IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i9p200-d1468726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Ethical Behavior Is Considered in Different Contexts: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Le Vu Lan Oanh

    (School of International Business and Marketing, University of Economics of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
    Marketing Department, Faculty of Commerce, Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam)

  • Patrizia Tettamanzi

    (School of Economics and Management, LIUC–Cattaneo University, 21053 Varese, Italy)

  • Dinh Tien Minh

    (School of International Business and Marketing, University of Economics of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam)

  • Maurizio Comoli

    (Department of Economic and Business Studies, University of Eastern Piedmont “Amedeo Avogadro”, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Kamel Mouloudj

    (Department of Commercial Sciences, University Yahia Fares of Medea, Medea 26000, Algeria)

  • Michael Murgolo

    (School of Economics and Management, LIUC–Cattaneo University, 21053 Varese, Italy)

  • Mai Dang Thu Hien

    (School of International Business and Marketing, University of Economics of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam)

Abstract

In the past, sustainable development was considered a guideline for all human activities, but the world has gradually changed. The criteria for action today must not only ensure sustainability but also meet appropriate ethical standards in diverse contexts. As a result, the topic of ethical behavior has been studied more extensively in recent studies. Accordingly, through bibliometric approaches, this study seeks to generalize the issues of ethical behavior explored in a variety of contexts from 1991 to 2022. A total of 1409 articles were found and extracted from the Web of Science using the keywords “ethical behavior” and “context”; they were then decoded using VOSviewer software (version 1.6). Three techniques, including bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and co-occurrence were conducted to identify the six most influential contexts in ethical behavior. The results demonstrate that the six most influential contexts in ethical behavior are consumption, leadership, business, organization, medical, and education. The results further revealed that leading countries such as the USA and UK have a larger number of studies on ethical behavior in many different contexts, such as organization, business, education, health, consumption, and politics. The Journal of Business Ethics leads the way in research into ethical behavior, followed by the Journal of Applied Psychology.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Vu Lan Oanh & Patrizia Tettamanzi & Dinh Tien Minh & Maurizio Comoli & Kamel Mouloudj & Michael Murgolo & Mai Dang Thu Hien, 2024. "How Ethical Behavior Is Considered in Different Contexts: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-38, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:200-:d:1468726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/9/200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/9/200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott J. Vitell & Robert Allen King & Katharine Howie & Jean-François Toti & Lumina Albert & Encarnación Ramos Hidalgo & Omneya Yacout, 2016. "Spirituality, Moral Identity, and Consumer Ethics: A Multi-cultural Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 147-160, November.
    2. Mohammad Daradkeh, 2023. "Navigating the Complexity of Entrepreneurial Ethics: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Archie B. Carroll, 2016. "Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Louise M. Hassan & Edward Shiu & Deirdre Shaw, 2016. "Who Says There is an Intention–Behaviour Gap? Assessing the Empirical Evidence of an Intention–Behaviour Gap in Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 219-236, June.
    5. GholamReza Zandi & Imran Shahzad & Muhammad Farrukh & Sebastian Kot, 2020. "Supporting Role of Society and Firms to COVID-19 Management among Medical Practitioners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smirti Kutaula & Alvina Gillani & Diana Gregory-Smith & Boris Bartikowski, 2024. "Ethical Consumerism in Emerging Markets: Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 651-673, May.
    2. Daphne Sobolev & Niklas Voege, 2020. "Consumer Judgment of Morally-Questionable Behaviors: The Relationship Between Ethical and Legal Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 145-160, August.
    3. Toti, Jean-François & Diallo, Mbaye Fall & Huaman-Ramirez, Richard, 2021. "Ethical sensitivity in consumers’ decision-making: The mediating and moderating role of internal locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 168-182.
    4. Luger, Michaela & Hofer, Katharina Maria & Floh, Arne, 2022. "Support for corporate social responsibility among generation Y consumers in advanced versus emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).
    5. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    6. Hildegunn Mellesmo Aslaksen & Clare Hildebrandt & Hans Chr. Garmann Johnsen, 2021. "The long-term transformation of the concept of CSR: towards a more comprehensive emphasis on sustainability," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Samir Marwan Hammami & Tareq Muhammad Alhousary & Ahmad Taha Kahwaji & Syed Ahsan Jamil, 2022. "The status quo of omani female entrepreneurs: a story of multidimensional success factors," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2063-2089, August.
    8. Sheng Ouyang & Renyi Li & Kaili Chen & Zhaoyang Liu, 2024. "Entrepreneurial Sustainability: The Impact Mechanism of Opportunity Co-Creation on Entrepreneurial Action in Underdeveloped Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Sharma, Dheeraj & Pandey, Shivendra, 2020. "The role payment depreciation in short temporal separations: Should online retailer make customers wait?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    10. Hye Jung Jung & Yun Jung Choi & Kyung Wha Oh, 2020. "Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” Gap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Yusheng Kong & Alex Antwi‐Adjei & Jonas Bawuah, 2020. "A systematic review of the business case for corporate social responsibility and firm performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 444-454, March.
    12. Khalid Mehmood & Fauzia Jabeen & Shilpa Iyanna & Hui Zhang & Patrice Piccardi & Nagendra Singh Nehra, 2024. "Exploring drivers of behavioral willingness to reduce plastic consumption and socially responsible consumption behavior: A stimulus–organism–behavior–consequence paradigm based environmental managemen," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3098-3118, July.
    13. Yuanqiong He & Junfang Zhang & Yuanyuan Zhou & Zhilin Yang, 2019. "“Monkey See, Monkey Do?”: The Effect of Construal Level on Consumers’ Reactions to Others’ Unethical Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 455-472, May.
    14. Shehawy, Yasser Moustafa, 2023. "In green consumption, why consumers do not walk their talk: A cross cultural examination from Saudi Arabia and UK," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    15. Deepa Sharma & Suman Chakraborty & Ashwath Ananda Rao & Lumen Shawn Lobo, 2023. "The Relationship of Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Bibliometric Overview," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    16. Wenchuan Huang & Shouming Chen & Talib Hussain & Ahmed Rabeeu, 2024. "How spirituality affects individuals’ attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: a moderated mediation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Valeria Superti & Cynthia Houmani & Ralph Hansmann & Ivo Baur & Claudia R. Binder, 2021. "Strategies for a Circular Economy in the Construction and Demolition Sector: Identifying the Factors Affecting the Recommendation of Recycled Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-32, April.
    18. Verma Prikshat & Parth Patel & Sanjeev Kumar & Suraksha Gupta & Ashish Malik, 2024. "Role of Socio-Cultural Capital and Country-Level Affluence in Ethical Consumerism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 697-711, May.
    19. Yihao Guo & Yanwen Song & Yimin Wang, 2024. "Happy troubles? CSR awards and CSR report quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2989-3005, July.
    20. Nicholas Burton & Mai Chi Vu, 2021. "Moral Identity and the Quaker tradition: Moral Dissonance Negotiation in the WorkPlace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 127-141, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:200-:d:1468726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.