IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i4p96-d339758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Intensive Co-operated Agribusiness: A Gender-Based Comparative Borich Needs Assessment Model Analysis of Beef Cattle Farmers in Eswatini

Author

Listed:
  • Sicelo Ignatius Dlamini

    (Department of Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan)

  • Wen-Chi Huang

    (Department of Agribusiness Management, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan)

Abstract

Beef cattle farming assumes a pivotal role in economic growth, household food security, and poverty alleviation in Eswatini. However, paucity of information dissemination, and competence are drawbacks that accord a steady annual increase in beef imports and a decline in exports. Therefore, the study conducted a gender-based comparative assessment of training needs for beef cattle farmers. Primary data were collected through personal interviews, guided by a reliability-tested questionnaire, from a sample of 397 farmers. The Borich Needs Assessment Model was adopted for data analysis and inferential statistics were employed to evaluate statistically significant differences between the gender groups. On a scale of 5, farmers were found to be less proficient ( M = 1.891, SD = 0.529) in cattle production and agribusiness management practices. Female farmers were significantly less proficient than males ( t = −6.004, p = 0.000). Statistically significant differences in mean weighted discrepancy scores ( t = 5.280, p = 0.000) revealed a strong training need for females compared to men. It is recommended that dissemination of training information should be prioritized as follows: (1) agribusiness management concepts, (2) feed and feeding concepts, (3) cattle health concepts, (4) farmer-organizational concepts, (5) farm structures, and (6) breeding and rearing concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Sicelo Ignatius Dlamini & Wen-Chi Huang, 2020. "Towards Intensive Co-operated Agribusiness: A Gender-Based Comparative Borich Needs Assessment Model Analysis of Beef Cattle Farmers in Eswatini," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:96-:d:339758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/4/96/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/4/96/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Umar, Sulaiman & Man, Norsida & Nawi, Nolila Mohd & Latif, Ismail Abd. & Samah, Bahaman Abu, 2017. "Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 9-14.
    2. Graeme D. Ruxton, 2006. "The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann--Whitney U test," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(4), pages 688-690, July.
    3. T.A Masuku & M.B Masuku & J.P.B Mutangira, 2016. "Performance of Multi-Purpose Cooperatives in the Shiselweni Region of Swaziland," International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 3(4), pages 58-71.
    4. T.A. Masuku & M.B. Masuku & J.P.B. Mutangira, 2016. "Performance of Multi-Purpose Cooperatives in the Shiselweni Region of Swaziland," International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 3(4), pages 58-71.
    5. Dave Weatherspoon & Joyce Cacho & Ralph Christy, 2004. "Linking Globalization, Economic Growth and Poverty: Impacts of Agribusiness Strategies on Sub-Saharan Africa," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Ralph D Christy (ed.), Achieving Sustainable Communities In A Global Economy Alternative Private Strategies and Public Policies, chapter 2, pages 27-42, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Hao, Jinghui & Bijman, Jos & Gardebroek, Cornelis & Heerink, Nico & Heijman, Wim & Huo, Xuexi, 2018. "Cooperative membership and farmers’ choice of marketing channels – Evidence from apple farmers in Shaanxi and Shandong Provinces, China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-64.
    7. Sicelo Ignatius Dlamini & Wen-Chi Huang, 2019. "A Double Hurdle Estimation of Sales Decisions by Smallholder Beef Cattle Farmers in Eswatini," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Claire Heffernan & Louise Nielsen, 2007. "The Livestock Guru: The Design and Testing of a Tool for Knowledge Transfer among the Poor," Information Technologies and International Development, MIT Press, vol. 4(1), pages 113-121, October.
    9. Tirivayi, Nyasha & Nennen, Louise & Tesfaye, Wondimagegn & Ma, Qiang, 2018. "The benefits of collective action: Exploring the role of forest producer organizations in social protection," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 106-114.
    10. Upton, Martin, 2004. "The Role of Livestock in Economic Development and Poverty Reduction," PPLPI Working Papers 23783, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Colantoni & Nicola Lacetera & Loredana Basiricò & Massimo Malacarne & Andrea Summer & Umberto Bernabucci, 2022. "Innovative Technologies for the Feeding of Dairy Cattle to Ensure Animal Welfare and Production Quality—INNOVALAT," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-4, April.
