IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024ispecialbp573-589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Official Revenues from Agritourism in Italy and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Jeczmyk
  • Roma Rys-Jurek

Abstract

Purpose: The main aim of this article is to compare the official revenues from agritourism and their determinants for Italian and Polish farms. It answers the following questions: How significant were agritourism revenues related to farm net income for farms in Italy and Poland in 2004-2022? How much does the size of the farm (measured by economic size) affect the revenues from agritourism? What is the relationship between Italian and Polish agritourism revenues and other production, economic and financial categories, and do the results for these two countries differ? Design/Methodology/Approach: The research is based on data for Italian and Polish farms from the FADN (RICA) database. We used all available data from the years 2004-2022. The panel data models are estimated. Findings: Revenues from agritourism are not high according to official data but depend on the economic size of the farm. After conducting panel regression, it turns out that the revenues from agritourism in Italy depend on the utilised agricultural areas and subsidies. However, in Poland, they depend on the total output and inputs. The models are distorted because agritourism farms do not show complete revenues from agritourism. It should be assumed that most of these revenues are non-invoiced. Practical Implications: The official revenues from agritourism is not a significant source of income for farms in Italy and in Poland. The practical implications provide actionable insights for policymakers, farmers, and rural development organizations, emphasizing the potential of agritourism to support economic sustainability in rural areas. Originality/Value: Our article makes several significant contributions to the literature on agritourism, especially in the context of Poland and Italy. Our article provides a unique comparative analysis between two countries with different approaches to agritourism regulation. In doing so, it shows the impact of regulatory and cultural diversity on income from this activity. This is a valuable contribution, as it allows us to understand how different legal systems and state support can shape the scope and potential of agritourism as a source of income. The article analyses the impact of factors such as the economic size of the farm, subsidies, total farm product and agricultural area on agritourism income. We have identified revenue underestimation, which shows the problem of under-registration of revenues from agritourism, especially in Poland.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Jeczmyk & Roma Rys-Jurek, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Official Revenues from Agritourism in Italy and Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special B), pages 573-589.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:specialb:p:573-589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3663/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Zanetti & Milena Verrascina & Francesco Licciardo & Giuseppe Gargano, 2022. "Agritourism and Farms Diversification in Italy: What Have We Learnt from COVID-19?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Jibin Baby & Dae-Young Kim, 2024. "Sustainable Agritourism for Farm Profitability: Comprehensive Evaluation of Visitors’ Intrinsic Motivation, Environmental Behavior, and Satisfaction," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Tew, Christine & Barbieri, Carla, 2012. "The perceived benefits of agritourism: The provider’s perspective," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 215-224.
    4. Jan Zawadka & Anna Jęczmyk & Monika Małgorzata Wojcieszak-Zbierska & Gniewko Niedbała & Jarosław Uglis & Joanna Pietrzak-Zawadka, 2022. "Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Agritourism Farm Stays and Their Safety during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Gil Arroyo, Claudia & Barbieri, Carla & Rozier Rich, Samantha, 2013. "Defining agritourism: A comparative study of stakeholders' perceptions in Missouri and North Carolina," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 39-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yung-Lun Liu & Jui-Te Chiang & Pen-Fa Ko, 2023. "The benefits of tourism for rural community development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Brune, Sara & Knollenberg, Whitney & Vilá, Olivia, 2023. "Agritourism resilience during the COVID-19 crisis," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Lucyna Przezborska-Skobiej & Roma Rys-Jurek, 2024. "Revenues from Agritourism and their Determinants for the European Farms," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 905-920.
    4. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    5. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Fabio A. Madau & Pietro Pulina, 2019. "Recreational Services Provision and Farm Diversification: A Technical Efficiency Analysis on Italian Agritourism," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Dubois, Charline & Cawley, Mary & Schmitz, Serge, 2017. "The tourist on the farm: A ‘muddled’ image," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 298-311.
    7. Thomas Streifeneder & Christian Hoffmann & Philipp Corradini, 2023. "The future of agritourism? A review of current trends of touristic commercialisation in rural areas," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(1), pages 93-119, August.
    8. M. Farzana Halim & Carla Barbieri & Duarte B. Morais & Susan Jakes & Erin Seekamp, 2020. "Beyond Economic Earnings: The Holistic Meaning of Success for Women in Agritourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Cinzia Raso & Bruno Antonio Pansera & Antonio Violi, 2020. "Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Jing Li & Carla Barbieri, 2020. "Demystifying Members’ Social Capital and Networks within an Agritourism Association: A Social Network Analysis," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Agnès Durrande-Moreau & François Courvoisier & Anne-Marie Bocquet, 2017. "The new integrated agritourism, a sustainable tourism trend [Le nouvel agritourisme intégré, une tendance du tourisme durable]," Post-Print hal-01555233, HAL.
    12. Khairabadi, Omid & Sajadzadeh, Hassan & Mohammadianmansoor, Saheb, 2020. "Assessment and evaluation of tourism activities with emphasis on agritourism: The case of simin region in Hamedan City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano & Barbieri, Carla, 2015. "On the demand for agritourism: a cursory review of methodologies and practice," MPRA Paper 68177, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Fabio A. Madau & Pietro Pulina, 2021. "Economic performance of agritourism: an analysis of farms located in a less favoured area in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Schilling, Brian J. & Attavanich, Witsanu & Jin, Yanhong, 2014. "Does Agritourism Enhance Farm Profitability?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 39(01), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Yuxi Luo & Tianren Xiong & Defeng Meng & Anrong Gao & Yan Chen, 2023. "Does the Integrated Development of Agriculture and Tourism Promote Farmers’ Income Growth? Evidence from Southwestern China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, September.
    17. Emilio Chiodo & Andrea Fantini & Lori Dickes & Temitope Arogundade & R. David Lamie & Lucilene Assing & Corinne Stewart & Rita Salvatore, 2019. "Agritourism in Mountainous Regions—Insights from an International Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Marco Tregua & Anna D’Auria & Carla Marano-Marcolini, 2018. "Oleotourism: Local Actors for Local Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Xiaowen Jin & Hao Wu & Jing Zhang & Guangming He, 2021. "Agritourism Development in the USA: The Strategy of the State of Michigan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    20. Flanigan, Sharon & Blackstock, Kirsty & Hunter, Colin, 2014. "Agritourism from the perspective of providers and visitors: a typology-based study," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 394-405.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agritourism; FADN; family farm; Italy; Poland; revenues.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G51 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Household Savings, Borrowing, Debt, and Wealth
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:specialb:p:573-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.