977. "Factors Affecting Structural Change In Agricultural Subsectors: Implications For Research," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, July.
    8. Huffman, Wallace E., 2012. "The Status of Labor-Saving Mechanization in U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Harvesting," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-7.
    9. Grace Melo & Gregory Colson & Octavio A. Ramirez, 2014. "Hispanic American Opinions toward Immigration and Immigration Policy Reform Proposals," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 36(4), pages 604-622.
    10. Huffman, Wallace E., 2008. "Rising Food and Energy Prices: Projections for Labor Markets 2008-18 and Beyond," Working Papers 44874, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Peterson, Willis L. & Hayami, Yujiro, 1977. "Technical Change in Agriculture," A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Volume 1: Traditional Fields of Agricultural Economics 1940s to 1970s,, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Roka, Fritz m. & Simnitt, Skyler & Farnsworth, Derek, 2016. "Pre-employment costs associated with H-2A agricultural workers and the effects of the ‘60-minute rule’," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(3), December.
    13. Huffman, Wallace E., 2010. "The status of labor-saving mechanization in fruits and vegetables," ISU General Staff Papers 201006220700001125, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    14. Norton, George W. & Davis, Jeffrey S., 1979. "Review Of Methods Used To Evaluate Returns To Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13520, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    15. Ager, Philipp & Goñi, Marc & Salvanes, Kjell Gunnar, 2023. "Gender-biased technological change: Milking machines and the exodus of women from farming," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 16/2023, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    16. Wallace E. Huffman, 2005. "Trends, Adjustments, and Demographics, and Income of Agricultural Workers," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(3), pages 351-360.
    17. Ahearn, Mary Clare & Yee, Jet & Huffman, Wallace E., 2002. "The Impact Of Government Policies On Agricultural Productivity And Structure: Preliminary Results," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19865, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Diane Charlton & Genti Kostandini, 2021. "Can Technology Compensate for a Labor Shortage? Effects of 287(g) Immigration Policies on the U.S. Dairy Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(1), pages 70-89, January.
    19. Swinnen, Johan F. M. & Gorter, Harry de & Rausser, Gordon C. & Banerjee, Anurag N., 2000. "The political economy of public research investment and commodity policies in agriculture: an empirical study," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 111-122, March.
    20. Peterson, Willis L. & Kislev, Yoav, 1981. "The Cotton Harvester In Retrospect: Labor Displacement Or Replacement?," Staff Papers 13839, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:957-:d:648940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.