IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i4bp397-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Productivity in Europe: Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Index Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Rusielik

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to measure and analyse the productivity level of agricultural activity in 25 European Union countries and to analyse the factors influencing this level. Approach/Methodology/Design: The data covers the years 2009-2019 and was obtained from the EUROSTAT database. Aggregated Hicks-Moorsteen TFP total productivity indices were used for measurement and analysis. On the basis of the average productivity level, countries were grouped into groups based on the analysis of their position in the productivity index quartiles. Findings: European agriculture is diversified in terms of productivity. The level of productivity and its changes are determined, on the one hand, by changes in the level of effectiveness and, on the other hand, by changes in technology. The decomposition of productivity indices allows you to find these determinants. Practical Implications: The performed analysis allowed for grouping the surveyed countries in terms of the productivity of agricultural activity. The decomposition of productivity indices made it possible to find determinants of this productivity. The performed analysis can be used as one of the criteria for allocating funds to implement reforms and policies related to European agriculture. The results also make it possible to identify possible sources of increasing the level of productivity. Originality/Value: The presented research enriches the knowledge on agricultural productivity in the European Union. In addition, Hicks-Moorsteen total productivity indices were used, which are rarely found in publications in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Rusielik, 2021. "Agricultural Productivity in Europe: Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Index Analysis," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 397-409.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4b:p:397-409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2664/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lajos Baráth & Imre Fertő, 2017. "Productivity and Convergence in European Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 228-248, February.
    2. Xueqin Zhu & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2010. "Impact of CAP Subsidies on Technical Efficiency of Crop Farms in Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 545-564, September.
    3. Latruffe, Laure & Fogarasi, József & Desjeux, Yann, 2012. "Efficiency, productivity and technology comparison for farms in Central and Western Europe: The case of field crop and dairy farming in Hungary and France," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 264-278.
    4. Fare, Rolf & Shawna Grosskopf & Mary Norris & Zhongyang Zhang, 1994. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(1), pages 66-83, March.
    5. Johan Swinnen & Liesbet Vranken, 2010. "Reforms and agricultural productivity in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Republics: 1989–2005," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 241-258, June.
    6. Hoang, Viet-Ngu, 2011. "Measuring and decomposing changes in agricultural productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and cumulative exergy efficiency: Application to OECD agriculture," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 164-175.
    7. Quiroga, Sonia & Suárez, Cristina & Fernández-Haddad, Zaira & Philippidis, George, 2017. "Levelling the playing field for European Union agriculture: Does the Common Agricultural Policy impact homogeneously on farm productivity and efficiency?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 179-188.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marzec, Jerzy & Pisulewski, Andrzej, 2019. "The Measurement of Time Varying Technical Efficiency and Productivity Change in Polish Crop Farms," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(1), March.
    2. Khafagy, Amr & Vigani, Mauro, 2022. "Technical change and the Common Agricultural Policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Rusielik, Robert, 2021. "Agricultural Efficiency And Its Components In European Union Countries Between 2009-2019. Analysis Using Aggregate Färe-Primont Productivity Indices," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2021(3).
    4. Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2014. "Comparing Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indices: Exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 749-758.
    5. Lukas Cechura & Aaron Grau & Heinrich Hockmann & Inna Levkovych & Zdenka Kroupova, 2017. "Catching Up or Falling Behind in European Agriculture: The Case of Milk Production," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 206-227, February.
    6. Dakpo, K Hervé & Desjeux, Yann & Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Productivity, efficiency and technological change in French agriculture during 2002-2014: A Färe-Primont index decomposition," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 244793, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Götz, Linde & Hockmann, Heinrich & Glauben, Thomas, 2017. "Determinants of productivity and efficiency of wheat production in Kazakhstan: A Stochastic Frontier Approach," IAMO Discussion Papers 253397, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    8. Arjomandi, Amir & Valadkhani, Abbas & O’Brien, Martin, 2014. "Analysing banks’ intermediation and operational performance using the Hicks–Moorsteen TFP index: The case of Iran," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 111-125.
    9. Sokol, Ondřej & Frýd, Lukáš, 2023. "DEA efficiency in agriculture: Measurement unit issues," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. K Hervé Dakpo & Philippe Jeanneaux & Laure Latruffe & Claire Mosnier & Patrick Veysset, 2018. "Three decades of productivity change in French beef production: a Färe‐Primont index decomposition," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(3), pages 352-372, July.
    11. Dakpo, K Hervé & Desjeux, Yann & Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe , Laure, 2017. "Productivity, technical efficiency and technological change in French agriculture during 2002-2014: A Färe-Primont index decomposition," Working Papers 263010, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    12. Jerzy Marzec & Andrzej Pisulewski, 2017. "The Effect of CAP Subsidies on the Technical Efficiency of Polish Dairy Farms," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 9(3), pages 243-273, September.
    13. Koiry, Subrata & Huang, Wei, 2023. "Do ecological protection approaches affect total factor productivity change of cropland production in Sweden?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    14. Artiom Volkov & Tomas Balezentis & Mangirdas Morkunas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "In a Search for Equity: Do Direct Payments under the Common Agricultural Policy Induce Convergence in the European Union?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    15. repec:zbw:iamodp:253397 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Mohamed Ghali & Laure Latruffe & Karine Daniel, 2016. "Efficient Use of Energy Resources on French Farms: An Analysis through Technical Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Fertö, Imre, 2014. "The Structural Transformation in Central and Eastern European Agriculture," CEI Working Paper Series 2014-9, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    18. repec:lic:licosd:40918 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Jerzy Marzec & Andrzej Pisulewski, 2020. "Pomiar efektywności zróżnicowanych technologicznie gospodarstw rolnych w Unii Europejskiej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 111-137.
    20. Feng Ye & Lang Wang & Amar Razzaq & Ting Tong & Qing Zhang & Azhar Abbas, 2023. "Policy Impacts of High-Standard Farmland Construction on Agricultural Sustainability: Total Factor Productivity-Based Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    21. Anna Jankowska, 2021. "Convergence in Labour Productivity in Agriculture: A Comparison Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1142-1152.
    22. Quiroga, Sonia & Suarez, Cristina & Ficko, Andrej & Feliciano, Diana & Bouriaud, Laura & Brahic, Elodie & Deuffic, Philippe & Dobsinska, Zuzana & Jarsky, Vilem & Lawrence, Anna & Nybakk, Erlend, 2019. "What influences European private forest owners' affinity for subsidies?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 136-144.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agriculture; agricultural efficiency; TFP total productivity indices; Data Envelopment Analysis; EU-25.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4b:p:397-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.