IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v13y2022i1d10.1007_s13198-021-01224-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A LAPTOP methodology to evaluate the transition of CMS into FMS: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Sandhya Dixit

    (J.C. Bose University of Science and Technology YMCA)

  • Suman Gothwal

    (Ajay Kumar Garg Engineering College)

  • Tilak Raj

    (J.C. Bose University of Science and Technology YMCA)

Abstract

In the current scenario of competitive and highly volatile market conditions, industries relay more on flexibility than on standardization of production. Many researchers have advocated the use of Flexible Manufacturing Systems to meet the challenges of global competition. Despite the potential benefits offered by FMS, their adoption rates are relatively slow, especially in developing countries like India. The conventional manufacturing industries are still reluctant in adopting these newer techniques of manufacturing although today there is much support from government and need for adoption due to cut throat global competition. The main reason for this is the lack of enough literature showing its implementation and stepwise adoption process. There is an utmost need for a generalized procedure showing the implementation process which is suitable for any kind of traditional industry which wants to adopt FMS. In this paper, an attempt has been made to propose a generalized methodology named as ‘LAPTOP’ to evaluate the transition of a conventional manufacturing system into FMS. A case study has been presented to validate the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandhya Dixit & Suman Gothwal & Tilak Raj, 2022. "A LAPTOP methodology to evaluate the transition of CMS into FMS: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 516-534, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01224-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-021-01224-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-021-01224-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-021-01224-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anupma Yadav & S.C. Jayswal, 2018. "Modelling of flexible manufacturing system: a review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(7), pages 2464-2487, April.
    2. Chan, Felix T. S. & Jiang, Bing & Tang, Nelson K. H., 2000. "The development of intelligent decision support tools to aid the design of flexible manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 73-84, April.
    3. Sandhya Dixit & Tilak Raj, 2016. "Identification and modelling of the various factors affecting the productivity of FMS," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 353-379.
    4. Sandhya Dixit & Tilak Raj, 2019. "Quantifying the influence of FMS on the productivity of a firm," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 447-468.
    5. Suman Gothwal & Tilak Raj, 2018. "Prioritising the performance measures of FMS using multi-criteria decision making approaches," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 59-78.
    6. Chang, Shih-Chia & Yang, Chen-Lung & Cheng, Hsin-Chia & Sheu, Chwen, 2003. "Manufacturing flexibility and business strategy: An empirical study of small and medium sized firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 13-26, January.
    7. Suman Gothwal & Tilak Raj, 2019. "A comparative study of multi-criteria decision-making approaches for prioritising the manufacturing systems," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 277-299.
    8. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    9. Bernolak, Imre, 1997. "Effective measurement and successful elements of company productivity: The basis of competitiveness and world prosperity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1-2), pages 203-213, October.
    10. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    11. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman, 1993. "Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262570971, April.
    12. G.S. Dangayach & S.G. Deshmukh, 2004. "Advanced manufacturing technologies: evidences from Indian automobile companies," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(5), pages 426-433.
    13. Jyoti Prakas Majumdar & B. Murali Manohar, 2016. "Why Indian manufacturing SMEs are still reluctant in adopting total quality management," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 16-35.
    14. Robb Dixon, J., 1992. "Measuring manufacturing flexibility: An empirical investigation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 131-143, July.
    15. Vimlesh Kumar Ojha & Sandhya Dixit & Sanjeev Goyal, 2019. "An AHP-based comparison between automated and manual material handling systems in FMS environment," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(2), pages 256-277.
    16. Bhaskar Nagar & Tilak Raj, 2012. "Analysis of critical success factors for implementation of humanised flexible manufacturing system in industries," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 309-329.
    17. Vineet Jain & Tilak Raj, 2018. "Identification of performance variables which affect the FMS: a state-of-the-art review," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 470-489.
    18. Bayazit, Ozden & Karpak, Birsen, 2007. "An analytical network process-based framework for successful total quality management (TQM): An assessment of Turkish manufacturing industry readiness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 79-96, January.
    19. Suman Gothwal & Tilak Raj, 2017. "Analyzing the factors affecting the flexibility in FMS using weighted interpretive structural modeling (WISM) approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 408-422, June.
    20. Suman Gothwal & Tilak Raj, 2016. "Performance evaluation of flexible manufacturing system using digraph and matrix/GTA approach," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(3/4), pages 253-276.
    21. A.D. Sharma & G.S. Dangayach & S.C. Pathak, 2008. "Implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies: experiences of Indian manufacturing companies," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 67-85.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Kazuva & Jiquan Zhang & Zhijun Tong & Alu Si & Li Na, 2018. "The DPSIR Model for Environmental Risk Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste in Dar es Salaam City, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, August.
    2. S Taghipour & D Banjevic & A K S Jardine, 2011. "Prioritization of medical equipment for maintenance decisions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1666-1687, September.
    3. Jitendar Kumar Khatri & Bhimaraya Metri, 2016. "SWOT-AHP Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing Strategy Selection: A Case of Indian SME," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1211-1226, October.
    4. Castrogiovanni, Gary & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo & Mas-Tur, Alicia & Roig-Tierno, Norat, 2016. "Where to acquire knowledge: Adapting knowledge management to financial institutions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1812-1816.
    5. Dinulescu Ruxandra & Dobrin Cosmin, 2022. "Applying the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for classifying and prioritizing healthcare quality attributes," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 15-40, March.
    6. Ghasemi, Mostafa & Dashti, Reza, 2017. "A risk-based model for performance-based regulation of electric distribution companies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 36-44.
    7. A Ishizaka & D Balkenborg & T Kaplan, 2011. "Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 700-710, April.
    8. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    9. Debaleena Chatterjee & Protik Basu, 2023. "Classification Analysis for Brand Loyalty Determination," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(1), pages 106-120, February.
    10. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    11. Ho, William, 2008. "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 211-228, April.
    12. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Tomashevskii, I.L., 2015. "Eigenvector ranking method as a measuring tool: Formulas for errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 774-780.
    14. Karasakal, Esra & Aker, Pınar, 2017. "A multicriteria sorting approach based on data envelopment analysis for R&D project selection problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 79-92.
    15. Dong, Yucheng & Hong, Wei-Chiang & Xu, Yinfeng & Yu, Shui, 2013. "Numerical scales generated individually for analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 654-662.
    16. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Stochastic preference analysis in numerical preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 628-633.
    17. Mehmet Yüksel, 2019. "A Model Proposal for the Evaluation of Chemistry Education in the Context of Learning Environment," Asian Journal of Education and Training, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 488-494.
    18. Ahadi, Pedram & Fakhrabadi, Farbod & Pourshaghaghy, Alireza & Kowsary, Farshad, 2023. "Optimal site selection for a solar power plant in Iran via the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    19. Liu, Min & Heijman, Wim & Zhu, Xueqin & Dries, Liesbeth & Huang, Jikun, 2015. "Individual and Social Optima of Rural Land Allocation by Stakeholders: A Case Study on Eco-fragile Areas of Nothern China," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212051, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Bernasconi, Michele & Choirat, Christine & Seri, Raffaello, 2014. "Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: Theory and evidence," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 584-592.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01224-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.