IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i4p126-d928045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reputation of Public Organizations: What Dimensions Are Crucial?

Author

Listed:
  • Galvão Meirinhos

    (Department of Literacy, Arts and Communication, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro—UTAD, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Maximino Bessa

    (Department of Engineering, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro—UTAD, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Carmem Leal

    (CETRAD Research Center, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro—UTAD, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Márcio Oliveira

    (NECE-Research Center in Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilha, Portugal
    School of Education and Social Sciences, Polytechnic of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal)

  • Amélia Carvalho

    (CIICESI, ESTG, Porto Polytechnic, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Rui Silva

    (CETRAD Research Center, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro—UTAD, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

Abstract

This paper explores the relationships among variables and determines the influences of dimensions (i.e., municipal satisfaction, organizational performance, perceived quality, contestations and complaints of the municipal executive) on the notoriety, image, and reputation (NIR) of municipal executives. We attempted to understand if citizens’ opinions influenced the evaluations, recommendations, and contestations based on NIR. Parishes in the municipality of Valongo were selected and analysed, namely Alfena, Campo e Sobrado, Valongo, and Ermesinde; a total of 998 questionnaires were collected. It was concluded that all of the studied dimensions were statistically significant in the final structural estimated model. The structural results point to municipal satisfaction and contestations and complaints of municipal executives as having directly positive and statistically significant influences on NIR. Organizational performance and perceived quality have directly positive but not statistically significant influences on NIR. The results of this research suggest that obtaining the personal opinions of citizens (e.g., regarding the work performances of their mayors) allows citizens to feel heard and active in their municipalities. From the point of view of public executives, the results of this type of study could provide valid information that allows stakeholders to make political decisions that are appropriate for the interests of their communities (e.g., by listening to their citizens).

Suggested Citation

  • Galvão Meirinhos & Maximino Bessa & Carmem Leal & Márcio Oliveira & Amélia Carvalho & Rui Silva, 2022. "Reputation of Public Organizations: What Dimensions Are Crucial?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:126-:d:928045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/126/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/126/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leuthesser, Lance & Kohli, Chiranjeev, 1997. "Corporate identity: The role of mission statements," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 59-66.
    2. Åshild Skjegstad Lockert & Hilde Bjørnå & Kristian H. Haugen & Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen, 2019. "Reputation reform strategies in local government: investigating Denmark and Norway," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 504-525, July.
    3. Galvão Meirinhos & Maximino Bessa & Carmem Leal & Rui Silva, 2022. "Municipal Rating System—A Municipality Compliance Index," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Hayagreeva Rao, 1994. "The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S1), pages 29-44, December.
    5. Kotha, Suresh & Rajgopal, Shivaram & Rindova, Violina, 2001. "Reputation Building and Performance: An Empirical Analysis of the Top-50 Pure Internet Firms," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 571-586, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Purificación Alcaide-Pulido & Belén Gutiérrez-Villar & Mariano Carbonero-Ruz, 2022. "Measuring the Image of Private University as a Generic Product: Validation of a Scale," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingli Luo & Xufei Ma & Zeyu Wang, 2022. "The moderate-reputation trap: Evidence from a Chinese cross-border business-to-business e-commerce portal," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 395-432, June.
    2. Eileen Fischer & Rebecca Reuber, 2007. "The Good, the Bad, and the Unfamiliar: The Challenges of Reputation Formation Facing New Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(1), pages 53-75, January.
    3. Xueyan Dong & Jingyu Gao & Sunny Li Sun & Kangtao Ye, 2021. "Doing extreme by doing good," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 291-315, March.
    4. Ning Jia, 2017. "Diversification of pre-IPO ownership and foreign IPO performance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1031-1061, May.
    5. Kim, Yeonshin & Hur, Won-Moo & Lee, Luri, 2023. "Understanding customer participation in CSR activities: The impact of perceptions of CSR, affective commitment, brand equity, and corporate reputation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Benjamin Cole & Preeta Banerjee, 2013. "Morally Contentious Technology-Field Intersections: The Case of Biotechnology in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 555-574, July.
    7. Pascual Berrone & Jordi Surroca & Josep Tribó, 2007. "Corporate Ethical Identity as a Determinant of Firm Performance: A Test of the Mediating Role of Stakeholder Satisfaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 35-53, November.
    8. Tammar B. Zilber, 2011. "Institutional Multiplicity in Practice: A Tale of Two High-Tech Conferences in Israel," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1539-1559, December.
    9. Lise Arena & Anthony Hussenot, 2021. "From Innovations at Work to Innovative Ways of Conceptualizing Organization: A Brief History of Organization Studies," Post-Print hal-03290300, HAL.
    10. H. L. Zou & R. C. Zeng & S. X. Zeng & Jonathan J. Shi, 2015. "How Do Environmental Violation Events Harm Corporate Reputation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 836-854, December.
    11. Y. Sekou Bermiss & Benjamin L. Hallen & Rory McDonald & Emily C. Pahnke, 2017. "Entrepreneurial beacons: The Yale endowment, run‐ups, and the growth of venture capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 545-565, March.
    12. Ben-Nasr, Hamdi & Ghouma, Hatem, 2018. "Employee welfare and stock price crash risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 700-725.
    13. James Liou & Mei-Ling Chuang, 2010. "Evaluating corporate image and reputation using fuzzy MCDM approach in airline market," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1079-1091, October.
    14. Amanpreet Kaur & Balwinder Singh, 2017. "Construing Reputation from Gender Diversity on Boards," Paradigm, , vol. 21(2), pages 111-125, December.
    15. Kiril Dimitrov & Marin Geshkov, 2018. "Dominating Attributes Of Professed Firm Culture Of Holding Companies – Members Of The Bulgarian Industrial Capital Association," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 384-418, September.
    16. Morschheuser Petra & Redler Joern, 2015. "Reputation Management for Scientific Organisations — Framework Development and Exemplification," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 18(4), pages 1-35, December.
    17. Rohit Aggarwal & Ram Gopal & Alok Gupta & Harpreet Singh, 2012. "Putting Money Where the Mouths Are: The Relation Between Venture Financing and Electronic Word-of-Mouth," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-2), pages 976-992, September.
    18. Kick, Markus, 2015. "The Price Premium Induced by Branding: A Health Care Case Study," EconStor Preprints 182504, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    19. Cécile CEZANNE & Laurence SAGLIETTO, 2014. "Human Capital-Intensive Firms and Symbolic Value Creation," Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 7(1), pages 70-88.
    20. Céline Desmoulins, 2021. "Reputation measurement: a tool for ski station applied to Isère Mountain," Post-Print hal-03149407, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:126-:d:928045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.