IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i6p509-d566223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct and Joint Effects of Genotype, Defoliation and Crop Density on the Yield of Three Inbred Maize Lines

Author

Listed:
  • Dejan Ranković

    (Maize Research Institute, Zemun Polje, 11185 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia)

  • Goran Todorović

    (Maize Research Institute, Zemun Polje, 11185 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia)

  • Marijenka Tabaković

    (Maize Research Institute, Zemun Polje, 11185 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia)

  • Slaven Prodanović

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia)

  • Jan Boćanski

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Nenad Delić

    (Maize Research Institute, Zemun Polje, 11185 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to observe direct and joint effects of three factors (genotypes, ecological environmental conditions and the applied crop density) on the level of defoliation intensity and yield. Three inbred lines (G) of maize (G1–L217RfC, G2–L335/99 and G3–L76B004) were used in the study. The trials were performed in two years (Y) (Y1 = 2016 and Y2 = 2017) and in two locations (L) (L1 and L2) under four ecological conditions of the year–location interaction (E1–E4) and in two densities (D1 and D2) (50,000 and 65,000 plants ha −1 ). Prior to tasselling, the following five treatments of detasseling and defoliation (T) were applied: T1—control, no leaf removal only detasseling, T2–T5—removal of tassels and top leaves (from one to four top leaves). The defoliation treatments had the most pronounced effect on the yield reduction in G1 (T1–Tn+1… T5), p < 0.05. The ecological conditions on yield variability were expressed under poor weather conditions (E3 and E4), while lower densities were less favorable for the application of defoliation treatments. The result of joint effects of factors was the lowest grain yield (896 kg/ha) in G3 in the variant E3D1 for T2 and the highest grain yield (11,389 kg/ha) in G3 in the variant E2D2 for T1. The smallest effect of the defoliation treatment was on the kernel row number (KRN).

Suggested Citation

  • Dejan Ranković & Goran Todorović & Marijenka Tabaković & Slaven Prodanović & Jan Boćanski & Nenad Delić, 2021. "Direct and Joint Effects of Genotype, Defoliation and Crop Density on the Yield of Three Inbred Maize Lines," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:6:p:509-:d:566223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/6/509/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/6/509/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Héctor García-Martínez & Héctor Flores-Magdaleno & Roberto Ascencio-Hernández & Abdul Khalil-Gardezi & Leonardo Tijerina-Chávez & Oscar R. Mancilla-Villa & Mario A. Vázquez-Peña, 2020. "Corn Grain Yield Estimation from Vegetation Indices, Canopy Cover, Plant Density, and a Neural Network Using Multispectral and RGB Images Acquired with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Wang & Zhongfa Zhou & Denghong Huang & Tian Zhang & Wenhui Zhang, 2022. "Identifying and Counting Tobacco Plants in Fragmented Terrains Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images in Beipanjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Hyeongjun Lim & Sojung Kim, 2024. "Applications of Machine Learning Technologies for Feedstock Yield Estimation of Ethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Lili Jiang & Yunfei Wang & Chong Wu & Haibin Wu, 2024. "Fruit Distribution Density Estimation in YOLO-Detected Strawberry Images: A Kernel Density and Nearest Neighbor Analysis Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Sebastian Kujawa & Gniewko Niedbała, 2021. "Artificial Neural Networks in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-6, May.
    5. Pompilica Iagăru & Pompiliu Pavel & Romulus Iagăru & Anca Șipoș, 2022. "Aerial Monitorization—A Vector for Ensuring the Agroecosystems Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Mohammad Fatin Fatihur Rahman & Shurui Fan & Yan Zhang & Lei Chen, 2021. "A Comparative Study on Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, January.
    7. Emerson Rodolfo Abraham & João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis & Oduvaldo Vendrametto & Pedro Luiz de Oliveira Costa Neto & Rodrigo Carlo Toloi & Aguinaldo Eduardo de Souza & Marcos de Oliveira Morais, 2020. "Time Series Prediction with Artificial Neural Networks: An Analysis Using Brazilian Soybean Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Flavio Borfecchia & Paola Crinò & Angelo Correnti & Anna Farneti & Luigi De Cecco & Domenica Masci & Luciano Blasi & Domenico Iantosca & Vito Pignatelli & Carla Micheli, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of Water Salinization Stress on Biomass Yield of Cardoon Bio-Energetic Crops through Remote Sensing Techniques," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Romeu Gerardo & Isabel P. de Lima, 2023. "Applying RGB-Based Vegetation Indices Obtained from UAS Imagery for Monitoring the Rice Crop at the Field Scale: A Case Study in Portugal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:6:p:509-:d:566223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.