IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/etc/journl/y2022i25p184-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students satisfaction with the online teaching process

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Are?an
  • Lauren?iu Gabriel ?îru

Abstract

This study is about student satisfaction in the online teaching process. The pandemic situation forced us to move the educational activities in the online environment for the safety of all its participants. The methodological design is the quantitative one, the research method used is the sociological survey. This study tried to identify students’ perception, effectiveness, satisfaction, and self-perceived efficiency regarding the teaching process in the online environment. The questionnaire was translated and adapted into Romanian. It consists of 26 questions, divided into five dimensions. The sampling method was the non-probabilistic convenience one, with voluntary participation. The results provided tell us those female respondents were more open to online methods, resulting in higher satisfaction despite common knowledge. However, the results should be viewed with reservations, as the data collected are not homogeneous, and the respondents were chosen by the voluntary participation method. This approach can be seen as a starting point for future research related to the satisfaction of the teaching process through e-learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Are?an & Lauren?iu Gabriel ?îru, 2022. "Students satisfaction with the online teaching process," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 25, pages 184-193, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2022:i:25:p:184-193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr25/Academicus-MMXXII-25-184-193.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr25/Academicus-MMXXII-25-184-193.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlin Dowling & Jayne Godfrey & Nikole Gyles, 2003. "Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students' learning outcomes?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 373-391.
    2. ., 2020. "The new dynamics of technological innovation," Chapters, in: Defense Technological Innovation, chapter 3, pages 39-70, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. ., 2020. "Technological revolutions and development," Chapters, in: Humanitarian Local and Regional Development, chapter 4, pages 102-139, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. ., 2020. "Inventive ideas as a driver of technology transfer," Chapters, in: Invention, Innovation and U.S. Federal Laboratories, chapter 5, pages 65-78, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Tzu-Chin Rejoice Chou, 2014. "A Scale of University Students' Attitudes toward e-Learning on the Moodle System," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), IGI Global, vol. 4(3), pages 49-65, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Purnomo, Agung, 2022. "Desa Wirausaha sebagai Eskalasi Ekonomi Desa berbasis Kewirausahaan," OSF Preprints np629, Center for Open Science.
    2. Carlos J. Asarta & James R. Schmidt, 2013. "Student Choices of Reduced Seat Time in a Blended Introductory Statistics Course," Working Papers 13-14, University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
    3. Nia Love & Nadine Fry, 2006. "Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 151-166.
    4. Jackson, Mark, 2014. "Accounting “Boot Camp”," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-97.
    5. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Q. & Zhou, Meng & Hong Chua, Ming & Romano Alho, André & Oh, Simon & Seshadri, Ravi & Le, Diem-Trinh, 2023. "Examining the effects of Automated Mobility-on-Demand services on public transport systems using an agent-based simulation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Jean Ingersoll Abbott & Barry R. Palatnik, 2018. "Students’ perceptions of their first accounting class: implications for instructors," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 72-93, January.
    7. Chen, Li & Wemhoff, Aaron P., 2021. "Predicting embodied carbon emissions from purchased electricity for United States counties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    8. Debbie Delaney & Lisa McManus & Chew Ng, 2015. "First Year Accounting Students’ Perceptions Of Blended Learning," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 9-23.
    9. McCarthy, Mary & Kusaila, Michelle & Grasso, Lawrence, 2019. "Intermediate accounting and auditing: Does course delivery mode impact student performance?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 26-42.
    10. Federico Schimperna & Fabio Nappo & Bruno Marsigalia, 2021. "Student Entrepreneurship in Universities: The State-of-the-Art," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Keller, J. Howard & Hassell, John M. & Webber, Sally A. & Johnson, James N., 2009. "A comparison of academic performance in traditional and hybrid sections of introductory managerial accounting," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 147-154.
    12. Seung Jae Lee & Hyunae Lee & Taegoo Terry Kim, 2018. "A Study on the Instructor Role in Dealing with Mixed Contents: How It Affects Learner Satisfaction and Retention in e-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Crawford, Louise & Helliar, Christine & Monk, Elizabeth & Stevenson, Lorna, 2011. "SCAM: Design of a learning and teaching resource," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 61-72.
    14. Cherifa Benkaddour, 2023. "The Implementation of E-learning in Algeria during the COVID-19 Time: Case Study of Relizane Second-Year English Department Students of Master Degree," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 126-137, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2022:i:25:p:184-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabor Vasmatics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etctial.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.