IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxvy2022i1p657-669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Managers’ Approach to Legalization of CSR: A Cross-cultural Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Napiorkowska

Abstract

Purpose: In recent years, there has been a shift in the CSR approach, from voluntary action to regulations and legal acts imposing specific obligations on enterprises in terms of their responsibility toward communities and environment in which they operate. Researchers are still divided, but there are rising voices that the adoption of CSR principles is no longer a matter of voluntary practice. The aim of this article is to answer two research questions: 1) what is the managers’ attitude to the legalization of CSR, and 2) are there any differences in this issue across cultures. The study shows the cross-cultural perspective from the EMEA region. Design/Methodology/Approach: A qualitative approach and individual interviews have been chosen to gather reliable and in-depth information. Semi-structured, online interviews with six managers from EMEA region (three Polish citizens and three Tunisian citizens operating in the United Arab Emirates) were selected as the primary technique for data collection. Recorded and transcribed interviews were then analyzed using MAXQDA. Findings: In Poland, where CSR is more institutionalized, managers are skeptical about the obligatory nature of this concept. In the UAE on the other hand, where CSR regulations are still lacking, imposing new obligations on enterprises is seen as a positive and even necessary phenomenon. Practical Implications: Managers' approach to CSR can be universal across the globe, but there is a significant difference how this concept is understood across cultures. Results of this study show a significant difference between managers’ approach to legalization of CSR in Poland and the UAE and can contribute to a better alignment of national and international CSR regulations. Originality/Value: The ambiguity of the results presented in the literature indicates the need for further research on the leaders’ concern for responsibility, sustainability and its legalization. Furthermore, the literature lacks cross-cultural studies on managers’ attitudes toward voluntary vs. mandatory CSR.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Napiorkowska, 2022. "The Managers’ Approach to Legalization of CSR: A Cross-cultural Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 657-669.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxv:y:2022:i:1:p:657-669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2879/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaprak Anadol & Mohamed A. Youssef & Eappen Thiruvattal, 2015. "Consumer reaction towards corporate social responsibility in United Arab Emirates," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 19-35, March.
    2. Jane Claydon, 2011. "A new direction for CSR: the shortcomings of previous CSR models and the rationale for a new model," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 405-420, August.
    3. repec:eme:srjpps:v:6:y:2010:i:2:p:405-420 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Silke Eisenbeiß & Felix Brodbeck, 2014. "Ethical and Unethical Leadership: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Sectoral Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 343-359, June.
    5. Besley, Timothy & Ghatak, Maitreesh, 2007. "Retailing public goods: The economics of corporate social responsibility," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(9), pages 1645-1663, September.
    6. Belaid Rettab & Anis Brik & Kamel Mellahi, 2009. "A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 371-390, October.
    7. Reinhard Steurer, 2010. "The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: characterising public policies on CSR in Europe," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 43(1), pages 49-72, March.
    8. Shallini Taneja & Pawan Taneja & Rajen Gupta, 2011. "Researches in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Shifting Focus, Paradigms, and Methodologies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 343-364, July.
    9. Fernanda Duarte, 2010. "Working with Corporate Social Responsibility in Brazilian Companies: The Role of Managers’ Values in the Maintenance of CSR Cultures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 355-368, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantine Manasakis & Evangelos Mitrokostas & Emmanuel Petrakis, 2015. "Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility by Multinational Enterprises," Working Papers 1501, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    2. Cristian R. Loza Adaui, 2020. "Sustainability Reporting Quality of Peruvian Listed Companies and the Impact of Regulatory Requirements of Sustainability Disclosures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Banjo Roxas & Alan Coetzer, 2012. "Institutional Environment, Managerial Attitudes and Environmental Sustainability Orientation of Small Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(4), pages 461-476, December.
    4. Shaymaa El-Said Salem, 2019. "The Role of Dubai Government in Supporting Responsible and Sustainable Practices of the Private Sector: A Case Study on the Dubai Chamber of Commerce and Industry," Proceedings of the 15th International RAIS Conference, November 6-7, 2019 014SS, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    5. Jamali, Dima & Jain, Tanusree & Samara, Georges & Zoghbi, Edwina, 2020. "How institutions affect CSR practices in the Middle East and North Africa: A critical review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    6. Meera Al-Marri & Ashly H. Pinnington, 2022. "Managing Sustainability Projects for Social Impact from a Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Ana Nave & João Ferreira, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility strategies: Past research and future challenges," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 885-901, July.
    8. Lin-Hi, Nick & Müller, Karsten, 2013. "The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1928-1936.
    9. Michał Jurek, 2014. "The genesis and evolution of CSR self-regulation with special refer-ence to the case of financial institutions," Working papers wpaper70, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    10. Slobodan Marić & Nemanja Berber & Agneš Slavić & Marko Aleksić, 2021. "The Mediating Role of Employee Commitment in the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in Serbia," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    11. Luca Gandullia & Stefano Piserà, 2020. "Do income taxes affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from European‐listed companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1017-1027, March.
    12. Takuma Kimura & Mizuki Nishikawa, 2018. "Ethical Leadership and Its Cultural and Institutional Context: An Empirical Study in Japan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 707-724, September.
    13. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    14. Luciano Fanti & Domenico Buccella, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility in a game-theoretic context," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(3), pages 371-390, September.
    15. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    16. Alberto Galasso & Mihkel Tombak, 2014. "Switching to Green: The Timing of Socially Responsible Innovation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 669-691, September.
    17. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Working Papers 267, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    18. Alice Martini, 2019. "Socially responsible investing: from the ethical origins to the sustainable development framework of the european union," Public Finance Research Papers 36, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
    19. Becchetti, Leonardo & Palestini, Arsen & Solferino, Nazaria & Elisabetta Tessitore, M., 2014. "The socially responsible choice in a duopolistic market: A dynamic model of “ethical product” differentiation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 114-123.
    20. B. S. Choudri & Mahad Baawain & Khalifa Al-Zeidi & Hamood Al-Nofli & Rashid Al-Busaidi & Khalifa Al-Fazari, 2017. "Citizen perception on environmental responsibility of the corporate sector in rural areas," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 2565-2576, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Voluntary CSR; mandatory CSR; regulation; policy; managers’ approach.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M38 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxv:y:2022:i:1:p:657-669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.