IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i2p46-d1059916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthy and Happy Citizens: The Opportunities and Challenges of Co-Producing Citizens’ Health and Well-Being in Vulnerable Neighborhoods

Author

Listed:
  • Carola Van Eijk

    (Public Administration, Leiden University, P.O. Box 13228, 2501 EE The Hague, The Netherlands)

  • Wilma Van der Vlegel-Brouwer

    (LUMC, Leiden University, P.O. Box 13228, 2501 EE The Hague, The Netherlands
    SevenSenses Institute, 3561 RT Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Jet Bussemaker

    (LUMC, Leiden University, P.O. Box 13228, 2501 EE The Hague, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This explorative study aims to contribute to the debate about citizen involvement in (complex) medical and social issues. Our research goals are: (1) to explore the main opportunities, threats and challenges to co-producing healthcare in vulnerable communities from the perspective of professionals, co-producers (i.e., citizens with a volunteering role) and service users (i.e., patients); (2) to distil lessons for public managers concerning the main issues involved in designing co-production initiatives. We studied co-production initiatives in the Dutch city, The Hague. These initiatives were part of a broader, unique movement named ‘Healthy and Happy The Hague’, which aims to change the way healthcare/social services are provided. Two intertwined research projects combine insights from interviews, focus group meetings and observations. The first project analyzed a variety of existing co-production initiatives in several neighborhoods; the second project involved longitudinal participatory action research on what stakeholders require to engage in co-production. The two research projects showed similarities and differences in the observed opportunities/treats/challenges. The study found that empowering citizens in their role as co-producers requires major changes in the professionals’ outlook and supporting role in the communities. It illustrates the potential of synergizing insights from healthcare governance and public administration co-production literature to benefit co-production practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Carola Van Eijk & Wilma Van der Vlegel-Brouwer & Jet Bussemaker, 2023. "Healthy and Happy Citizens: The Opportunities and Challenges of Co-Producing Citizens’ Health and Well-Being in Vulnerable Neighborhoods," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:46-:d:1059916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/2/46/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/2/46/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Peters, 2010. "Bureaucracy and Democracy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 209-222, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ardesch, F.H. & Meulendijk, M.C. & Kist, J.M. & Vos, R.C. & Vos, H.M.M. & Kiefte-de Jong, J.C. & Spruit, M & Bruijnzeels, M.A. & Bussemaker, M.J. & Numans, M.E. & Struijs, J.N., 2023. "The introduction of a data-driven population health management approach in the Netherlands since 2019: The Extramural LUMC Academic Network data infrastructure," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ole Danielsen & Kutsal Yesilkagit, 2014. "The Effects of European Regulatory Networks on the Bureaucratic Autonomy of National Regulatory Authorities," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 353-371, September.
    2. Annelin Gustavsen & Asbjørn Røiseland & Jon Pierre, 2014. "Introduction: Toward output legitimacy in local government?," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 119-122, July.
    3. Yesilkagit, Kutsal & Bauer, Michael & Peters, B. Guy & Pierre, Jon, 2024. "The Guardian State: Strengthening the Public Service against Democratic Backsliding," OSF Preprints nkqa8, Center for Open Science.
    4. SeoYoun Choi, 2018. "Bureaucratic characteristics and citizen trust in civil service in OECD member nations," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 114-133, June.
    5. Ali Farazmand, 2017. "Governance Reforms: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly; and the Sound: Examining the Past and Exploring the Future of Public Organizations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 595-617, December.
    6. Joren Verschaeve & Jan Orbie, 2016. "The DAC is Dead, Long Live the DCF? A Comparative Analysis of the OECD Development Assistance Committee and the UN Development Cooperation Forum," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(4), pages 571-587, September.
    7. Cosmo Howard, 2015. "Rethinking Post-NPM Governance: The Bureaucratic Struggle to Implement One-Stop-Shopping for Government Services in Alberta," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 237-254, June.
    8. Kristin Reichborn-Kjennerud, 2015. "Resistance to Control—Norwegian Ministries’ and Agencies’ Reactions to Performance Audit," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 17-32, March.
    9. Ali Farazmand, 2013. "Conclusion: Can We Go Home? Roads Taken, Targets Met, and Lessons Learned on Governance and Organizational Eclecticism in the Public Arena," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 219-228, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:46-:d:1059916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.