IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joaced/v27y2009i3p147-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of academic performance in traditional and hybrid sections of introductory managerial accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Keller, J. Howard
  • Hassell, John M.
  • Webber, Sally A.
  • Johnson, James N.

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a comparison of academic performance (course grade) in two sections of a principles of managerial accounting course, one held in a traditional format (classes held two days per week in a classroom setting) and one in a hybrid format (one class period held in a classroom setting and one in a web-based environment). After controlling for other factors, academic performance was not significantly associated with class delivery format (traditional or hybrid).

Suggested Citation

  • Keller, J. Howard & Hassell, John M. & Webber, Sally A. & Johnson, James N., 2009. "A comparison of academic performance in traditional and hybrid sections of introductory managerial accounting," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 147-154.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joaced:v:27:y:2009:i:3:p:147-154
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575110000060
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlin Dowling & Jayne Godfrey & Nikole Gyles, 2003. "Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students' learning outcomes?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 373-391.
    2. Moy Yin Koh & Hian Chye Koh, 1999. "The determinants of performance in an accountancy degree programme," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 13-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos J. Asarta & James R. Schmidt, 2013. "Student Choices of Reduced Seat Time in a Blended Introductory Statistics Course," Working Papers 13-14, University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
    2. McCarthy, Mary & Kusaila, Michelle & Grasso, Lawrence, 2019. "Intermediate accounting and auditing: Does course delivery mode impact student performance?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 26-42.
    3. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.
    4. Debbie Delaney & Lisa McManus & Chew Ng, 2015. "First Year Accounting Students’ Perceptions Of Blended Learning," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 9-23.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos J. Asarta & James R. Schmidt, 2013. "Student Choices of Reduced Seat Time in a Blended Introductory Statistics Course," Working Papers 13-14, University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
    2. Nia Love & Nadine Fry, 2006. "Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 151-166.
    3. Neal Arthur & Patricia Everaert, 2012. "Gender and Performance in Accounting Examinations: Exploring the Impact of Examination Format," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 471-487, October.
    4. Angus Duff, 2004. "Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: the role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 409-430.
    5. Marann Byrne & Barbara Flood & Pauline Willis, 2002. "The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 27-42.
    6. Elizabeth Gammie & Brenda Paver & Bob Gammie & Fiona Duncan, 2003. "Gender differences in accounting education: an undergraduate exploration," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 177-196.
    7. McPhail, Ken & Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2010. "Class, social deprivation and accounting education in Scottish schools: Implications for the reproduction of the accounting profession and practice," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 31-50.
    8. Jamie Alcock & Sophie Cockcroft & Frank Finn, 2008. "Quantifying the advantage of secondary mathematics study for accounting and finance undergraduates," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(5), pages 697-718, December.
    9. Paul Wells & Paul De Lange & Peter Fieger, 2008. "Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second‐year accounting course: determinants of overall student perception," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 503-518, September.
    10. Andrew Worthington & Helen Higgs, 2003. "Factors explaining the choice of a finance major: the role of students' characteristics, personality and perceptions of the profession," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21.
    11. Jackson, Mark, 2014. "Accounting “Boot Camp”," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-97.
    12. Nicola J. Beatson & David A. G. Berg & Jeffrey K. Smith, 2020. "The influence of self‐efficacy beliefs and prior learning on performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(2), pages 1271-1294, June.
    13. Jean Ingersoll Abbott & Barry R. Palatnik, 2018. "Students’ perceptions of their first accounting class: implications for instructors," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 72-93, January.
    14. Denis Are?an & Lauren?iu Gabriel ?îru, 2022. "Students satisfaction with the online teaching process," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 25, pages 184-193, January.
    15. Debbie Delaney & Lisa McManus & Chew Ng, 2015. "First Year Accounting Students’ Perceptions Of Blended Learning," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 9-23.
    16. Lucas, Ursula & Meyer, Jan H.F., 2005. "‘Towards a mapping of the student world’: the identification of variation in students' conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 177-204.
    17. Paul de Lange & Felix Mavondo, 2004. "Gender and motivational differences in approaches to learning by a cohort of open learning students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 431-448.
    18. Duff, Angus & Mladenovic, Rosina, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of accounting students' approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 321-338.
    19. McCarthy, Mary & Kusaila, Michelle & Grasso, Lawrence, 2019. "Intermediate accounting and auditing: Does course delivery mode impact student performance?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 26-42.
    20. Yilmaz Guney, 2009. "Exogenous and Endogenous Factors Influencing Students' Performance in Undergraduate Accounting Modules," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 51-73.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joaced:v:27:y:2009:i:3:p:147-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-accounting-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.