IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i7p277-d381620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corn Grain Yield Estimation from Vegetation Indices, Canopy Cover, Plant Density, and a Neural Network Using Multispectral and RGB Images Acquired with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Héctor García-Martínez

    (Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco Km. 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico)

  • Héctor Flores-Magdaleno

    (Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco Km. 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico)

  • Roberto Ascencio-Hernández

    (Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco Km. 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico)

  • Abdul Khalil-Gardezi

    (Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco Km. 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico)

  • Leonardo Tijerina-Chávez

    (Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco Km. 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico)

  • Oscar R. Mancilla-Villa

    (Centro Universitario de la Costa Sur, Universidad de Guadalajara, Avenida Independencia Nacional 151, Autlán C.P. 48900, Jalisco, Mexico)

  • Mario A. Vázquez-Peña

    (Departamento de Irrigación, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Carretera México-Texcoco, km 38.5, Chapingo C.P. 56230, Mexico)

Abstract

Corn yields vary spatially and temporally in the plots as a result of weather, altitude, variety, plant density, available water, nutrients, and planting date; these are the main factors that influence crop yield. In this study, different multispectral and red-green-blue (RGB) vegetation indices were analyzed, as well as the digitally estimated canopy cover and plant density, in order to estimate corn grain yield using a neural network model. The relative importance of the predictor variables was also analyzed. An experiment was established with five levels of nitrogen fertilization (140, 200, 260, 320, and 380 kg/ha) and four replicates, in a completely randomized block design, resulting in 20 experimental polygons. Crop information was captured using two sensors (Parrot Sequoia_4.9, and DJI FC6310_8.8) mounted on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for two flight dates at 47 and 79 days after sowing (DAS). The correlation coefficient between the plant density, obtained through the digital count of corn plants, and the corn grain yield was 0.94; this variable was the one with the highest relative importance in the yield estimation according to Garson’s algorithm. The canopy cover, digitally estimated, showed a correlation coefficient of 0.77 with respect to the corn grain yield, while the relative importance of this variable in the yield estimation was 0.080 and 0.093 for 47 and 79 DAS, respectively. The wide dynamic range vegetation index (WDRVI), plant density, and canopy cover showed the highest correlation coefficient and the smallest errors (R = 0.99, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.028 t ha −1 , root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.125 t ha −1 ) in the corn grain yield estimation at 47 DAS, with the WDRVI index and the density being the variables with the highest relative importance for this crop development date. For the 79 DAS flight, the combination of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalized difference red edge (NDRE), WDRVI, excess green (EXG), triangular greenness index (TGI), and visible atmospherically resistant index (VARI), as well as plant density and canopy cover, generated the highest correlation coefficient and the smallest errors (R = 0.97, MAE = 0.249 t ha −1 , RMSE = 0.425 t ha −1 ) in the corn grain yield estimation, where the density and the NDVI were the variables with the highest relative importance, with values of 0.295 and 0.184, respectively. However, the WDRVI, plant density, and canopy cover estimated the corn grain yield with acceptable precision (R = 0.96, MAE = 0.209 t ha −1 , RMSE = 0.449 t ha −1 ). The generated neural network models provided a high correlation coefficient between the estimated and the observed corn grain yield, and also showed acceptable errors in the yield estimation. The spectral information registered through remote sensors mounted on unmanned aerial vehicles and its processing in vegetation indices, canopy cover, and plant density allowed the characterization and estimation of corn grain yield. Such information is very useful for decision-making and agricultural activities planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Héctor García-Martínez & Héctor Flores-Magdaleno & Roberto Ascencio-Hernández & Abdul Khalil-Gardezi & Leonardo Tijerina-Chávez & Oscar R. Mancilla-Villa & Mario A. Vázquez-Peña, 2020. "Corn Grain Yield Estimation from Vegetation Indices, Canopy Cover, Plant Density, and a Neural Network Using Multispectral and RGB Images Acquired with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:7:p:277-:d:381620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/7/277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/7/277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saeed Khaki & Lizhi Wang, 2020. "Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Hui Yang & Robin Qiu & Weiwei Chen (ed.), Smart Service Systems, Operations Management, and Analytics, pages 139-147, Springer.
    2. Jig Han Jeong & Jonathan P Resop & Nathaniel D Mueller & David H Fleisher & Kyungdahm Yun & Ethan E Butler & Dennis J Timlin & Kyo-Moon Shim & James S Gerber & Vangimalla R Reddy & Soo-Hyung Kim, 2016. "Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Waheed, T. & Bonnell, R.B. & Prasher, S.O. & Paulet, E., 2006. "Measuring performance in precision agriculture: CART--A decision tree approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(1-2), pages 173-185, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lili Jiang & Yunfei Wang & Chong Wu & Haibin Wu, 2024. "Fruit Distribution Density Estimation in YOLO-Detected Strawberry Images: A Kernel Density and Nearest Neighbor Analysis Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Sebastian Kujawa & Gniewko Niedbała, 2021. "Artificial Neural Networks in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-6, May.
    3. Flavio Borfecchia & Paola Crinò & Angelo Correnti & Anna Farneti & Luigi De Cecco & Domenica Masci & Luciano Blasi & Domenico Iantosca & Vito Pignatelli & Carla Micheli, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of Water Salinization Stress on Biomass Yield of Cardoon Bio-Energetic Crops through Remote Sensing Techniques," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Romeu Gerardo & Isabel P. de Lima, 2023. "Applying RGB-Based Vegetation Indices Obtained from UAS Imagery for Monitoring the Rice Crop at the Field Scale: A Case Study in Portugal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Emerson Rodolfo Abraham & João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis & Oduvaldo Vendrametto & Pedro Luiz de Oliveira Costa Neto & Rodrigo Carlo Toloi & Aguinaldo Eduardo de Souza & Marcos de Oliveira Morais, 2020. "Time Series Prediction with Artificial Neural Networks: An Analysis Using Brazilian Soybean Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Hyeongjun Lim & Sojung Kim, 2024. "Applications of Machine Learning Technologies for Feedstock Yield Estimation of Ethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Dejan Ranković & Goran Todorović & Marijenka Tabaković & Slaven Prodanović & Jan Boćanski & Nenad Delić, 2021. "Direct and Joint Effects of Genotype, Defoliation and Crop Density on the Yield of Three Inbred Maize Lines," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Pompilica Iagăru & Pompiliu Pavel & Romulus Iagăru & Anca Șipoș, 2022. "Aerial Monitorization—A Vector for Ensuring the Agroecosystems Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    9. Yu Wang & Zhongfa Zhou & Denghong Huang & Tian Zhang & Wenhui Zhang, 2022. "Identifying and Counting Tobacco Plants in Fragmented Terrains Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images in Beipanjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Mohammad Fatin Fatihur Rahman & Shurui Fan & Yan Zhang & Lei Chen, 2021. "A Comparative Study on Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silva, J.F. & Santos, J.L. & Ribeiro, P.F. & Marta-Pedroso, C. & Magalhães, M.R. & Moreira, F., 2024. "A farming systems approach to assess synergies and trade-offs among ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Ahmed, Moiz Uddin & Hussain, Iqbal, 2022. "Prediction of Wheat Production Using Machine Learning Algorithms in northern areas of Pakistan," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6).
    3. Schmidt, Lorenz & Odening, Martin & Schlanstein, Johann & Ritter, Matthias, 2022. "Exploring the weather-yield nexus with artificial neural networks," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Indy Man Kit Ho & Anthony Weldon & Jason Tze Ho Yong & Candy Tze Tim Lam & Jaime Sampaio, 2023. "Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Pool Data from Meta-Analysis for the Prediction of Countermovement Jump Improvement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Helder Fraga & Teresa R. Freitas & Marco Moriondo & Daniel Molitor & João A. Santos, 2024. "Determining the Climatic Drivers for Wine Production in the Côa Region (Portugal) Using a Machine Learning Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Florian Schierhorn & Max Hofmann & Taras Gagalyuk & Igor Ostapchuk & Daniel Müller, 2021. "Machine learning reveals complex effects of climatic means and weather extremes on wheat yields during different plant developmental stages," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1-19, December.
