IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v8y2018i4p69-d182851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hybrid MADM Approach for the Evaluation of Different Material Handling Issues in Flexible Manufacturing Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Sandhya Dixit

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, J. C. Bose University of Science and Technology, YMCA, Faridabad 121006, India)

  • Tilak Raj

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, J. C. Bose University of Science and Technology, YMCA, Faridabad 121006, India)

Abstract

In today’s versatile and dynamic industrial scenario more and more industries are adopting advanced manufacturing technologies and systems like flexible manufacturing system (FMS) which combines the efficiency of a mass production line and the flexibility of a job shop. Material handling equipment form an important component of FMS and using proper material handling equipment can enhance the production process, provide effective utilization of manpower, increase production and improve system flexibility. In this research the main material handling issues in a FMS are identified and further evaluated using ISM and TOPSIS approaches. The purpose of identification of these issues and their analysis is to allow researchers and practicing managers to pay proper attention to these issues which may help them in designing the material handling systems in their organisations in a better way.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandhya Dixit & Tilak Raj, 2018. "A Hybrid MADM Approach for the Evaluation of Different Material Handling Issues in Flexible Manufacturing Systems," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:69-:d:182851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/8/4/69/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/8/4/69/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sujono, Sienny & Lashkari, R.S., 2007. "A multi-objective model of operation allocation and material handling system selection in FMS design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 116-133, January.
    2. Mohammad Ziaei & Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi & Mohammad Mehdi Tavakoli, 2016. "The performance improvement of water pump manufacturing system via multi-criteria decision-making and simulation (a case study: Iran Godakht Company)," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15.
    3. Péter Telek, 2013. "Equipment Preselection For Integrated Design Of Materials Handling Systems," Advanced Logistic systems, University of Miskolc, Department of Material Handling and Logistics, vol. 7(2), pages 57-66, December.
    4. Kim, Gyutai & Park, Chan S. & Yoon, K. Paul, 1997. "Identifying investment opportunities for advanced manufacturing systems with comparative-integrated performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 23-33, May.
    5. Sandhya Dixit & Tilak Raj, 2016. "Identification and modelling of the various factors affecting the productivity of FMS," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 353-379.
    6. Vineet Jain & Tilak Raj, 2015. "A hybrid approach using ISM and modified TOPSIS for the evaluation of flexibility in FMS," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 389-406.
    7. Asef-Vaziri, Ardavan & Laporte, Gilbert, 2005. "Loop based facility planning and material handling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 1-11, July.
    8. R.M. Thirupathi & S. Vinodh, 2016. "Application of interpretive structural modelling and structural equation modelling for analysis of sustainable manufacturing factors in Indian automotive component sector," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(22), pages 6661-6682, November.
    9. Swagatika Mishra & Saurav Datta & S.S. Mahapatra, 2012. "Interrelationship of drivers for agile manufacturing: an Indian experience," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 35-48.
    10. Tilak Raj & Ravi Shankar & Mohammed Suhaib, 2009. "An ISM approach to analyse interaction between barriers of transition to Flexible Manufacturing System," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 417-438.
    11. Bhaskar Nagar & Tilak Raj, 2012. "Analysis of critical success factors for implementation of humanised flexible manufacturing system in industries," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 309-329.
    12. Lai, Young-Jou & Liu, Ting-Yun & Hwang, Ching-Lai, 1994. "TOPSIS for MODM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 486-500, August.
    13. J.S. Oberoi & J.S. Khamba & Sushil & R. Kiran, 2008. "An empirical examination of advanced manufacturing technology and sourcing practices in developing manufacturing flexibilities," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(6), pages 652-671.
