IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i4p1266-1287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation of Enterprises in Poland by Voivodeship in the Years 2018-2022

Author

Listed:
  • Sabina Rokita
  • Lukasz Szydelko

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to analyze the innovativeness of service and industrial enterprises in Poland, cross-sectionally by voivodeships, in the years 2018-2022, using the TOPSIS method. Design/Methodology/Approach: The literature review focuses, in particular, on the essence of innovation, factors influencing the level of innovation and the measurement of innovation. The analysis of the innovativeness of industrial and service enterprises in Poland by voivodeships, in the years 2018-2022, was carried out based on data from Statistics Poland. Four indicators were selected for the analysis of innovativeness, including: 2 input indicators and 2 output indicators. Based on the selected indicators, synthetic measures on the input and output side were calculated using the TOPSIS method, and then rankings of the innovativeness of industrial and service enterprises by voivodeships were prepared. Research methods such as literature review, variability analysis, Spearman's rank correlation, and TOPSIS method were used in the study. Findings: The innovativeness of industrial and service enterprises in Poland by voivodeship can be measured using various measures. The measures based on inputs and outputs are worth noting in this respect, with the use of which synthetic measures were calculated using the TOPSIS methodand rankings were created. Based on the analyses conducted, it was found that in the groups of industrial and service enterprises, in the period 2018-2022, the share of innovation-active enterprises was significantly higher than the share of enterprises that incurred expenditures on R&D activities. In the period under review, a slight upward trend was also noticeable in the share of enterprises incurring R&D expenditures in both groups studied. Moreover, in the group of industrial enterprises there was a higher percentage of those that were innovation-active and those that incurred expenditure on R&D activities than in the group of service enterprises. The research indicates that the largest percentage of industrial and service enterprises introduced new or improved business processes in the 2018-2022 period. In turn, a much smaller percentage of enterprises were introducing new or improved products. The share of enterprises that introduced innovative products was higher in the group of inThalassinosdustrial enterprises than in the group of service enterprises. In 2020-2022, the share of service enterprises that introduced innovative business processes was higher than the share of industrial enterprises. It is worth noting that enterprises from a given voivodeship could occupy different places in the rankings in particular years, as well as according to inputs and outputs. The study also shows that there are very large application possibilities of multidimensional comparative analyses using rankings in assessing the innovativeness of enterprises. Thanks to this, it is possible, among other things, to use the results of the analyses in various spheres of management. Practical implications: The Polish government can use the conclusions from the regional analysis of the innovativeness of industrial and service enterprises to allocate funds for programs supporting the innovativeness of enterprises in individual voivodeships. The authorities in these individual voivodeships can determine their position in the area of innovativeness in relation to other regions based on the rankings. On the other hand, enterprise managers can find the regions (voivodeships) most supportive of the innovativeness of enterprises based on the results obtained. Originality: The originality manifests itself primarily in the comprehensiveness and scope of the research undertaken, in particular in the approach to the innovativeness of industrial and service enterprises across voivodeships, from the perspective of inputs and outputs, and the preparation of rankings on this basis using the TOPSIS method.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabina Rokita & Lukasz Szydelko, 2024. "Innovation of Enterprises in Poland by Voivodeship in the Years 2018-2022," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1266-1287.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:1266-1287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3569/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karel HavlÃ­Ä ek & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Liliana Berezkinova, 2013. "Innovation Management and Controlling in SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 57-70.
    2. M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Juan Piñeiro-Chousa & Lara Quiñoá-Piñeiro, 2021. "An approach to a country's innovation considering cultural, economic, and social conditions," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 2747-2766, January.
    3. Saeed Khojaste Effatpanah & Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi & Pasura Aungkulanon & Akbar Maleki & Milad Sadeghzadeh & Mohsen Sharifpur & Lingen Chen, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Five Widely-Used Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Evaluate Clean Energy Technologies: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-33, January.
