IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/ccadaa/vhtml10.3280-cca2019-001002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The correction of double entry bookkeeping errors in the late 14th century

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Kuter
  • Marina Gurskaya
  • Ripsime Bagdasaryan

Abstract

There have been several studies of medieval bookkeeping practices. This paper adds to that literature by focusing on the treatment of errors in the ledger of the Medieval Italian merchant, Francesco di Marco Datini, most of which were for the years 1395-6. The analysis shows that, contrary to the perception in the literature, accountants of that period not only detected errors, but also devised methods to address them that ensured that the overall financial result reflected a fair presentation of what had occurred, and that they did not simply use the account for Profits and losses as an easy outlet in which to record an amount that balanced the books. In addition, the accuracy of individual ledger accounts was not deemed important once they had been balanced, even after errors were detected.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Kuter & Marina Gurskaya & Ripsime Bagdasaryan, 2019. "The correction of double entry bookkeeping errors in the late 14th century," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 7-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:ccadaa:v:html10.3280/cca2019-001002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=64289&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massimo Sargiacomo & Stefania Servalli & Paolo Andrei, 2012. "Fabio Besta: accounting thinker and accounting history pioneer," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 249-267, November.
    2. de Roover, Raymond, 1958. "The Story of the Alberti Company of Florence, 1302–1348, as Revealed in Its Account Books," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 14-59, April.
    3. de Roover, Raymond, 1946. "The Medici Bank Organization and Management," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 24-52, May.
    4. B. S. Yamey, 2005. "The historical significance of double-entry bookkeeping: Some non-Sombartian claims," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 77-88.
    5. Alan Sangster, 2010. "Using accounting history and Luca Pacioli to put relevance back into the teaching of double entry," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 23-39.
    6. Goldthwaite, Richard, 2015. "The Practice and Culture of Accounting in Renaissance Florence," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 611-647, September.
    7. Basil Yamey, 2000. "The 'particular gain or loss upon each article we deal in': an aspect of mercantile accounting, 1300-1800," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12.
    8. Lee, G. A., 1975. "The Concept of Profit in British Accounting, 1760–1900," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 6-36, April.
    9. Valerio Antonelli & Massimo Sargiacomo, 2015. "Alberto Ceccherelli (1885-1958): pioneer in the history of accounting practice and leader in international dissemination," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 121-144, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadia Matringe, 2016. "Ratio Pecuniam Parit Accounting and the making of financial markets in the Early Modern Age," Working Papers hal-01358129, HAL.
    2. David Alexander & Roberta Fasiello, 2018. "A theoretical contribution to 21st Century problems in financial reporting," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 41-66.
    3. Lusiani, Maria & Pancot, Chiara & Sangster, Alan & Vedovato, Marco, 2023. "Bookkeeping, but not for profit: A special form of double entry in a 16th century Venetian charity," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    4. Edwards, John Richard & Dean, Graeme & Clarke, Frank, 2009. "Merchants' accounts, performance assessment and decision making in mercantilist Britain," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 551-570, July.
    5. Samuel JUBÉ, 2020. "Labour and international accounting standards: A question of social justice," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 95-115, March.
    6. Silvia ANGELONI, 2013. "Aldo Amaduzzi: One of the Best Italian Scholars in the Business Disciplines," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(3), pages 367-376, July.
    7. A. Arnold & S. McCartney, 2002. "The beginnings of accounting for capital consumption: disclosure practices in the British railway industry, 1830–55," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 195-208.
    8. Valerio Antonelli & Raffaele D?Alessio & Emanuela Mattia Cafaro & Michele Bigoni, 2019. "The Pope and the Train: Financial Reporting Practices in the Railroad Companies of the Papal States (1846-1870)," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 7-34.
    9. Richard Macve, 2002. "Insights to be gained from the study of ancient accounting history: some reflections on the new edition of Finley's The Ancient Economy," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 453-472.
    10. Gustavo Alberto Ruiz Rojas, 2016. "Retórica y contabilidad: de la crítica retórica a la retórica crítica," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 25(1), pages 243-270, December.
    11. Malcolm Anderson, 2006. "Accounting History Publications 2005," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 457-462.
    12. Anna Vysotskaya & Oleg Kolvakh & Greg Stoner, 2016. "Mutual calculations in creating accounting models: a demonstration of the power of matrix mathematics in accounting education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 396-413, July.
    13. Tiziana Di Cimbrini, 2016. "L?Accounting nella dialettica tra scienza e tecnologia: il caso dei manuali sul mutuo soccorso in Inghilterra ed in Italia tra il XIX e XX secolo," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 11-40.
    14. Sugahara, Satoshi & Cilloni, Andrea, 2021. "Mediation effect of students’ perception of accounting on the relationship between game-based learning and learning approaches," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    15. Braun Eduard, 2019. "The Ecological Rationality of Historical Costs and Conservatism," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-30, March.
    16. Glenn Stevens, 2011. "The Role of Finance," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 87(276), pages 1-10, March.
    17. Rubin, Jared, 2010. "Bills of exchange, interest bans, and impersonal exchange in Islam and Christianity," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 213-227, April.
    18. Giuseppe Modarelli, 2021. "Accounting and the budget negotiation process: The case of the Holy Shroud Exposition (1931) during a period of austerity," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 7-53.
    19. Warwick Funnell & Jeffrey Robertson, 2011. "Capitalist accounting in sixteenth century Holland," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(5), pages 560-586, June.
    20. Hoskin, Keith & Macve, Richard, 2012. "Contesting the indigenous development of “Chinese double-entry bookkeeping” and its significance in China’s economic institutions and business organization before c.1850," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42583, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:ccadaa:v:html10.3280/cca2019-001002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=178 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.