IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i17p4891-4911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The extent of knowledge of Quick Response Manufacturing principles: an exploratory transnational study

Author

Listed:
  • Moacir Godinho Filho
  • Antonio Gilberto Marchesini
  • Jan Riezebos
  • Nico Vandaele
  • Gilberto Miller Devós Ganga

Abstract

The main goal of this research is to identify whether companies that have implemented the Quick Response Manufacturing (QRM) approach have full knowledge of the QRM principles or have merely applied the elements (principles and tools) that have a close relationship with Lean Manufacturing. Based on a review of the literature regarding the QRM principles, an exploratory survey was conducted for over 20 manufacturing companies from Brazil, Europe and the USA that operate in an Engineer or Make to Order environment system and explicitly have conducted QRM journeys. The results of the present study show that (i) the surveyed companies have difficulty knowing and applying some of the exclusive elements of this approach, even if they started implementing QRM several years ago; (ii) the surveyed companies’ knowledge degree over QRM exclusive elements is apparently higher among US-based companies due to better trained employees and better dissemination and awareness of the QRM exclusive elements; and (iii) a mentality based on productivity, low costs and due date delivery was identified as the main barrier for companies to achieve a higher knowledge degree regarding QRM.

Suggested Citation

  • Moacir Godinho Filho & Antonio Gilberto Marchesini & Jan Riezebos & Nico Vandaele & Gilberto Miller Devós Ganga, 2017. "The extent of knowledge of Quick Response Manufacturing principles: an exploratory transnational study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(17), pages 4891-4911, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:17:p:4891-4911
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1268729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2016.1268729
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2016.1268729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fujimoto, Takahiro, 1999. "The Evolution of Manufacturing Systems at Toyota," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195123203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrej Dupaľ & Patrik Richnák & Ľuboslav Szabo & Klaudia Porubanová, 2019. "Modern trends in logistics of agricultural enterprises," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(8), pages 359-365.
    2. Anna Stronczek, 2021. "Managerial Effectiveness in the Implementation of Quick Response Manufacturing (QRM) to Increase Business Agility," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 47-60.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yujiro Hayami, 2009. "Social Capital, Human Capital and the Community Mechanism: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Economists," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 96-123.
    2. Yamamoto, Satoshi & Kan, Viktoriya & Bartnik, Roman, 2018. "Going Abroad to Innovate? The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Foreign Business Expansion for Japanese Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturers," CIS Discussion paper series 668, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    3. Florian Magnani & Valentina Carbone & Valérie Moatti, 2019. "The human dimension of lean: a literature review," Post-Print hal-03349359, HAL.
    4. Joseph O'Mahoney, 2007. "The Diffusion of Management Innovations: The Possibilities and Limitations of Memetics," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(8), pages 1324-1348, December.
    5. Vincent FRIGANT, 2011. "Egyptian pyramid or Aztec pyramid: How should we describe the industrial architecture of automotive supply chains in Europe?," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2011-27, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    6. Krzywdzinski, Martin, 2021. "Lean Production in Germany: A Contested Model," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 507-528.
    7. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk, 2019. "Advancing lean management: The missing quantitative approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    8. Olejniczak Tomasz & Itohisa Masato, 2017. "Hybridization Revisited: New Insights from the Evolutionary Approach," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 43-62, June.
    9. Genjiro Kosaka & Koichi Nakagawa & Seiji Manabe & Mizuki Kobayashi, 2020. "The vertical keiretsu advantage in the era of Westernization in the Japanese automobile industry: investigation from transaction cost economics and a resource-based view," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 36-61, February.
    10. Barbara Fuchs, 2007. "Learning from Toyota: how action learning can foster competitive advantage in new product development (NPD)," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 25-43, April.
    11. Niall Piercy, 2012. "Business history and operations management," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 154-178, August.
    12. Filip Flankegård & Glenn Johansson & Anna Granlund & Peter E. Johansson, 2024. "Conceptualization of Supplier Involvement in Product Development Based on a Systematic Review of 47 Definitions," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Katsuki Aoki & Miriam Wilhelm, 2017. "The Role of Ambidexterity in Managing Buyer–Supplier Relationships: The Toyota Case," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1080-1097, December.
    14. Olejniczak Tomasz & Itohisa Masato & Abo Tetsuo & Kumon Hiroshi, 2018. "Measuring Change in ‘Hybrid Factories’: Longitudinal Study of Japanese Manufacturing Subsidiaries in Poland," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 10(4), pages 109-145, December.
    15. Vincent Frigant & Stéphane Miollan & Maëlise Presse & David Virapin, 2019. "Quelles frontières géographiques pour les systèmes d’innovation technologique ?. Une analyse par les co-brevets appliquée au véhicule à pile à combustible," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 243-273.
    16. Vincent Frigant & Stéphane Miollan & M. Presse, 2016. "Is the Fuel Cell Vehicle’s Technological Innovation System built at a global or national scale? An analysis of carmakers' co-patents’ portfolios," Post-Print hal-02150385, HAL.
    17. Thun, Eric, 2018. "Innovation at the middle of the pyramid: State policy, market segmentation, and the Chinese automotive sector," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 70, pages 7-19.
    18. Vincent FRIGANT, 2011. "French mega-suppliers’ trajectories during the modular era: some evidences on Faurecia, Valeo and Plastic Omnium," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2011-20, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    19. Shumpei Iwao, 2017. "Revisiting the existing notion of continuous improvement (Kaizen): literature review and field research of Toyota from a perspective of innovation," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 29-59, June.
    20. Takahiro Fujimoto, 2023. "Production economy and industry studies," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:17:p:4891-4911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.