IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v22y2012i3p249-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fabio Besta: accounting thinker and accounting history pioneer

Author

Listed:
  • Massimo Sargiacomo
  • Stefania Servalli
  • Paolo Andrei

Abstract

This paper seeks to reveal Fabio Besta (1845--1922) as an important accounting thinker. It attempts to underline his influence on accounting theory, and highlight his major impact on the development of accounting history knowledge. It is shown that Besta, through his accounting thought, founded on a value-based theory and an equity-centred accounting system ( sistema patrimoniale ), facilitated the shift from a personalistic to a non-personalistic, or materialistic, theory of accounts. It is suggested that Besta's La Ragioneria is a milestone in accounting history. In this work he anticipated the adoption of a comparative international approach to accounting history research, particularly in relation to the exploration of pre-Pacioli double-entry bookkeeping. His work was also important to the dissemination of knowledge about early double-entry bookkeeping practices, and thereby encouraged further investigations by the accounting history community.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimo Sargiacomo & Stefania Servalli & Paolo Andrei, 2012. "Fabio Besta: accounting thinker and accounting history pioneer," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 249-267, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:22:y:2012:i:3:p:249-267
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2012.728904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2012.728904
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21552851.2012.728904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuri Biondi & Arnaldo Canziani & Thierry Kirat, 2007. "The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting, and the Law," Post-Print halshs-00203355, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ewa Sniezek, 2024. "Cash Recognition of Events in Accounting in the Polish Territories under the Partitions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 428-440.
    2. Marco Angelo Marinoni, 2014. "Evoluzioni dottrinali su incertezza e rischio. Da Knight e Sassi alla Teoria del Caos," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 33-53.
    3. Silvia ANGELONI, 2013. "Aldo Amaduzzi: One of the Best Italian Scholars in the Business Disciplines," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(3), pages 367-376, July.
    4. David Alexander & Roberta Fasiello, 2018. "A theoretical contribution to 21st Century problems in financial reporting," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 41-66.
    5. Mikhail Kuter & Marina Gurskaya & Ripsime Bagdasaryan, 2019. "The correction of double entry bookkeeping errors in the late 14th century," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 7-30.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blanche Segrestin & Armand Hatchuel & Kevin Levillain, 2021. "When the Law Distinguishes Between the Enterprise and the Corporation: The Case of the New French Law on Corporate Purpose," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Andrea Cuccia, 2018. "Potential of IFRS 8: Managerial "customization", relevance of subsidiaries and separate financial statements," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 103-131.
    3. Strasser Kurt, 2011. "A Comment on "The Legal Structure of the Firm"," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-8, January.
    4. Yuri Biondi & Pierpaolo Giannoccolo, 2015. "Share price formation, market exuberance and financial stability under alternative accounting regimes," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(2), pages 333-362, October.
    5. Roberto Aprile & Mario Nicoliello, 2016. ": a missing connection between the theory and academic syllabi," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 414-435, July.
    6. Tsunogaya Noriyuki & Okada Hiromasa & Patel Chris, 2011. "The Case for Economic and Accounting Dualism: Towards Reconciling the Japanese Accounting System with the Global Trend of Fair Value Accounting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-56, October.
    7. Gerhard Schnyder, 2008. "Revisiting the Party Paradox of Finance Capitalism: Evidence from Switzerland, Sweden and the Netherlands," Working Papers wp372, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    8. Butzbach Olivier & von Mettenheim Kurt E., 2015. "Alternative Banking and Theory," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 105-171, July.
    9. Damien Bo & Philippe Luu, 2011. "Audit public, audit privé," Post-Print hal-00646767, HAL.
    10. Robé Jean-Philippe, 2012. "Science vs. Ideology: A Comment on Lynn Stout's New Thinking on "Shareholder Primacy"," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-13, June.
    11. Blanche Segrestin & Armand Hatchuel & Kevin Levillain, 2021. "When the Law Distinguishes Between the Enterprise and the Corporation: The Case of the New French Law on Corporate Purpose," Post-Print hal-02465609, HAL.
    12. Larry Bensimhon & Yuri Biondi, 2013. "Financial Bubbles, Common Knowledge and Alternative Accounting Regimes: An Experimental Analysis of Artificial Spot Security Markets," The Japanese Accounting Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 3, pages 21-59, December.
    13. Lenore Palladino, 2022. "Economic Policies for Innovative Enterprises: Implementing Multi-Stakeholder Corporate Governance," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 5-25, March.
    14. Biondi Yuri, 2017. "Which Accounting Regulation for Europe’s Economy and Society: Workshop organised by the Laboratory of Excellence on Financial Regulation (Labex ReFi) Under the auspices of the European Parliament, Eur," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-5, July.
    15. Virgile Chassagnon, 2011. "The Network Firm as a Single Real Entity: Beyond the Aggregate of Distinct Legal Entities," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 113-136.
    16. Biondi, Yuri & Giannoccolo, Pierpaolo & Galam, Serge, 2012. "Formation of share market prices under heterogeneous beliefs and common knowledge," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(22), pages 5532-5545.
    17. Biondi Yuri, 2012. "What Do Shareholders Do? Accounting, Ownership and the Theory of the Firm: Implications for Corporate Governance and Reporting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-29, June.
    18. Scherer Anna-Lena & Schmiel Ute, 2021. "Ethical and Legal Responsibility of Multinational Corporate Groups for a Fair Share of Taxes," Nordic Tax Journal, Sciendo, vol. 2021(1), pages 32-46, October.
    19. Thomas Lamarche, 2009. "Les nouvelles institutions de la "mesure" de la rse entre communication et évaluation," Post-Print halshs-00865063, HAL.
    20. Thiemann Matthias, 2021. "The Political Economy of Private Law: Comment on ‘The code of capital – how the law creates wealth and inequality’," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 37-51, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:22:y:2012:i:3:p:249-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.