    2. Balasubramanian, Kanchana & Mook, Anne & Kadam, Parag & Dwivedi, Puneet, 2024. "Do male and female family forest landowners have different training needs? A case study from Georgia, United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Yuanyuan Zhu & Yukuan Wang & Bin Fu & Qin Liu & Ming Li & Kun Yan, 2021. "How Are Rural Youths’ Agricultural Skills? Empirical Results and Implications in Southwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Ahado & Levan Chkhvirkia & Jiri Hejkrlik, 2022. "Is the Success of Rural Cooperatives Conditioned by the Group Characteristics and Their Value Chain? Evidence from New Farmer Groups in Georgia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 677-702, April.
    2. Kifle T. Sebhatu & Fatemeh Taheri & Tekeste Berhanu & Miet Maertens & Steven Van Passel & Marijke D'Haese, 2021. "Beyond focus: Exploring variability of service provision of agricultural cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(2), pages 207-231, June.
    3. Kang, Wenjin & Tang, Ke & Wang, Ningli, 2023. "Financialization of commodity markets ten years later," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    4. Ling Jia & Queena K. Qian & Frits Meijer & Henk Visscher, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Risk Perception: A Perspective for Proactive Risk Management in Residential Building Energy Retrofits in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Federica Di Marcantonio & Pavel Ciaian & Vicente Castellanos, 2018. "Unfair trading practices in the dairy farm sector: Evidence from selected EU regions," JRC Research Reports JRC112770, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Gerson K. Kampungu & Emma Nekayi & Dortea N. Nakandjibi & Gilbert M. Mulonda, 2024. "Running Head: Factors Affecting Market Access for Horticultural Farmers," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(4), pages 1557-1569, April.
    7. Kim Young Joo & Skibniewski Miroslaw J., 2020. "Unsuccessful bids: Coefficient of variation of bids as indicator of project risk," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2193-2199, January.
    8. Wallert, John & Ekman, Urban & Westman, Eric & Madison, Guy, 2017. "The worst performance rule with elderly in abnormal cognitive decline," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 9-17.
    9. Fakudze, Bhekiwe Delisile, 2015. "An economic evaluation of the National Red Meat Development Programme in the Eastern Cape Province, South Aftrica," Research Theses 265579, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    10. Bosire, Caroline K. & Krol, Maarten S. & Mekonnen, Mesfin M. & Ogutu, Joseph O. & de Leeuw, Jan & Lannerstad, Mats & Hoekstra, Arjen Y., 2016. "Meat and milk production scenarios and the associated land footprint in Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 64-75.
    11. Tamar Balgiashvili, 2017. "Comparing Entrepreneurial Passion of Social and Commercial Entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 45-61.
    12. Wanglin Ma & Sanghyun Hong & W. Robert Reed & Jianhua Duan & Phong Luu, 2023. "Yield effects of agricultural cooperative membership in developing countries: A meta‐analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 761-780, September.
    13. Tao Xiang & Jikun Huang & d’Artis Kancs & Scott Rozelle & Jo Swinnen, 2012. "Food Standards and Welfare: General Equilibrium Effects," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 223-244, June.
    14. Mungandi, Sepiso & Conforte, Daniel & Shadbolt, Nicola M., 2012. "Integration of Smallholders in Modern Agri-food Chains: Lessons from the KASCOL Model in Zambia," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Dave Weatherspoon & Joyce Cacho & Ralph Christy, 2004. "Linking Globalization, Economic Growth and Poverty: Impacts of Agribusiness Strategies on Sub-Saharan Africa," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Ralph D Christy (ed.), Achieving Sustainable Communities In A Global Economy Alternative Private Strategies and Public Policies, chapter 2, pages 27-42, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    16. Mhlanga, Nomathemba & Christy, Ralph D., 2006. "Capital Flows to Africa: An Analysis of the Structure of Official and Private Capital Flows," Working Papers 127057, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    17. Bernd W. Wirtz & Oliver Tuna Kurtz, 2017. "Determinants of Citizen Usage Intentions in e-Government: An Empirical Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 353-372, September.
    18. Charles Bettembourg & Christian Diot & Olivier Dameron, 2015. "Optimal Threshold Determination for Interpreting Semantic Similarity and Particularity: Application to the Comparison of Gene Sets and Metabolic Pathways Using GO and ChEBI," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, July.
    19. Thi-Hien Vu & Ke-Chung Peng & Rebecca H. Chung, 2019. "Evaluation of Environmental Efficiency of Edible Canna Production in Vietnam," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Isaías Martín-Ruiz & María-José Robles-Sánchez & Agustín Wallace, 2024. "Influence of Educational Measures on Emotional Adjustment in Students with and without Specific Learning Difficulties according to Gender," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:96-:d:339758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.