    14. Govindan, Kannan & Palaniappan, Murugesan & Zhu, Qinghua & Kannan, Devika, 2012. "Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 204-211.
    15. Dai, James B. & Lee, Neville K.S., 2012. "Economic feasibility analysis of flexible material handling systems: A case study in the apparel industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 28-36.
    16. Tilak Raj & Rajesh Attri & Vineet Jain, 2012. "Modelling the factors affecting flexibility in FMS," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 350-374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suman Gothwal & Tilak Raj, 2017. "Analyzing the factors affecting the flexibility in FMS using weighted interpretive structural modeling (WISM) approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 408-422, June.
    2. Jain, Vineet & Raj, Tilak, 2016. "Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 84-96.
    3. Mukisa, Nicholas & Zamora, Ramon & Lie, Tek Tjing, 2020. "Assessment of community sustainable livelihoods capitals for the implementation of alternative energy technologies in Uganda – Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 886-902.
    4. Mahmut MASCA, 2017. "Economic Performance Evaluation of European Union Countries by Topsis Method," North Economic Review, Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Department of Economics and Physics, vol. 1(1), pages 83-94, October.
    5. Sandhya Dixit & Suman Gothwal & Tilak Raj, 2022. "A LAPTOP methodology to evaluate the transition of CMS into FMS: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 516-534, February.
    6. Pokharel, Shaligram, 2008. "A two objective model for decision making in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 378-388, February.
    7. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    8. Mohammad Reza Salehizadeh & Mahdi Amidi Koohbijari & Hassan Nouri & Akın Taşcıkaraoğlu & Ozan Erdinç & João P. S. Catalão, 2019. "Bi-Objective Optimization Model for Optimal Placement of Thyristor-Controlled Series Compensator Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Ajay Chauhan & Swati Gupta & Sanjay Gupta, 2023. "An ISM and MICMAC Approach for Modelling the Contributors of Multibagger Stocks," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 30(4), pages 677-699, December.
    10. Sylvia Novillo-Villegas & Ricardo Ayala-Andrade & Juan Pablo Lopez-Cox & Javier Salazar-Oyaneder & Patricia Acosta-Vargas, 2022. "A Roadmap for Innovation Capacity in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Hyungjin Shin & Gyumin Lee & Jaenam Lee & Sehoon Kim & Inhong Song, 2023. "Assessment of Agricultural Drought Vulnerability with Focus on Upland Fields and Identification of Primary Management Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Almoghathawi, Yasser & Barker, Kash & Rocco, Claudio M. & Nicholson, Charles D., 2017. "A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for importance identification and ranking of network components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 142-151.
    13. Haji Vahabzadeh, Ali & Asiaei, Arash & Zailani, Suhaiza, 2015. "Reprint of “Green decision-making model in reverse logistics using FUZZY-VIKOR method”," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 334-347.
    14. Toktaş-Palut, Peral & Baylav, Ecem & Teoman, Seyhan & Altunbey, Mustafa, 2014. "The impact of barriers and benefits of e-procurement on its adoption decision: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 77-90.
    15. Agrawal, Saurabh & Singh, Rajesh K. & Murtaza, Qasim, 2016. "Outsourcing decisions in reverse logistics: Sustainable balanced scorecard and graph theoretic approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 41-53.
    16. Łatuszyńska Anna, 2014. "Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using Topsis Method For Interval Data In Research Into The Level Of Information Society Development," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 63-76, July.
    17. Prabhat Kumar & Puneet Tandon, 2019. "A paradigm for customer-driven product design approach using extended axiomatic design," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 589-603, February.
    18. Rihab Khemiri & Khaoula Elbedoui-Maktouf & Bernard Grabot & Belhassen Zouari, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for managing performance and risk in integrated procurement-production planning," Post-Print hal-01758604, HAL.
    19. Tolga Bektaş & Güneş Erdoğan & Stefan Røpke, 2011. "Formulations and Branch-and-Cut Algorithms for the Generalized Vehicle Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 299-316, August.
    20. Huiru Zhao & Nana Li, 2016. "Performance Evaluation for Sustainability of Strong Smart Grid by Using Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:69-:d:182851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.