IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i4p71-d1370665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standalone Valuation Method for Software-as-a-Service Operational Knowledge Derived from Human Intellectual Capital Qualitative Changes

Author

Listed:
  • Suguru Sakuma

    (Faculty of Policy Management, Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa-shi 252-0882, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Tomoyuki Furutani

    (Faculty of Policy Management, Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa-shi 252-0882, Kanagawa, Japan)

Abstract

This study focuses on digital operational knowledge belonging to natural persons and proposes a greenfield approach to differentiate the value of intangibles from that of human intellectual capital. Our research approach involves two assessments. Assessment 1 evaluates intangible assets using the internally generated goodwill (IGG) measure. We analyze time-series IGG data for six digital sectors, using the top 90 software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies as a benchmark. The results indicate that the IGG of the SaaS benchmark is higher than the total IGG of the six sectors. Assessment 2 focuses on the correlation between digital labor investment and digital investment returns before and after 2013 for the six sectors to identify positive and negative correlations from 2013 onward. The results indicate that, since 2013, a qualitative change has occurred in digital labor capital that has not been reflected in financial statements because of accounting distortions and that the returns on investment for digital labor have been underestimated. The standalone valuation of digital know-how that belongs to natural persons, previously based on operating expense, will be based on capital expenditure. In addition, amortization will have the same contribution as depreciation of tangible assets to value creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Suguru Sakuma & Tomoyuki Furutani, 2024. "Standalone Valuation Method for Software-as-a-Service Operational Knowledge Derived from Human Intellectual Capital Qualitative Changes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:71-:d:1370665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/4/71/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/4/71/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valerie Walker & Gail Bowkett & Isabelle Duchaine, 2018. "All Companies Are Technology Companies: Preparing Canadians with the Skills for a Digital Future," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 44(S1), pages 153-158, November.
    2. Grigorios Emvalomatis, 2017. "Is productivity diverging in the EU? Evidence from 11 Member States," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1171-1192, November.
    3. Nadim Ahmad & Paul Schreyer, 2016. "Are GDP and Productivity Up to the Challenges of the Digital Economy?," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 30, pages 4-27, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naveed, Kashif & Watanabe, Chihiro & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2018. "The transformative direction of innovation toward an IoT-based society - Increasing dependency on uncaptured GDP in global ICT firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 23-46.
    2. Wulong Gu, 2018. "Accounting for Slower Productivity Growth in the Canadian Business Sector after 2000: The Role of Capital Measurement Issues," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 34, pages 21-39, Spring.
    3. Alexander Murray, 2017. "What Explains the Post-2004 U.S.Productivity Slowdown?," CSLS Research Reports 2017-05, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    4. Guoge Yang & Feng Deng & Yifei Wang & Xianhong Xiang, 2022. "Digital Paradox: Platform Economy and High-Quality Economic Development—New Evidence from Provincial Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Watanabe, Chihiro & Tou, Yuji & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2018. "A new paradox of the digital economy - Structural sources of the limitation of GDP statistics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 9-23.
    6. Yuan, Shengjun & Musibau, Hammed Oluwaseyi & Genç, Sema Yılmaz & Shaheen, Riffat & Ameen, Anam & Tan, Zhixiong, 2021. "Digitalization of economy is the key factor behind fourth industrial revolution: How G7 countries are overcoming with the financing issues?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Berislav Žmuk & Ksenija Dumièiæ & Irena Paliæ, 2018. "Forecasting Labour Productivity in the European Union Member States: Is Labour Productivity Changing as Expected?," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(3-B), pages 504-523.
    8. Tou, Yuji & Watanabe, Chihiro & Moriya, Kuniko & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2019. "Harnessing soft innovation resources leads to neo open innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    9. Niebel, Thomas, 2019. "Wachstumsperspektiven der digitalen Transformation: Wird der ökonomische Mehrwert der Digitalisierung in der Volkswirtschaftlichen Gesamtrechnung angemessen abgebildet?," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 142, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    10. Herdon, Miklós & Csordás, Adrián, 2019. "Changes In The Relationship Between Ict Use And Economic Development In Eu Member States 2010-2016," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 13(01-2), June.
    11. M.A. Afonasova & E.E. Panfilova & M.A. Galichkina, 2018. "Social and Economic Background of Digital Economy: Conditions for Transition," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 292-302.
    12. Nicholas Crafts, 2017. "Is Slow Economic Growth the ‘New Normal’ for Europe?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 45(3), pages 283-297, September.
    13. Ian Goldin & Pantelis Koutroumpis & François Lafond & Julian Winkler, 2024. "Why Is Productivity Slowing Down?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 196-268, March.
    14. Richard Pomfret, 2020. "Global Production Networks, New Trade Technologies and the Challenge for International Institutions," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(1), pages 21-41, February.
    15. Gilbert Cette & Aurélien Devillard & Vincenzo Spiezia, 2022. "Growth Factors in Developed Countries: A 1960–2019 Growth Accounting Decomposition," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 64(2), pages 159-185, June.
    16. Alexander Murray, 2018. "What Explains the Post-2004 U.S. Productivity Slowdown?," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 34, pages 81-109, Spring.
    17. Hippolyte d'Albis & Julien Navaux & Jacques Pelletan & Francois Charles Wolff, 2019. "Economic growth and household production in France (1985-2010) [Croissance économique et production domestique en France (1985-2010)]," PSE Working Papers halshs-02355123, HAL.
    18. Schubert, Torben & Ashouri, Sajad & Deschryvere, Matthias & Jäger, Angela & Visentin, Fabiana & Cunningham, Scott & Hajikhani, Arash & Pukelis, Lukas & Suominen, Arho, 2023. "The role of product digitization for productivity," MERIT Working Papers 2023-004, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    19. David M. Byrne, 2022. "The Digital Economy and Productivity," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2022-038, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    20. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Zeng, Mingli & Luo, Kang, 2023. "Food security and digital economy in China: A pathway towards sustainable development," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1106-1125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:71-:d:1370665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.