IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i3bp47-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial Effectiveness in the Implementation of Quick Response Manufacturing (QRM) to Increase Business Agility

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Stronczek

Abstract

Purpose: The competitive and variable business environment forces organizations not only to flexibly adapt to changes, but also to predict them. A desirable capability of an organization is agility, understood as the ease and speed with which companies can reconfigure, redesign and adapt their processes in order to respond to the needs, threats and opportunities. QRM is a management concept that focuses on time as the key factor in competitive manufacturing. The objective of this article is to analyze the effect of QRM implementation on key business agility characteristics. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research methods used to accomplish this goal are literature studies and questionnaire surveys using the agility attributes matrix. Based on literature studies as well as the conducted interviews, a model of the effect of QRM implementation has been developed. Findings: The results obtained show that QRM implementation definitely has an impact on all areas of the company's agility. Practical Implications: The article brings several valuable pieces of information and provides practical tips. The results may be taken advantage of by entrepreneurs. They constitute indications for selecting competition instruments during the crises. Originality/Value: The previous studies on Quick Response Manufacturing (QRM) were conducted in various dimensions, while there is no research linking this method to business agility. It is the first such research.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Stronczek, 2021. "Managerial Effectiveness in the Implementation of Quick Response Manufacturing (QRM) to Increase Business Agility," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 47-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3b:p:47-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2451/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Godinho Filho, Moacir & Marchesini, Antonio Gilberto & Riezebos, Jan & Vandaele, Nico & Ganga, Gilberto Miller Devós, 2017. "The application of Quick Response Manufacturing practices in Brazil, Europe, and the USA: An exploratory study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 437-448.
    2. Gunasekaran, A., 1999. "Design and implementation of agile manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 1-6, May.
    3. Moacir Godinho Filho & Antonio Gilberto Marchesini & Jan Riezebos & Nico Vandaele & Gilberto Miller Devós Ganga, 2017. "The extent of knowledge of Quick Response Manufacturing principles: an exploratory transnational study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(17), pages 4891-4911, September.
    4. Gunasekaran, A., 1999. "Agile manufacturing: A framework for research and development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 87-105, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El-Khalil, Raed & Mezher, Mohamad Ali, 2020. "The mediating impact of sustainability on the relationship between agility and operational performance," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    2. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Lai, Kee-hung & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2008. "Responsive supply chain: A competitive strategy in a networked economy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 549-564, August.
    3. Nina Tura & Lea Hannola & Mikko Pynnönen, 2017. "Agile Methods for Boosting the Commercialization Process of New Technology," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Sujan Piya & Ahm Shamsuzzoha & Mohammad Khadem & Nasr Al-Hinai, 2020. "Identification of Critical Factors and Their Interrelationships to Design Agile Supply Chain: Special Focus to Oil and Gas Industries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 263-281, September.
    5. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson & Cristovao Silva & Silvio Carmo-Silva, 2019. "POLC-A: an assessment of POLCA’s authorization element," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 2435-2447, August.
    6. Schulke, Arne & Jütte, Silke, 2019. "Kann der deutsche Mittelstand "agil"?," IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management 1/2019, IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    7. Bora Ly, 2024. "The Interplay of Digital Transformational Leadership, Organizational Agility, and Digital Transformation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4408-4427, March.
    8. Vaagen, Hajnalka & Wallace, Stein W., 2008. "Product variety arising from hedging in the fashion supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 431-455, August.
    9. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "The Effect of Organizational Agility on Quality of Work Life: A Study on Commercial Banks in Egypt," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 271-271, May.
    10. Madhukar Patil & M. Suresh, 2019. "Modelling the Enablers of Workforce Agility in IoT Projects: A TISM Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(2), pages 157-175, June.
    11. Liu, Min-Ling & Liu, Na-Ting & Ding, Cherng G. & Lin, Chieh-Peng, 2015. "Exploring team performance in high-tech industries: Future trends of building up teamwork," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 295-310.
    12. Liu, Weihua & Long, Shangsong & Wei, Shuang, 2022. "Correlation mechanism between smart technology and smart supply chain innovation performance: A multi-case study from China's companies with Physical Internet," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    13. Wanzhu Wang & Qazi Salman Khalid & Muhammad Abas & Hao Li & Shakir Azim & Abdur Rehman Babar & Waqas Saleem & Razaullah Khan, 2021. "Implementation of POLCA Integrated QRM Framework for Optimized Production Performance—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    15. Brusset, Xavier, 2016. "Does supply chain visibility enhance agility?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 46-59.
    16. Dowlatshahi, Shad & Cao, Qing, 2006. "The relationships among virtual enterprise, information technology, and business performance in agile manufacturing: An industry perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 835-860, October.
    17. Emmanouil Krasanakis & Andreas Symeonidis, 2022. "Fast Library Recommendation in Software Dependency Graphs with Symmetric Partially Absorbing Random Walks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Madhukar Chhimwal & Saurabh Agrawal & Girish Kumar, 2021. "Measuring Circular Supply Chain Risk: A Bayesian Network Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    20. Yoo, Sang Bong & Kim, Yeongho, 2002. "Web-based knowledge management for sharing product data in virtual enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1-2), pages 173-183, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quick Response Manufacturing; QRM; agile; agile production.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3b:p:47-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.