IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i4p837-865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Benchmarking on the Example of Energy Sector Companies in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Lukasz Szydelko
  • Sabina Rokita

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to indicate the possibilities of the application of financial benchmarking in supporting management, on the example of companies from the energy sector in Poland, using descriptive statistics and the TOPSIS method. Design/Methodology/Approach: Achieving the research goal defined in the article requires the use of a comprehensive research approach, carried out in several stages, and combining several research methods. At the beginning, a critical review of the literature on the subject is conducted and the method of reasoning by analogy is used. Then, a financial benchmarking proposal is presented (on the example of companies from the energy sector in Poland) including selecting the subject and object of comparison, collecting external data, calculating indicators and analyzing results using descriptive statistics, the TOPSIS method, and creating appropriate rankings. Research methods such as literature review, reasoning by analogy, Spearman's rank correlation descriptive statistics (mean, median, minimum, maximum, standard deviation, variation coefficient, kurtosis) and TOPSIS method are used in the study. Findings: The analyses carried out indicate large application possibilities in the context of using financial benchmarking in companies from the energy sector. Properly selected areas and indicators in financial benchmarking can support management in additional financial dimensions. This, in turn, translates into more effective creation and implementation of strategies, and an increase in the efficiency of operational management (focused on business processes) in companies from the energy sector. Practical implications: The implementation of financial benchmarking can lead to an improvement in the quality of the management process in companies from the energy sector. Properly selected areas, measures (indicators), methods and objects of comparison in financial benchmarking allow for drawing valuable conclusions (including in the scope of the strengths and weaknesses of the company compared to the competition, inefficient use of resources, inappropriate actions) and setting new directions or methods of development. This allows for improving the process of creating, implementing and monitoring strategies in companies, and increasing the efficiency of operational management (focused on business processes). As a result, these activities lead to an increase in the value of companies from the energy sector for shareholders (including an increase in the capitalization of companies from the energy sector on the stock exchange). Originality: The article presents the possibilities of the application of financial benchmarking in supporting management, using descriptive statistics and the TOPSIS method. The financial benchmarking proposal is based on the example of companies from the energy sector in Poland, but it contains general assumptions that can be implemented in any entity regardless of the sector in which it operates.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukasz Szydelko & Sabina Rokita, 2024. "Financial Benchmarking on the Example of Energy Sector Companies in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 837-865.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:837-865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3552/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bala Krishnamoorthy & Christine D'Lima, 2014. "Benchmarking as a measure of competitiveness," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 342-359.
    2. Diana-Mihaela Pociovalisteanu & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Aurelian Tirca & Walter Leal Filho, 2010. "Trends and challenges in the energy sector of Romania in the post-accession to the European Union," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 3-15.
    3. Saeed Khojaste Effatpanah & Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi & Pasura Aungkulanon & Akbar Maleki & Milad Sadeghzadeh & Mohsen Sharifpur & Lingen Chen, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Five Widely-Used Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Evaluate Clean Energy Technologies: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-33, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walker, Nathan L. & Styles, David & Coughlan, Paul & Williams, A. Prysor, 2022. "Cross-sector sustainability benchmarking of major utilities in the United Kingdom," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Fatih Topaloğlu, 2024. "Development of a new hybrid method for multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach: a case study for facility location selection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Marek Matejun, 2024. "The Ordinariness and Denaturation of Small Business:Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence from the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 187-214.
    4. Grigory Viktorovich Prytkov & Natalia Yurievna Tsvetus & Artem Alexandrovich Balyakin & Andrey Sergeevich Malyshev & Sergey Borisovich Taranenko, 2017. "Scientific Cooperation between Russia and the EU in the Development and Use of Large Research Infrastructure," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 338-353.
    5. Olga Bergal, 2020. "Innovative Energy Clusters' Infrastructure," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 361-376.
    6. Anis Chariri & Indira Januarti, 2017. "Audit Committee Characteristics and Integrated Reporting:Empirical Study of Companies Listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 305-318.
    7. Isabella Damdinovna Elyakova & Aleksandr Andreyevich Khristoforov & Aleksandr Lvovich Elyakov & Larisa Ivanovna Danilova & Tamara Aleksandrovna Karataeva & Elena Vladimirovna Danilova, 2017. "Forecast Scenarios of World Prices for Natural Gas," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 284-297.
    8. Sabina Rokita & Lukasz Szydelko, 2024. "Innovation of Enterprises in Poland by Voivodeship in the Years 2018-2022," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1266-1287.
    9. Wieslawa Caputa & Izabela Krawczyk-Sokolowska & Artur Pazdzior, 2024. "Customer Capital as the Driving Force of the Energy Transformation of the Polish Economy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special B), pages 362-378.
    10. Valentin Marian Antohi & Monica Laura Zlati & Romeo Victor Ionescu & Marius Sorin Dinca & Costinela Fortea, 2024. "Analysing the Disruptive Effect of Economic Downturns on Stock Market Crashes in European Financial Markets," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 383-396.
    11. Habib, Maan, 2020. "Developing a sustainability strategy for multipurpose cadastre in post-conflict Syria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    12. Mahjus Ekananda & Dion Jogi Parlinggoman, 2017. "The Role of High-Tech Exports and of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) on Economic Growth," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 194-212.
    13. Rafal Czyzycki & Konrad Kochanski, 2023. "Regional Differences in Energy Policy Changes of EU Countries in 2012-2021," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 492-499.
    14. Anna A. Bakulina & Olga V. Panina & Stanislav E. Prokofiev & Natalia L. Krasyukova & Valery L. Abramov & Natalia V. Sergeeva & Olga V. Loseva & Tatiana G. Kasyanenko & Elena V. Takmakova, 2021. "The Black Sea Region Energy Cooperation: Current Trends and Prospects," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 257-266.
    15. Catherine De La Robertie & Semyon Danilov, 2015. "Methods of Investment Management in the Russian Electricity Transmission Industry," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 21-37.
    16. Katrina Benikovna Dobrova & Nadezhda Grigorevna Danilochkina & Natalia Vladimirovna Cherner & Victor Petrovich Dobrov & Peter Petrovich Dobrov & Ekaterina Nikolaevna Sepiashvili, 2018. "Innovational Management of Industrial Enterprises in the Energy Sector," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 447-458.
    17. Krishankumar, Raghunathan & Pamucar, Dragan & Deveci, Muhammat & Aggarwal, Manish & Ravichandran, Kattur Soundarapandian, 2022. "Assessment of renewable energy sources for smart cities’ demand satisfaction using multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic based choquet integral approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1428-1442.
    18. Aleksander Wasiuta, 2024. "Progress and Disparity: A Decade of Renewable Energy Development in Europe," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 350-364.
    19. Natalya Aleksandrovna Rubtsova & Anna Vitalievna Baychik & Sergey Borisovich Nikonov & Natalia Vladimirovna Bakirova & Tatiana Valerievna Belenkova, 2017. "Structural Models of the Consumer Goods Industry in China, Turkey and Italy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 632-650.
    20. Zhanarys S. Raimbekov & Bakyt U. Syzdykbayeva & Kamshat P. Mussina & Luiza P. Moldashbayeva & Bakytzhamal A. Zhumataeva, 2017. "The Study of the Logistics Development Effectiveness in the Eurasian Economic Union Countries and Measures to Improve it," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 260-276.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial benchmarking; financial indicators; management; strategy; energy industry.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:837-865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.