IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial4p143-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating Reliable and Resilient Logistics Organizations for Unpredictable Conditions and Unexpected Future

Author

Listed:
  • Lech A. Bukowski
  • Pawel Sobczak

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this paper is to develop a general concept for creating resilient logistics organizations under the deep uncertainty that arises from unpredictable conditions and unexpected future, and to integrate it with a framework for ensuring the reliable operation of these organizations under conditions of predictable change. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research methodology was based on a transdisciplinary approach because logistics organizations have the nature of complex systems with different types of systems such as physical, cybernetic and social ones. The research approach used is based on a critical analysis of the literature and case studies from the authors' own experience. The research is supported by Ackoff's 'idealized design' approach and assumptions from The IRGC Risk Governance Framework. Findings: It was found that complex logistics organizations can be successfully modelled as Engineered System of Systems and managed according to the principles applicable to such systems. Furthermore, it was shown that it is possible to combine two different concepts, namely High Reliability Organization and Resilient Enterprise, into one coherent whole in the form of a Reliable and Resilient Logistics Organization. Practical Implications: For practical use of the developed concept, a framework was designed in the form of an algorithm describing the process of creating Reliable and Resilient Logistics Organization in the form of successive stages of action and decisions. Originality/value: The concept of the Reliable and Resilient Logistics Organization is wholly original and is the result of many years of our research into the behavior of complex socio-technical systems under uncertainty. The added value of the work is the model developed, which in the form of a framework can be used in practice in logistics organizations to ensure their continuous and effective operation under various conditions, both predictable and unpredictable changes in the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Lech A. Bukowski & Pawel Sobczak, 2021. "Creating Reliable and Resilient Logistics Organizations for Unpredictable Conditions and Unexpected Future," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 143-161.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special4:p:143-161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2588/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miklos Pakurar & Istvan Andras Kun & Janos Felföldi & Laszlo Vasa & Judit Olah, 2020. "Integration of Logistics Function and Business Performance," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 567-583.
    2. Agnieszka Jagoda & Tomasz Kolakowski & Jakub Marcinkowski, 2020. "Project Teams as a Supply Chain Integration Tool," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 1160-1177.
    3. Pfohl, Hans-Christian, 2016. "Logistikmanagement: Konzeption und Funktionen," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 106052, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Bukowski, L., 2016. "System of systems dependability – Theoretical models and applications examples," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 76-92.
    5. Judyta Kabus & Ireneusz Miciula & Luiza Piersiala, 2020. "Risk in Supply Chain Management," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 467-480.
    6. E. Kulinska & J. Giera & K. Smaga, 2020. "Analysis of Risk Factors in an Indirect Distribution Channel," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 176-185.
    7. Fikret Berkes, 2007. "Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 41(2), pages 283-295, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongdeng Lei & Jing’ai Wang & Yaojie Yue & Hongjian Zhou & Weixia Yin, 2014. "Rethinking the relationships of vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation from a disaster risk perspective," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(1), pages 609-627, January.
    2. Ana Raquel Nunes, 2021. "Exploring the interactions between vulnerability, resilience and adaptation to extreme temperatures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2261-2293, December.
    3. Busby, Joshua & Smith, Todd G. & Krishnan, Nisha & Wight, Charles & Vallejo-Gutierrez, Santiago, 2018. "In harm's way: Climate security vulnerability in Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 88-118.
    4. J. Park & T. P. Seager & P. S. C. Rao & M. Convertino & I. Linkov, 2013. "Integrating Risk and Resilience Approaches to Catastrophe Management in Engineering Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 356-367, March.
    5. Ming-Kuang Chung & Dau-Jye Lu & Bor-Wen Tsai & Kuei-Tien Chou, 2019. "Assessing Effectiveness of PPGIS on Protected Areas by Governance Quality: A Case Study of Community-Based Monitoring in Wu-Wei-Kang Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Florence Jacquet & A Aboul-Naga & Bernard Hubert, 2020. "The contribution of ARIMNet to address livestock systems resilience in the Mediterranean region," Post-Print hal-03625860, HAL.
    7. Liang Zhao & Gaofeng Xu & Yan Cui & Feng Kong & Huina Gao & Xia Zhou, 2023. "Post-Disaster Restoration and Reconstruction Assessment of the Jiuzhaigou Lake Landscape and a Resilience Development Pathway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Ríos-Núñez, Sandra M. & Coq-Huelva, Daniel & García-Trujillo, Roberto, 2013. "The Spanish livestock model: A coevolutionary analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 342-350.
    9. Tzu-Chieh Lin & Kung Jeng Wang, 2021. "Project-based maturity assessment model for smart transformation in Taiwanese enterprises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Eichhorn Colombo, Konrad W., 2023. "Financial resilience analysis of floating production, storage and offloading plant operated in Norwegian Arctic region: Case study using inter-/transdisciplinary system dynamics modeling and simulatio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    11. Brune, Sara & Vilá, Olivia & Knollenberg, Whitney, 2023. "Family farms' resilience under the COVID-19 crisis: Challenges and opportunities with agritourism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    12. Alton C. Byers & Mohan Bahadur Chand & Jonathan Lala & Milan Shrestha & Elizabeth A. Byers & Teiji Watanabe, 2020. "Reconstructing the History of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOF) in the Kanchenjunga Conservation Area, East Nepal: An Interdisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Kuang-Chung Lee & Paulina G. Karimova & Shao-Yu Yan & Yee-Shien Li, 2020. "Resilience Assessment Workshops: A Biocultural Approach to Conservation Management of a Rural Landscape in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    14. C. Ordóñez & P. Duinker, 2015. "Climate change vulnerability assessment of the urban forest in three Canadian cities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(4), pages 531-543, August.
    15. Kathryn J. Bowen & Sharon Friel & Kristie Ebi & Colin D. Butler & Fiona Miller & Anthony J. McMichael, 2011. "Governing for a Healthy Population: Towards an Understanding of How Decision-Making Will Determine Our Global Health in a Changing Climate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Shukui Tan & Haipeng Song & Ghulam Akhmat & Javeed Hussain, 2014. "Governing Harmonious Human Engagement with the Spatial Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Antonio Adrián Arciénaga Morales & Janni Nielsen & Hernán Alberto Bacarini & Silvia Irene Martinelli & Sergio Takeo Kofuji & Juan Francisco García Díaz, 2018. "Technology and Innovation Management in Higher Education—Cases from Latin America and Europe," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-34, April.
    18. Frank Biermann & Michele Betsill & Joyeeta Gupta & Norichika Kanie & Louis Lebel & Diana Liverman & Heike Schroeder & Bernd Siebenhüner & Ruben Zondervan, 2010. "Earth system governance: a research framework," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 277-298, December.
    19. Torres, Cati & Faccioli, Michela & Riera Font, Antoni, 2017. "Waiting or acting now? The effect on willingness-to-pay of delivering inherent uncertainty information in choice experiments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 231-240.
    20. Elvis Parraguez-Vergara & Jonathan R. Barton & Gabriela Raposo-Quintana, 2016. "Impacts of Climate Change in the Andean Foothills of Chile: Economic and Cultural Vulnerability of Indigenous Mapuche Livelihoods," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 32(4), pages 454-483, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Logistics organization; reliability; resilience; governance; deep uncertainty.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special4:p:143-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.