    7. João Paulo Delapasse Simioni & Laurindo Antonio Guasselli & Victor Fernandez Nascimento & Luis Fernando Chimelo Ruiz & Tassia Fraga Belloli, 2020. "Integration of multi-sensor analysis and decision tree for evaluation of dual and quad-Pol SAR in L- and C-bands applied for marsh delineation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5603-5620, August.
    8. Devkota, Mina & Yigezu, Yigezu Atnafe, 2020. "Explaining yield and gross margin gaps for sustainable intensification of the wheat-based systems in a Mediterranean climate," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. Puyu Feng & Bin Wang & De Li Liu & Hongtao Xing & Fei Ji & Ian Macadam & Hongyan Ruan & Qiang Yu, 2018. "Impacts of rainfall extremes on wheat yield in semi-arid cropping systems in eastern Australia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 555-569, April.
    10. Shine, P. & Scully, T. & Upton, J. & Murphy, M.D., 2019. "Annual electricity consumption prediction and future expansion analysis on dairy farms using a support vector machine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1110-1119.
    11. Li Fan & Shibo Fang & Jinlong Fan & Yan Wang & Linqing Zhan & Yongkun He, 2024. "Rice Yield Estimation Using Machine Learning and Feature Selection in Hilly and Mountainous Chongqing, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Martin Kuradusenge & Eric Hitimana & Damien Hanyurwimfura & Placide Rukundo & Kambombo Mtonga & Angelique Mukasine & Claudette Uwitonze & Jackson Ngabonziza & Angelique Uwamahoro, 2023. "Crop Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Case of Irish Potato and Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Barlin O. Olivares & Andrés Vega & María A. Rueda Calderón & Edilberto Montenegro-Gracia & Miguel Araya-Almán & Edgloris Marys, 2022. "Prediction of Banana Production Using Epidemiological Parameters of Black Sigatoka: An Application with Random Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Banda, Enid & Rafiei, Vahid & Kpodo, Josué & Nejadhashemi, A. Pouyan & Singh, Gurjeet & Das, Narendra N. & Kc, Rabin & Diallo, Amadiane, 2024. "Millet yield estimations in Senegal: Unveiling the power of regional water stress analysis and advanced predictive modeling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    15. Keach Murakami & Seiji Shimoda & Yasuhiro Kominami & Manabu Nemoto & Satoshi Inoue, 2021. "Prediction of municipality-level winter wheat yield based on meteorological data using machine learning in Hokkaido, Japan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Xu Zhang & Guangsheng Chen & Lingxiao Cai & Hongbo Jiao & Jianwen Hua & Xifang Luo & Xinliang Wei, 2021. "Impact Assessments of Typhoon Lekima on Forest Damages in Subtropical China Using Machine Learning Methods and Landsat 8 OLI Imagery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Schmidt, Lorenz & Odening, Martin & Schlanstein, Johann & Ritter, Matthias, 2021. "Estimation of the Farm-Level Yield-Weather-Relation Using Machine Learning," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317075, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    18. Timsina, Jagadish & Dutta, Sudarshan & Devkota, Krishna Prasad & Chakraborty, Somsubhra & Neupane, Ram Krishna & Bishta, Sudarshan & Amgain, Lal Prasad & Singh, Vinod K. & Islam, Saiful & Majumdar, Ka, 2021. "Improved nutrient management in cereals using Nutrient Expert and machine learning tools: Productivity, profitability and nutrient use efficiency," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    19. Jaturong Som-ard & Savittri Ratanopad Suwanlee & Dusadee Pinasu & Surasak Keawsomsee & Kemin Kasa & Nattawut Seesanhao & Sarawut Ninsawat & Enrico Borgogno-Mondino & Filippo Sarvia, 2024. "Evaluating Sugarcane Yield Estimation in Thailand Using Multi-Temporal Sentinel-2 and Landsat Data Together with Machine-Learning Algorithms," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Li, Siyi & Wang, Bin & Feng, Puyu & Liu, De Li & Li, Linchao & Shi, Lijie & Yu, Qiang, 2022. "Assessing climate vulnerability of historical wheat yield in south-eastern Australia's wheat belt," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:7:p:277-:d:381620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.