IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joaced/v32y2014i1p88-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting “Boot Camp”

Author

Listed:
  • Jackson, Mark

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of a program designed to set appropriate student expectations and motivate students to put forth the necessary effort to succeed in intermediate accounting and other upper-division accounting courses. At a mid-sized public university in the Western US many students enrolled in Intermediate Accounting I (their first upper-division course) struggle with the rigor and academic demands of this course, resulting in failure rates of 30–45%. In many cases, students new to upper-division courses appear to lack a commitment to, or awareness of, the effort needed for success in the accounting program. The faculty implemented an accounting “Boot Camp” to prepare new accounting majors for the expectations of the program. This paper details the implementation of the Boot Camp and reviews its effectiveness by comparing the performance of attendees with the performance of non-attendees. After controlling for other contributing factors, the evidence suggests that attendees outperform their non-attending peers in Intermediate Accounting I. This relatively low-cost intervention should be attractive to faculty concerned about the common problem of students failing and then retaking intermediate accounting.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackson, Mark, 2014. "Accounting “Boot Camp”," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joaced:v:32:y:2014:i:1:p:88-97
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2014.01.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575114000050
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2014.01.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlin Dowling & Jayne Godfrey & Nikole Gyles, 2003. "Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students' learning outcomes?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 373-391.
    2. Neil Hartnett & Jennifer Römcke & Christine Yap, 2004. "Student performance in tertiary‐level accounting: an international student focus," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 44(2), pages 163-185, July.
    3. Louise Gracia & Ellis Jenkins, 2002. "An exploration of student failure on an undergraduate accounting programme of study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 93-107.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2015. "Accounting education literature review (2013–2014)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 69-127.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmet Onay* & Serdar Benligiray, 2018. "Internal Factors Affecting Student Performance in Accounting Courses at a Vocational School," Sumerianz Journal of Economics and Finance, Sumerianz Publication, vol. 1(3), pages 82-90, 09-2018.
    2. Carlos J. Asarta & James R. Schmidt, 2013. "Student Choices of Reduced Seat Time in a Blended Introductory Statistics Course," Working Papers 13-14, University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
    3. Bernadette Smith & William Maguire & Helen Haijuan Han, 2018. "Generic skills in accounting: perspectives of Chinese postgraduate students," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(2), pages 535-559, June.
    4. Nia Love & Nadine Fry, 2006. "Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 151-166.
    5. Rodrigo Macaraig Velasco, 2019. "Factors Associated with Failure in Accounting: A Case Study of the Omani Students," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(6), pages 157-157, December.
    6. Marriott, Pru & Lau, Alice, 2008. "The use of on-line summative assessment in an undergraduate financial accounting course," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 73-90.
    7. Montagud Mascarell, M. Dolores & Gandía Cabedo, Juan L., 2014. "Entorno virtual de aprendizaje y resultados académicos: evidencia empírica para la enseñanza de la Contabilidad de Gestión," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 108-115.
    8. Janik Ole Wecks & Johannes Voshaar & Benedikt Jost Plate & Jochen Zimmermann, 2024. "Generative AI Usage and Exam Performance," Papers 2404.19699, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    9. Harrington, Donna Ramirez & Kulasekera, Kumuduni & Bates, Rick & Bredahl, Maury E., 2006. "Determinants of Student Performance in an Undergraduate Financial Accounting Class," Working Papers 34117, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    10. Jean Ingersoll Abbott & Barry R. Palatnik, 2018. "Students’ perceptions of their first accounting class: implications for instructors," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 72-93, January.
    11. Denis Are?an & Lauren?iu Gabriel ?îru, 2022. "Students satisfaction with the online teaching process," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 25, pages 184-193, January.
    12. Debbie Delaney & Lisa McManus & Chew Ng, 2015. "First Year Accounting Students’ Perceptions Of Blended Learning," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 9-23.
    13. Vincent Bicudo de Castro & Bhavani Sridharan & Kim Watty & Maryam Safari, 2021. "The impact of learner engagement on performance outcomes: a longitudinal study in accounting education," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1639-1664, April.
    14. McCarthy, Mary & Kusaila, Michelle & Grasso, Lawrence, 2019. "Intermediate accounting and auditing: Does course delivery mode impact student performance?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 26-42.
    15. Jade Jansen & Badrunessa Williams & Azmatullah Latief, 2022. "The Motives, Expectations and Preparedness of Learners Embarking on An Undergraduate Accounting Degree in South Africa," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 210-210, October.
    16. Yilmaz Guney, 2009. "Exogenous and Endogenous Factors Influencing Students' Performance in Undergraduate Accounting Modules," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 51-73.
    17. Emine Yilmaz Karakoc, 2016. "The Role of Ethical Sensitivity and Self-Esteem on Academic Performance in Accounting Course," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 4(2), pages 95-105.
    18. Reza M. Monem, 2007. "Does access to tutorial solutions enhance student performance? Evidence from an accounting course," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 47(1), pages 123-142, March.
    19. Keller, J. Howard & Hassell, John M. & Webber, Sally A. & Johnson, James N., 2009. "A comparison of academic performance in traditional and hybrid sections of introductory managerial accounting," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 147-154.
    20. Seung Jae Lee & Hyunae Lee & Taegoo Terry Kim, 2018. "A Study on the Instructor Role in Dealing with Mixed Contents: How It Affects Learner Satisfaction and Retention in e-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joaced:v:32:y:2014:i:1:p:88-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-accounting-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.