    4. Bischoff, Thore Sören & Hipp, Ann & Runst, Petrik, 2023. "Firm innovation and generalized trust as a regional resource," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    5. repec:ers:journl:v:xvi:y:2013:i:sisme:p:57-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladimir Yuryevich Morozov & Yulia Vladimirovna Murashova & Tatyana Nikolaevna Lustina & Aleksandra Georgiyevna Panova & Veronika Andreevna Danilova, 2017. "Formation of Human Resource Management System in Organizations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2A), pages 408-421.
    2. Fatih Topaloğlu, 2024. "Development of a new hybrid method for multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach: a case study for facility location selection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Simon Grima & Gani Asllani & Jonathan Spiteri & Nikson Daka, 2019. "The Cost and Information Management Effect in SMEs: An Empirical Analysis," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 360-369.
    4. Olga Viktorovna Zabelina & Farida Islamudinovna Mirzabalaeva & Larisa Viktorovna Sankova & Gulnara Vahitovna Yakshibaeva, 2017. "Labor Potential of the Rural Territories - State and Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 261-282.
    5. Domenico Raucci & Dominique Lepore, 2020. "A Simplified Activity-Based Costing Approach for SMEs: The Case Study of an Italian Small Road Company," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 198-214.
    6. G.N. Khubaev & I.Yu. Shpolianskaya & A.I. Dolzhenko & S.M. Scherbakov & E.N. Efimov, 2017. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Management Information Systems for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: a User Satisfaction Approach," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 116-129.
    7. Dorota Grego-Planer & Agnieszka Kus, 2020. "Determinants of Innovation Activities in Small Enterprises: A Model Approach," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 137-148.
    8. David Mares & Nadazda Petra, 2018. "Stabilization Factors of Family Enterprises in the Context of Macroeconomic Performance," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 206-220.
    9. Ramona Rupeika-Apoga & Irina Solovjova, 2017. "Access to Finance for Latvian SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 57-68.
    10. Pawel Rymarczyk & Cezary Figura & Lukasz Wojciechowski & Kamila Cwik & Piotr Stalinski, 2024. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Advertising Campaigns in the Fast-Food Industry Using an Analytical Engine," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special A), pages 126-136.
    11. Dubrova T.A. & Ermolina A.A. & Esenin M.A., 2019. "Innovative Activities of SMEs in Russia: Constraints and Growth Factors," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 2), pages 26-40.
    12. Marek Ciekanowski & Slawomir Żurawski & Zbigniew Ciekanowski & Yury Pauliuchuk & Jan Boguski, 2023. "The Impact of Digitalization and the COVID-19 Pandemic on Information Security Management in the Enterprise," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 750-763.
    13. V.M. Dzhukha & A.N. Kokin & A.S. Li & T.Yu. Sinyuk, 2017. "Research and Development Intensity in Business: Russia and EU," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 64-76.
    14. Prof. Dr. Ion Criveanu & Dr. Ec. Loredana Iordache, 2015. "Establishing Human Resources Strategies and Policies Correlating with Company's Objectives," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 3-10.
    15. T.L. Bezrukova & Yu.N. Stepanova & I.I. Shanin & Yu.V. Busarina & S.Yu. Nesterov, 2017. "Aspect-Oriented, Key-Index Based Regional Business Entities' Evaluation Framework," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 183-192.
    16. Yu.P. Maidanevych & T.S. Romanishina & L.E. Rysakova & N.G. Bondarenko & O.V. Mihailuk, 2018. "Investment Instruments to Stimulate Depressed Regions’ Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 476-488.
    17. A.I. Belousov & E.A. Shelukhina & N.A. Rumachik & A.N. Shchemelev, 2017. "Adaptation of Balance Theories to the Assessment of Sustainable Economic Development of Business Units," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 76-83.
    18. Farichah Farichah, 2017. "Management Compensation and Auditor Reputation on Earnings Management and on Share Returns," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 196-208.
    19. Eddy Soeryanto Soegoto, 2018. "Effective Enterprise Communication and Learning Attitude in Business Performance: A Case Study on SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 55-68.
    20. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:342-350 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Nikolaos G. Theriou, 2015. "Strategic Management Process and the Importance of Structured Formality, Financial and Non-Financial Information," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 3-28.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovations; enterprise innovation; innovation measurement; voivodeships.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • R59 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:1266-1287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.